scholarly journals On the evaporation of solar dark matter: spin-independent effective operators

2016 ◽  
Vol 2016 (09) ◽  
pp. 018-018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Zheng-Liang Liang ◽  
Yue-Liang Wu ◽  
Zi-Qing Yang ◽  
Yu-Feng Zhou
2012 ◽  
Vol 27 (02) ◽  
pp. 1230003 ◽  
Author(s):  
S. CASSEL ◽  
D. M. GHILENCEA

Within a two-loop leading-log approximation, we review the prediction for the lightest Higgs mass (mh) in the framework of constrained MSSM (CMSSM), derived from the naturalness requirement of minimal fine-tuning (Δ) of the electroweak scale, and dark matter consistency. As a result, the Higgs mass is predicted to be just above the LEP2 bound, mh = 115.9±2 GeV , corresponding to a minimal Δ = 17.8, the value obtained from consistency with electroweak and WMAP (3σ) constraints, but without the LEP2 bound. Due to quantum corrections (largely QCD ones for mh above LEP2 bound), Δ grows ≈ exponentially on either side of the above value of mh, which stresses the relevance of this prediction. A value mh>121 (126) GeV cannot be accommodated within the CMSSM unless one accepts a fine-tuning cost worse than Δ>100 (1000), respectively. We review how the above prediction for mh and Δ changes under the addition of new physics beyond the MSSM Higgs sector, parametrized by effective operators of dimensions d = 5 and d = 6. For d = 5 operators, one can obtain values mh as large as 130 GeV with an acceptable Δ<10. The size of the supersymmetric correction that each individual operator of d = 6 brings to the value of mh for points with Δ<100 (<200), is found to be small, of few ≤4 GeV (≤6 GeV) respectively, for M = 8 TeV where M is the scale of new physics. This value decreases (increases) by approximately 1 GeV for a 1 TeV increase (decrease) of the scale M. The relation of these results to the Atlas/CMS supersymmetry exclusion limits is presented together with their impact for the CMSSM regions of lowest fine-tuning.


2013 ◽  
Vol 2013 (11) ◽  
Author(s):  
Emilian Dudas ◽  
Lucien Heurtier ◽  
Yann Mambrini ◽  
Bryan Zaldivar

2014 ◽  
Vol 2014 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Martin B. Krauss ◽  
Stefano Morisi ◽  
Werner Porod ◽  
Walter Winter

2013 ◽  
Vol 2013 (02) ◽  
pp. 039-039 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andrea De Simone ◽  
Alexander Monin ◽  
Andrea Thamm ◽  
Alfredo Urbano

2017 ◽  
Vol 32 (22) ◽  
pp. 1750131
Author(s):  
Karim Ghorbani ◽  
Parsa Hossein Ghorbani

The ATLAS report in August 2016 provided an upper limit for the pp[Formula: see text][Formula: see text][Formula: see text]diboson and [Formula: see text] cross-sections. We consider a pseudoscalar-mediated fermionic dark matter together with gluon and photon effective operators interacting with the pseudoscalar. Choosing the resonance mass being [Formula: see text], 750 GeV and 2 TeV, beside the relic density and the invisible Higgs decay constraints we constrain more the space of parameters with the diboson and [Formula: see text] cross-section upper bounds. We finally provide some benchmarks consistent with all the constraints. Having exploited a pseudoscalar mediator, the DM-nucleon cross-section is velocity suppressed so that the model evades easily the bounds put by the future direct detection experiments such as XENON1T.


2021 ◽  
Vol 81 (3) ◽  
Author(s):  
Chiara Arina ◽  
Andrew Cheek ◽  
Ken Mimasu ◽  
Luca Pagani

AbstractWe consider the treatment of fermionic dark matter interacting with photons via dimension-5 and -6 effective operators, arguing that one should always use hypercharge gauge field form factors, instead of those of the photon. Beyond the simple observation that the electromagnetic form factor description breaks down at the electroweak scale, we show how the additional couplings to the Z boson predicted by the hypercharge form factors modify the relic density calculation and indirect detection limits for dark matter masses of a few tens of GeV and above. Furthermore, constraints from the invisible Z decay width can be competitive for masses below 10 GeV. We review the phenomenology of hypercharge form factors at the LHC as well as for direct and indirect detection experiments. We highlight where the electromagnetic and hypercharge descriptions lead to wildly different conclusions about the viable parameter space and the relative sensitivity of various probes, namely vector boson fusion versus mono-jet constraints from the LHC, and indirect versus direct searches, for larger dark matter masses. We find that the dimension-5 operators are strongly constrained by direct detection bounds, while for dimension-6 operators LHC mono-jet searches are competitive or better than the other probes we consider.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document