Thermally propagated Al contacts on SiGe nanowires characterized by electron beam induced current in a scanning transmission electron microscope

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Aidan Conlan ◽  
Minh Anh Luong ◽  
Pascal Gentile ◽  
Grigore Moldovan ◽  
Martien den Hertog ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Electron Beam ◽  
Electron Microscope ◽  
Transmission Electron Microscope ◽  
Scanning Transmission Electron Microscope ◽  
Induced Current ◽  
Scanning Transmission Electron ◽  
Transmission Electron ◽  
Scanning Transmission ◽  
Electron Beam Induced Current

Nanofabrication of Tungsten Structure by Electron-Beam-Induced Deposition in Scanning Transmission Electron Microscope

2004 ◽  
Vol 10 (S02) ◽  
pp. 566-567
Author(s):  
Z.Q. Liu ◽  
K. Mitsuishi ◽  
K. Furuya
Keyword(s):  
Electron Beam ◽  
Electron Microscope ◽  
Transmission Electron Microscope ◽  
Scanning Transmission Electron Microscope ◽  
Scanning Transmission Electron ◽  
Transmission Electron ◽  
Scanning Transmission ◽  
Electron Beam Induced Deposition

Extended abstract of a paper presented at Microscopy and Microanalysis 2004 in Savannah, Georgia, USA, August 1–5, 2004.

A General Method for Spectrometer Design in the Scoff Approximation

1976 ◽  
Vol 34 ◽  
pp. 538-539
Author(s):  
J. R. Fields
Keyword(s):  
Electron Microscope ◽  
Transmission Electron Microscope ◽  
Energy Analysis ◽  
Incident Beam ◽  
Scanning Transmission Electron Microscope ◽  
Chemical Identification ◽  
Scanning Transmission Electron ◽  
Transmission Electron ◽  
Scanning Transmission ◽  
General Method

The energy analysis of electrons scattered by a specimen in a scanning transmission electron microscope can improve contrast as well as aid in chemical identification. In so far as energy analysis is useful, one would like to be able to design a spectrometer which is tailored to his particular needs. In our own case, we require a spectrometer which will accept a parallel incident beam and which will focus the electrons in both the median and perpendicular planes. In addition, since we intend to follow the spectrometer by a detector array rather than a single energy selecting slit, we need as great a dispersion as possible. Therefore, we would like to follow our spectrometer by a magnifying lens. Consequently, the line along which electrons of varying energy are dispersed must be normal to the direction of the central ray at the spectrometer exit.

Resolution in the Scanning Transmission Electron Microscope

1972 ◽  
Vol 30 ◽  
pp. 454-455
Author(s):  
M. G. R. Thomson
Keyword(s):  
Electron Microscope ◽  
Transmission Electron Microscope ◽  
Spherical Aberration ◽  
Signal To Noise Ratio ◽  
Scanning Transmission Electron Microscope ◽  
Dark Field ◽  
Objective Lens ◽  
Scanning Transmission Electron ◽  
Transmission Electron ◽  
Scanning Transmission

The variation of contrast and signal to noise ratio with change in detector solid angle in the high resolution scanning transmission electron microscope was discussed in an earlier paper. In that paper the conclusions were that the most favourable conditions for the imaging of isolated single heavy atoms were, using the notation in figure 1, either bright field phase contrast with β0⋍0.5 α0, or dark field with an annular detector subtending an angle between ao and effectively π/2.The microscope is represented simply by the model illustrated in figure 1, and the objective lens is characterised by its coefficient of spherical aberration Cs. All the results for the Scanning Transmission Electron Microscope (STEM) may with care be applied to the Conventional Electron Microscope (CEM). The object atom is represented as detailed in reference 2, except that ϕ(θ) is taken to be the constant ϕ(0) to simplify the integration. This is reasonable for θ ≤ 0.1 θ0, where 60 is the screening angle.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document