STATE TAX STRUCTURE AND MULTIPLE POLICY OBJECTIVES

1994 ◽  
Vol 47 (4) ◽  
pp. 747-772
Author(s):  
WILLIAM M. GENTRY ◽  
HELEN F. LADD
Public Choice ◽  
1978 ◽  
Vol 33 (4) ◽  
pp. 85-96 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hugh Spall
Keyword(s):  

2007 ◽  
Vol 4 (1) ◽  
pp. 27-34
Author(s):  
Jefferson Mariano

The  present  article  describes  the  evolution  of  the  Brazilian  State tax  structure  as  well as  the  main  pressure  poles  in  terms  of  accomplishing  a  broad  reformation.  It  shows  the  changes  occurred in the institutional order and the unfolded  results  in  the increase  of  the  tax  reformulation  scope of the State, as well as the impacts caused  in the Brazilian community. This study was done  through  the  revision  of  the  national  economic  literature and was based on statistical information  obtained from Instituto Brasileiro de Geografia  e  Estatística  (IBGE)  and from  National  Treasury  Agency of the Brazilian Treasury Ministry.


2010 ◽  
Vol 63 (4, Part 2) ◽  
pp. 995-1021 ◽  
Author(s):  
LeAnn Luna ◽  
Matthew N. Murray

2020 ◽  
Vol 17 (6) ◽  
pp. 62-75
Author(s):  
A. V. Tikhonova

The article is devoted to the development of the concept of the state to manage its tax risks, based on a systematic approach. The author's concept presupposes the presence of the following elements logically arranged according to the principle "from the general to the particular": 1) mechanisms for managing tax risks, 2) disclosing methodological recommendations, 3) specific proposals for changing legislation. To achieve this goal, the author used general scientific methods (deduction and induction, analysis and synthesis, observation, description, generalization) and private scientific methods of cognition (comparison method, graphical and tabular data presentation methods). We have presented a brief overview of the main tax risks of the Russian Federation in the current economic environment, which are classified in four areas: 1) risks in the field of value added taxation; 2) risks in the field of taxation of profits and income; 3) risks, the source of which is Russia's membership in the Eurasian Economic Union; 4) customs risks. The author presents a general scheme of tax risk management by the state, which includes the context, goals and management strategy. The priority mechanisms for managing the tax risks of the state are formulated on the basis of the presented classification of tax risks. These areas include: introduction of an end-to-end product traceability system; substantiation of taxation methods; joint elimination of tax risks (Federal Tax Service, Federal Customs Service, Ministry of Labor, Federal Service for Financial Monitoring); optimization of tax administration costs on the part of both tax authorities and taxpayers; harmonization of indirect taxation, including duty-free trade; harmonization of international tax rules at the international level; selection of the most effective tools for eliminating multiple taxation. A draft "road map" has been developed to improve the management of state tax risks.


2014 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
pp. 23-32
Author(s):  
Philip L. Martin ◽  
Martin Ruhs

The independent Migration Advisory Committee (MAC) was created in 2007 after a decade in which the share of foreign-born workers in the British labour force doubled to 13 per cent. The initial core mandate of the MAC was to provide “independent, evidence-based advice to government on specific skilled occupations in the labour market where shortages exist which can sensibly be filled by migration.” The MAC's answers to these 3-S questions, viz, is the occupation for which employers are requesting foreign workers skilled, are there labour shortages, and is admitting foreign workers a sensible response, have improved the quality of the debate over the “need” for foreign workers in the UK by highlighting some of the important trade-offs inherent in migration policy making. The MAC can clarify migration trade-offs in labour immigration policy, but cannot decide the ultimately political questions about whose interests should be prioritised and how competing policy objectives should be balanced.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document