Superinfection with Human Immunodeficiency Virus Type 2 Can Reactivate Virus Production in Baboons but Is Contained by a CD8 T Cell Antiviral Response

1997 ◽  
Vol 176 (4) ◽  
pp. 948-959 ◽  
Author(s):  
Christopher P. Locher ◽  
David J. Blackbourn ◽  
Susan W. Barnett ◽  
Krishna K. Murthy ◽  
Elizabeth K. Cobb ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Human Immunodeficiency Virus ◽  
T Cell ◽  
Human Immunodeficiency Virus Type ◽  
Virus Type ◽  
Virus Production ◽  
Cd8 T Cell ◽  
Antiviral Response ◽  
Immunodeficiency Virus

scholarly journals Entry and Transcription as Key Determinants of Differences in CD4 T-Cell Permissiveness to Human Immunodeficiency Virus Type 1 Infection

2004 ◽  
Vol 78 (19) ◽  
pp. 10747-10754 ◽  
Author(s):  
Angela Ciuffi ◽  
Gabriela Bleiber ◽  
Miguel Muñoz ◽  
Raquel Martinez ◽  
Corinne Loeuillet ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Human Immunodeficiency Virus ◽  
T Cell ◽  
Human Immunodeficiency Virus Type ◽  
Virus Type ◽  
Virus Production ◽  
Cd4 T Cell ◽  
Total Variance ◽  
Immunodeficiency Virus ◽  
Hiv 1

ABSTRACT Isolated primary human cells from different donors vary in their permissiveness—the ability of cells to be infected and sustain the replication of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1). We used replicating HIV-1 and single-cycle lentivirus vectors in a population approach to identify polymorphic steps during viral replication. We found that phytohemagglutinin-stimulated CD4+ CD45RO+ CD57− T cells from healthy blood donors (n = 128) exhibited a 5.2-log-unit range in virus production. For 20 selected donors representing the spectrum of CD4 T-cell permissiveness, we could attribute up to 42% of the total variance in virus production to entry factors and 48% to postentry steps. Efficacy at key intracellular steps of the replicative cycle (reverse transcription, integration, transcription and splicing, translation, and budding and release) varied from 0.71 to 1.45 log units among donors. However, interindividual differences in transcription efficiency alone accounted for 64 to 83% of the total variance in virus production that was attributable to postentry factors. While vesicular stomatitis virus G protein-mediated fusion was more efficacious than CCR5/CD4 entry, the latter resulted in greater transcriptional activity per proviral copy. The phenotype of provirus transcription was stable over time, indicating that it represents a genetic trait.

scholarly journals Resistance against Syncytium-Inducing Human Immunodeficiency Virus Type 1 (HIV-1) in Selected CD4+ T Cells from an HIV-1-Infected Nonprogressor: Evidence of a Novel Pathway of Resistance Mediated by a Soluble Factor(s) That Acts after Virus Entry

1999 ◽  
Vol 73 (9) ◽  
pp. 7891-7898 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kunal Saha ◽  
David J. Volsky ◽  
E. Matczak
Keyword(s):  
Human Immunodeficiency Virus ◽  
T Cells ◽  
T Cell ◽  
Human Immunodeficiency Virus Type ◽  
Virus Type ◽  
Virus Entry ◽  
Virus Production ◽  
Immunodeficiency Virus ◽  
Hiv 1

ABSTRACT A panel of CD4+ T-cell clones were generated from peripheral blood lymphocytes from a patient with a nonprogressing infection of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) by using herpesvirus saimiri as described recently. By and large, all of the clones expressed an activated T-cell phenotype (Th class 1) and grew without any further stimulation in interleukin-2-containing medium. None of these clones produced HIV-1, and all clones were negative for HIV-1 DNA. When these clones were infected with primary and laboratory (IIIB) strains of HIV-1 with syncytium-inducing (SI) phenotypes, dramatic variation of virus production was observed. While two clones were highly susceptible, other clones were relatively or completely resistant to infection with SI viruses. The HIV-resistant clones expressed CXCR4 coreceptors and were able to fuse efficiently with SI virus env-expressing cells, indicating that no block to virus entry was present in the resistant clones. Additionally, HIV-1 DNA was detectable after infection of the resistant clones, further suggesting that HIV resistance occurred in these clones after virus entry and probably after integration. We further demonstrate that the resistant clones secrete a factor(s) that can inhibit SI virus production from other infected cells and from a chronically infected producer cell line. Finally, we show that the resistant clones do not express an increased amount of ligands (stromal-derived factor SDF-1) of CXCR4 or other known HIV-inhibitory cytokines. Until now, the ligands of HIV coreceptors were the only natural substances that had been shown to play antiviral roles of any real significance in vivo. Our data from this study show that differential expression of another anti-HIV factor(s) by selected CD4+ T cells may be responsible for the protection of these cells against SI viruses. Our results also suggest a novel mechanism of inhibition of SI viruses that acts at a stage after virus entry.

scholarly journals Higher Homologous and Lower Cross-Reactive Gag-Specific T-Cell Responses in Human Immunodeficiency Virus Type 2 (HIV-2) Than in HIV-1 Infection

2008 ◽  
Vol 82 (17) ◽  
pp. 8619-8628 ◽  
Author(s):  
Wim Jennes ◽  
Makhtar Camara ◽  
Tandakha Dièye ◽  
Souleymane Mboup ◽  
Luc Kestens
Keyword(s):  
Human Immunodeficiency Virus ◽  
T Cell ◽  
Human Immunodeficiency Virus Type ◽  
Virus Type ◽  
T Cell Responses ◽  
Cell Responses ◽  
Cell Counts ◽  
Immunodeficiency Virus ◽  
Hiv 1

ABSTRACT Human immunodeficiency virus type 2 (HIV-2) infection results in slower CD4+ T-cell decline, lower plasma viral load levels, and hence slower progression of the disease than does HIV-1 infection. Although the reasons for this are not clear, it is possible that HIV-2 replication is more effectively controlled by host responses. We used aligned pools of overlapping HIV-1 and HIV-2 Gag peptides in an enhanced gamma interferon enzyme-linked immunospot assay to compare the levels of homologous and cross-reactive Gag-specific T-cell responses between HIV-1- and HIV-2-infected patients. HIV-2-infected patients showed broader and stronger homologous Gag-specific T-cell responses than HIV-1-infected patients. In contrast, the cross-reactive T-cell responses in HIV-2-infected patients were both narrower and weaker than those in HIV-1-infected patients, in line with overall weaker correlations between homologous and heterologous T-cell responses among HIV-2-infected patients than among HIV-1-infected patients. Cross-reactive responses in HIV-2-infected patients tended to correlate directly with HIV-1/HIV-2 Gag sequence similarities; this was not found in HIV-1-infected patients. The CD4+ T-cell counts of HIV-2-infected patients correlated directly with homologous responses and inversely with cross-reactive responses; this was not found in HIV-1-infected patients. Our data support a model whereby high-level HIV-2-specific T-cell responses control the replication of HIV-2, thus limiting viral diversification and priming of HIV-1 cross-reactive T-cell responses over time. However, we cannot exclude the possibility that HIV-2 replication is controlled by other host factors and that HIV-2-specific T-cell responses are better maintained in the context of slow viral divergence and a less damaged immune system. Understanding the nature of immune control of HIV-2 infection could be crucial for HIV vaccine design.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document