scholarly journals Using counting and participatory approaches in multidimensional poverty assessment: The case of upland farming households in the Philippines

2019 ◽  
Vol 5 (1) ◽  
pp. 1665397
Author(s):  
Calyd T. Cerio ◽  
Filma C. Calalo ◽  
Sherry B. Marasigan ◽  
Josefina T. Dizon
2021 ◽  
Vol ahead-of-print (ahead-of-print) ◽  
Author(s):  
Raheem Olatunji Aminu ◽  
Wei Si ◽  
Shakirat Bolatito Ibrahim ◽  
Aisha Olushola Arowolo ◽  
Adefunke Fadilat O. Ayinde

PurposeThis paper evaluates the impact of socio and demographic factors on the multidimensional poverty of smallholder arable crop farming households in Nigeria.Design/methodology/approachData were drawn from the second wave of the LSMS-Integrated Surveys on Agriculture General Household Survey Panel 2012/2013. The methods adopted in analysing the data were descriptive statistics, Alkire and Foster Method (AFM) and logit regression model.FindingsThe result shows that 84.34% of the households were headed by a male while 80.26% of the respondents were married with a mean household size of seven persons. The multidimensional poverty of arable crop farm households in Nigeria is 0.60, while the adjusted headcount ratio (MPI) is 0.27, with an average intensity of 0.45. We found that deprivation in the dimension of living standard accounted for 45.5% of the overall multidimensional poverty index (MPI). The result of the logistic regression indicates that household location, gender, household size and non-farm income are negatively correlated to poverty. The factors that increase poverty among households are the age of the household head and access to extension services.Originality/valueThe study presents an alternative means of assessing poverty among smallholder arable crop farming households in Nigeria. This study recommends that policymakers should focus more on improving the living standard of arable crop farming households to reduce poverty in rural areas. Similarly, concerted efforts should be made towards providing adequate health care and improved sanitation, supply of electricity and educational training that goes beyond primary education for farming household members.


Author(s):  
Sabina Alkire ◽  
James Foster ◽  
Suman Seth ◽  
Maria Emma Santos ◽  
José Manuel Roche ◽  
...  

2018 ◽  
Vol 17 (3) ◽  
pp. 183-210 ◽  
Author(s):  
Carlos C. Bautista

A multidimensional poverty index is constructed for the Philippines using the Alkire-Foster methodology and data from a 2011 annual poverty indicators survey. This is disaggregated into urban and rural population groups, as well as by dimension and administrative region. At the province level, the study finds a positive relation between poverty incidence and intensity, but the highest intensity levels are experienced in areas where incidence is not that high relative to other areas. Provinces with high incomes generally have low poverty indices and the relationship appears to be nonlinear. An examination of household poverty using mixed logit analysis shows that poverty risk rises with household size. A substantial reduction of the risk is observed for households with heads who were able to matriculate high school. The household head's health status has a negative impact on the household's risk of being poor. These are contrasted with the results using the income poverty definition. Policy implications are drawn from the calculations and the econometric results.


2013 ◽  
Vol 40 (4) ◽  
pp. 331-354 ◽  
Author(s):  
John Ele‐Ojo Ataguba ◽  
Hyacinth Eme Ichoku ◽  
William M. Fonta

Author(s):  
Dang Huu Lieu ◽  
Nguyen Thi Ha Thanh

Vietnamese government is officially applying standards of multidimensional poverty as a basis for poverty assessment in the period 2016-2010, overcoming limitations of income poverty’s assessing methods. However, to the authors’ point of view, its selected indicators have not yet reflected the comprehensive aspects of life, while multidimensional poverty assessment (driven from OPHI) based on sustainable livelihood framework (of DFID) is considered as a better method. This research is conducted in Hang Kia and Pa Co, the mountainous communes of Mai Chau district, Hoa Binh province, by using the later methods. Total 13 indicators under 5 livelihood sources were selected. As the results, the rates of multidimensional poverty in these two communes were shown by the insufficiency in each indicator, by communes and by kinds of poverty households. This result can be used for better decision- making on poverty reduction


2021 ◽  
Vol 94 (1) ◽  
pp. 157-169
Author(s):  
M. A. Bulanova ◽  

Poverty reduction is one of the main objectives of the state policy in the Russian Federation. In the decree of the President of the Russian Federation No. 474 of 21.07.2020 «On the national goals of the Russian Federation for the period up to 2030,» a target is determined - reducing the poverty level by half by 2030. To measure poverty in the Russian Federation until 2021, the absolute concept was used. Within the framework of this concept, it is planned to create a minimum standard on the basis of which the level of poverty was determined. In the Russian Federation, a consumer basket is adopted as a standard, on the basis of which the cost of living is calculated. The cost of living is the threshold for poverty. Since 2021, the methodology for measuring poverty has changed, the calculation is based on the relative concept, the median method is used to measure poverty. A number of countries also use the multidimensional poverty concept with a set of indicators to measure poverty. The article provides a comparative analysis of methodological approaches for poverty assessment. The article proves that the level of poverty depends on the methodological approach underlying its measurement. The author believes that only a multidimensional approach to measuring poverty will contribute to the development of effective public policies to overcome poverty.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document