scholarly journals Standardization and regulation barriers to innovation faced by architectural and engineering services companies in Brazil

2021 ◽  
Vol 1826 (1) ◽  
pp. 012006
Author(s):  
Manuel Calçada de Sousa ◽  
Maria Fatima Ludovico de Almeida
2015 ◽  
Vol 6 (8) ◽  
pp. 1475-1486
Author(s):  
Gabriela Citlalli López Torres ◽  
Gonzalo Maldonado Guzman ◽  
Sandra Yesenia Pinzón Castro

Author(s):  
O. N. Kolomyts

The article deals with the main barriers to innovation development directly or indirectly affecting the activities of agricultural enterprises. The directions of development of innovations in the enterprises of the agricultural sector are proposed, which will lead to the maximum effect in terms of the multiplier effect on the economy as a whole.


1983 ◽  
Author(s):  
Roger Kozuma ◽  
Emmett Cox ◽  
Herbert Engel ◽  
Walter Greenwood ◽  
Robert Hamann

Author(s):  
Brian J. Broughman ◽  
Brink Lindsey ◽  
Anthony J. Luppino ◽  
Karl S. Okamoto ◽  
Mark C. Suchman ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Zoya N. Mishina

The engineering and technical service of an agricultural enterprise is the core of the production management system. The level of its organization largely determines the effectiveness of equipment and technologies used in production. The strategic goal of agricultural engineering services at all levels is to change radically the system of machine and technological security of agricultural producers. (Research purpose) The research purpose is in determining the economic and social tasks of engineering and technical services in the agro-industrial complex. (Materials and methods) In order to assess the efficiency of engineering departments, it is necessary to analyze the level of use of the company's machine-tractor and automobile fleets. Improving the reliability of the machine and tractor feel now becomes a priority. The majority of experts present this task in the set of measures that practically do not affect the question of perfection of the engineering service. (Results and discussion) The article shows that the development of innovative processes in the field of mechanical engineering contributes to the entry of new equipment and technologies into production and causes the need for farm engineers to study novelties and ways of their effective application. The promising version of the engineering service offers its structure and material support, which will not only provide high production indicators, but also allow specialists to constantly analyze technological processes, search for their reserves using modern information technologies. There is an urgent need to develop models of information support for engineering services, automated workplaces for engineers, the formation of on-farm databases and specialized computer programs to work with it. (Conclusion) The expected efficiency of implementing research results will reduce the cost of maintaining technological machines and equipment.


2009 ◽  
Vol 47 (4) ◽  
pp. 465-488 ◽  
Author(s):  
Antonia Madrid-Guijarro ◽  
Domingo Garcia ◽  
Howard Van Auken

2021 ◽  
Vol 27 (1) ◽  
pp. 5-7
Author(s):  
Calum A. MacRae ◽  
Rahul C. Deo ◽  
Stanley Y. Shaw

2021 ◽  
Vol 10 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Evgeniya Lupova-Henry ◽  
Sam Blili ◽  
Cinzia Dal Zotto

AbstractIn this article, we explore whether organized clusters can act as institutional entrepreneurs to create conditions favorable to innovation in their constituent members. We view self-aware and organized clusters as “context-embedded meta-organizations” which engage in deliberate decision- and strategy-making. As such, clusters are not only shaped by their environments, as “traditional” cluster approaches suggest but can also act upon these. Their ability to act as “change agents” is crucial in countries with high institutional barriers to innovation, such as most transition economies. Focusing on Russia, we conduct two cluster case studies to analyze the strategies these adopt to alter and shape their institutional environments. We find that clusters have a dual role as institutional entrepreneurs. First, these can act collectively to shape their environments due to the power they wield. Second, they can be mechanisms empowering their constituent actors, fostering their reflexivity and creativity, and allowing them to engage in institutional entrepreneurship. Moreover, both collective and individual cluster actors adopt “bricolage” approaches to institutional entrepreneurship to compensate for the lack of resources or institutional frameworks or avoid the pressures of ineffective institutions.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document