scholarly journals Line-of-sight effects in strong gravitational lensing

2021 ◽  
Vol 2021 (08) ◽  
pp. 024
Author(s):  
Pierre Fleury ◽  
Julien Larena ◽  
Jean-Philippe Uzan
2018 ◽  
Vol 614 ◽  
pp. A8 ◽  
Author(s):  
G. Chirivì ◽  
S. H. Suyu ◽  
C. Grillo ◽  
A. Halkola ◽  
I. Balestra ◽  
...  

Exploiting the powerful tool of strong gravitational lensing by galaxy clusters to study the highest-redshift Universe and cluster mass distributions relies on precise lens mass modelling. In this work, we aim to present the first attempt at modelling line-of-sight (LOS) mass distribution in addition to that of the cluster, extending previous modelling techniques that assume mass distributions to be on a single lens plane. We have focussed on the Hubble Frontier Field cluster MACS J0416.1–2403, and our multi-plane model reproduces the observed image positions with a rms offset of ~0.′′53. Starting from this best-fitting model, we simulated a mock cluster that resembles MACS J0416.1–2403 in order to explore the effects of LOS structures on cluster mass modelling. By systematically analysing the mock cluster under different model assumptions, we find that neglecting the lensing environment has a significant impact on the reconstruction of image positions (rms ~0.′′3); accounting for LOS galaxies as if they were at the cluster redshift can partially reduce this offset. Moreover, foreground galaxies are more important to include into the model than the background ones. While the magnification factor of the lensed multiple images are recovered within ~10% for ~95% of them, those ~5% that lie near critical curves can be significantly affected by the exclusion of the lensing environment in the models. In addition, LOS galaxies cannot explain the apparent discrepancy in the properties of massive sub-halos between MACS J0416.1–2403 and N-body simulated clusters. Since our model of MACS J0416.1–2403 with LOS galaxies only reduced modestly the rms offset in the image positions, we conclude that additional complexities would be needed in future models of MACS J0416.1–2403.


2021 ◽  
Vol 103 (10) ◽  
Author(s):  
Tien Hsieh ◽  
Da-Shin Lee ◽  
Chi-Yong Lin

2002 ◽  
Vol 568 (2) ◽  
pp. 488-499 ◽  
Author(s):  
Masamune Oguri ◽  
Atsushi Taruya ◽  
Yasushi Suto ◽  
Edwin L. Turner

2020 ◽  
Vol 496 (3) ◽  
pp. 3973-3990
Author(s):  
Sut-Ieng Tam ◽  
Richard Massey ◽  
Mathilde Jauzac ◽  
Andrew Robertson

ABSTRACT We quantify the performance of mass mapping techniques on mock imaging and gravitational lensing data of galaxy clusters. The optimum method depends upon the scientific goal. We assess measurements of clusters’ radial density profiles, departures from sphericity, and their filamentary attachment to the cosmic web. We find that mass maps produced by direct (KS93) inversion of shear measurements are unbiased, and that their noise can be suppressed via filtering with mrlens. Forward-fitting techniques, such as lenstool, suppress noise further, but at a cost of biased ellipticity in the cluster core and overestimation of mass at large radii. Interestingly, current searches for filaments are noise-limited by the intrinsic shapes of weakly lensed galaxies, rather than by the projection of line-of-sight structures. Therefore, space-based or balloon-based imaging surveys that resolve a high density of lensed galaxies could soon detect one or two filaments around most clusters.


2001 ◽  
Vol 561 (2) ◽  
pp. L147-L151 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nick Sarbu ◽  
David Rusin ◽  
Chung-Pei Ma

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document