Name Your Friends, but Only Five? The Importance of Censoring in Peer Effects Estimates using Social Network Data

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alan Griffith
2015 ◽  
Vol 21 ◽  
pp. 301
Author(s):  
Armand Krikorian ◽  
Lily Peng ◽  
Zubair Ilyas ◽  
Joumana Chaiban

Methodology ◽  
2006 ◽  
Vol 2 (1) ◽  
pp. 42-47 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bonne J. H. Zijlstra ◽  
Marijtje A. J. van Duijn ◽  
Tom A. B. Snijders

The p 2 model is a random effects model with covariates for the analysis of binary directed social network data coming from a single observation of a social network. Here, a multilevel variant of the p 2 model is proposed for the case of multiple observations of social networks, for example, in a sample of schools. The multilevel p 2 model defines an identical p 2 model for each independent observation of the social network, where parameters are allowed to vary across the multiple networks. The multilevel p 2 model is estimated with a Bayesian Markov Chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) algorithm that was implemented in free software for the statistical analysis of complete social network data, called StOCNET. The new model is illustrated with a study on the received practical support by Dutch high school pupils of different ethnic backgrounds.


Data in Brief ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 35 ◽  
pp. 106898
Author(s):  
Cordelia Sophie Kreft ◽  
Mario Angst ◽  
Robert Huber ◽  
Robert Finger

2021 ◽  
Vol 7 ◽  
pp. 237802312098525
Author(s):  
Balazs Kovacs ◽  
Nicholas Caplan ◽  
Samuel Grob ◽  
Marissa King

We utilize longitudinal social network data collected pre–COVID-19 in June 2019 and compare them with data collected in the midst of COVID in June 2020. We find significant decreases in network density and global network size following a period of profound social isolation. While there is an overall increase in loneliness during this era, certain social network characteristics of individuals are associated with smaller increases in loneliness. Specifically, we find that people with fewer than five “very close” relationships report increases in loneliness. We further find that face-to-face interactions, as well as the duration and frequency of interactions with very close ties, are associated with smaller increases in loneliness during the pandemic. We also report on factors that do not moderate the effect of social isolation on perceived loneliness, such as gender, age, or overall social network size.


1976 ◽  
Vol 35 (3) ◽  
pp. 269-286 ◽  
Author(s):  
Peter Killworth ◽  
H. Bernard

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document