scholarly journals Cosmological Parameter Determination fromPlanckand Sloan Digital Sky Survey Data in Λ Cold+Hot Dark Matter Cosmologies

2001 ◽  
Vol 558 (1) ◽  
pp. 10-22 ◽  
Author(s):  
L. A. Popa ◽  
C. Burigana ◽  
N. Mandolesi
2012 ◽  
Vol 758 (1) ◽  
pp. L23 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sarah R. Loebman ◽  
Željko Ivezić ◽  
Thomas R. Quinn ◽  
Fabio Governato ◽  
Alyson M. Brooks ◽  
...  

2002 ◽  
Vol 579 (1) ◽  
pp. 48-75 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ryan Scranton ◽  
David Johnston ◽  
Scott Dodelson ◽  
Joshua A. Frieman ◽  
Andy Connolly ◽  
...  

2003 ◽  
Vol 591 (1) ◽  
pp. 1-11 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alexander S. Szalay ◽  
Bhuvnesh Jain ◽  
Takahiko Matsubara ◽  
Ryan Scranton ◽  
Michael S. Vogeley ◽  
...  

2002 ◽  
Vol 571 (1) ◽  
pp. 191-205 ◽  
Author(s):  
Max Tegmark ◽  
Scott Dodelson ◽  
Daniel J. Eisenstein ◽  
Vijay Narayanan ◽  
Roman Scoccimarro ◽  
...  

2002 ◽  
Vol 570 (1) ◽  
pp. 75-85 ◽  
Author(s):  
Istvan Szapudi ◽  
Joshua A. Frieman ◽  
Roman Scoccimarro ◽  
Alexander S. Szalay ◽  
Andrew J. Connolly ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Xin-Fa Deng ◽  
Guisheng Yu ◽  
Peng Jiang

AbstractUsing two volume-limited Main galaxy samples of the Sloan Digital Sky Survey Data Release 7 , we explore influences of galaxy interactions on AGN activity. It is found that in the faint volume-limited sample, paired galaxies have a slightly higher AGN fraction than isolated galaxies, whereas in the luminous volume-limited sample, an opposite trend can be observed. The significance is <1σ. Thus, we do not observe strong evidence that interactions or mergers likely trigger the AGN activity.


2005 ◽  
Vol 621 (2) ◽  
pp. 643-650 ◽  
Author(s):  
David M. Goldberg ◽  
Timothy D. Jones ◽  
Fiona Hoyle ◽  
Randall R. Rojas ◽  
Michael S. Vogeley ◽  
...  

Universe ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 5 (6) ◽  
pp. 145 ◽  
Author(s):  
David Garofalo ◽  
Damian J. Christian ◽  
Andrew M. Jones

By exploring more than sixty thousand quasars from the Sloan Digital Sky Survey Data Release 5, Steinhardt & Elvis discovered a sub-Eddington boundary and a redshift-dependent drop-off at higher black hole mass, possible clues to the growth history of massive black holes. Our contribution to this special issue of Universe amounts to an application of a model for black hole accretion and jet formation to these observations. For illustrative purposes, we include ~100,000 data points from the Sloan Digital Sky Survey Data Release 7 where the sub-Eddington boundary is also visible and propose a theoretical picture that explains these features. By appealing to thin disk theory and both the lower accretion efficiency and the time evolution of jetted quasars compared to non-jetted quasars in our “gap paradigm”, we explain two features of the sub-Eddington boundary. First, we show that a drop-off on the quasar mass-luminosity plane for larger black hole mass occurs at all redshifts. But the fraction of jetted quasars is directly related to the merger function in this paradigm, which means the jetted quasar fraction drops with decrease in redshift, which allows us to explain a second feature of the sub-Eddington boundary, namely a redshift dependence of the slope of the quasar mass–luminosity boundary at high black hole mass stemming from a change in radiative efficiency with time. We are able to reproduce the mass dependence of, as well as the oscillating behavior in, the slope of the sub-Eddington boundary as a function of time. The basic physical idea involves retrograde accretion occurring only for a subset of the more massive black holes, which implies that most spinning black holes in our model are prograde accretors. In short, this paper amounts to a qualitative overview of how a sub-Eddington boundary naturally emerges in the gap paradigm.


2014 ◽  
Vol 11 (S308) ◽  
pp. 530-537
Author(s):  
Nelson D. Padilla ◽  
Dante Paz ◽  
Marcelo Lares ◽  
Laura Ceccarelli ◽  
Diego Garcí a Lambas ◽  
...  

AbstractCosmic voids are becoming key players in testing the physics of our Universe. Here we concentrate on the abundances and the dynamics of voids as these are among the best candidates to provide information on cosmological parameters. Cai, Padilla & Li (2014) use the abundance of voids to tell apart Hu & Sawicki f(R) models from General Relativity. An interesting result is that even though, as expected, voids in the dark matter field are emptier in f(R) gravity due to the fifth force expelling away from the void centres, this result is reversed when haloes are used to find voids. The abundance of voids in this case becomes even lower in f(R) compared to GR for large voids. Still, the differences are significant and this provides a way to tell apart these models. The velocity field differences between f(R) and GR, on the other hand, are the same for halo voids and for dark matter voids. Paz et al. (2013), concentrate on the velocity profiles around voids. First they show the necessity of four parameters to describe the density profiles around voids given two distinct void populations, voids-in-voids and voids-in-clouds. This profile is used to predict peculiar velocities around voids, and the combination of the latter with void density profiles allows the construction of model void-galaxy cross-correlation functions with redshift space distortions. When these models are tuned to fit the measured correlation functions for voids and galaxies in the Sloan Digital Sky Survey, small voids are found to be of the void-in-cloud type, whereas larger ones are consistent with being void-in-void. This is a novel result that is obtained directly from redshift space data around voids. These profiles can be used to remove systematics on void-galaxy Alcock-Pacinsky tests coming from redshift-space distortions.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document