scholarly journals Summary and recommendations from the workshop ‘Integrating measurements and atmospheric-dispersion modelling to enhance the UK response to radiological atmospheric releases’

2020 ◽  
Vol 40 (3) ◽  
pp. 911-919
Author(s):  
Luke M Western ◽  
Sarah C Millington ◽  
Peter Bedwell ◽  
William Watson
Atmosphere ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 11 (4) ◽  
pp. 352 ◽  
Author(s):  
Frances M. Beckett ◽  
Claire S. Witham ◽  
Susan J. Leadbetter ◽  
Ric Crocker ◽  
Helen N. Webster ◽  
...  

It has been 10 years since the ash cloud from the eruption of Eyjafjallajökull caused unprecedented disruption to air traffic across Europe. During this event, the London Volcanic Ash Advisory Centre (VAAC) provided advice and guidance on the expected location of volcanic ash in the atmosphere using observations and the atmospheric dispersion model NAME (Numerical Atmospheric-Dispersion Modelling Environment). Rapid changes in regulatory response and procedures during the eruption introduced the requirement to also provide forecasts of ash concentrations, representing a step-change in the level of interrogation of the dispersion model output. Although disruptive, the longevity of the event afforded the scientific community the opportunity to observe and extensively study the transport and dispersion of a volcanic ash cloud. We present the development of the NAME atmospheric dispersion model and modifications to its application in the London VAAC forecasting system since 2010, based on the lessons learned. Our ability to represent both the vertical and horizontal transport of ash in the atmosphere and its removal have been improved through the introduction of new schemes to represent the sedimentation and wet deposition of volcanic ash, and updated schemes to represent deep moist atmospheric convection and parametrizations for plume spread due to unresolved mesoscale motions. A good simulation of the transport and dispersion of a volcanic ash cloud requires an accurate representation of the source and we have introduced more sophisticated approaches to representing the eruption source parameters, and their uncertainties, used to initialize NAME. Finally, upper air wind field data used by the dispersion model is now more accurate than it was in 2010. These developments have resulted in a more robust modelling system at the London VAAC, ready to provide forecasts and guidance during the next volcanic ash event.


2020 ◽  
Vol 55 ◽  
pp. S75-S79
Author(s):  
P. Bedwell ◽  
I. Korsakissok ◽  
S. Leadbetter ◽  
R. Périllat ◽  
Cs. Rudas ◽  
...  

Uncertainties were propagated through the chain of atmospheric dispersion and radiological assessment models based on an ensemble approach for a range of scenarios. It was apparent that the time taken to complete model runs, ranging from several hours to a few tens of hours, was not appropriate for an emergency response. Thus, for an operational method, there was a requirement to reduce the number of ensemble members and/or reduce model run time for a single ensemble member, such that a measure of uncertainty may be obtained within the timeframe of one hour, but without significant detriment to the model endpoints derived, the uncertainty estimated and the radiation protection advice inferred. This study proposes recommendations for operationalising an ensemble approach used in the description of uncertainty in atmospheric dispersion modelling and an emergency response.


2018 ◽  
Vol 354 ◽  
pp. 320-343 ◽  
Author(s):  
Grigoris Katsiolides ◽  
Eike H. Müller ◽  
Robert Scheichl ◽  
Tony Shardlow ◽  
Michael B. Giles ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document