scholarly journals Peer review declaration

2021 ◽  
Vol 915 (1) ◽  
pp. 011002
Keyword(s):  
Peer Review ◽  
Environmental Science ◽  
Ministry Of Education ◽  
National Academy Of Sciences ◽  
Scientific Center ◽  
Check System ◽  
Academy Of Sciences ◽  
E Mail ◽  
Scientific Standards ◽  
Single Blind

Abstract All papers published in this volume of IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science have been peer reviewed through processes administered by the Editors. Reviews were conducted by expert referees to the professional and scientific standards expected of a proceedings journal published by IOP Publishing. • Type of peer review: Single-blind • Conference submission management system: papers were submitted by e-mail [email protected] • Number of submissions received: 44 • Number of submissions sent for review: 44 • Number of submissions accepted: 39 • Acceptance Rate (Number of Submissions Accepted/Number of Submissions Received X 100): 88% • Average number of reviews per paper: 1 • Total number of reviewers involved: 22 • Any additional info on review process:(eg Plagiarism check system): AntiPlagiarism.NET • Contact person for queries: Viktor Koval Southern Scientific Center of National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine and Ministry of Education and Science of Ukraine [email protected]

scholarly journals Peer Review Declaration

2021 ◽  
Vol 927 (1) ◽  
pp. 011002
Keyword(s):  
Peer Review ◽  
Environmental Science ◽  
Review Process ◽  
Similarity Score ◽  
Acceptance Rate ◽  
Analysis Techniques ◽  
Email Address ◽  
Check System ◽  
Scientific Standards ◽  
Single Blind

All papers published in this volume of IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science have been peer reviewed through processes administered by the Editors. Reviews were conducted by expert referees to the professional and scientific standards expected of a proceedings journal published by IOP Publishing. • Type of peer review : Single-blind • Describe criteria used by Reviewers when accepting/declining papers. Was there the opportunity to resubmit articles after revisions? ∘ The review was done by considering five (5) aspects : 1) Relevance with topics 2) Novelty and originality 3) Clarity 4) Systematic 5) Analysis techniques and deduction ∘ One reviewer gave points on each aspect between 1-4. Based on total points from those four aspects : 1) Definitely Accept : 16-20 2) Accept : 11-15 3) Possibly Accept : 7-10 4) Rejected : 5-6 ∘ There was an opportunity to resubmit articles after revisions. • Conference submission management system: The paper is uploaded via EDAS (https://edas.info/) • Number of submissions received : 70 papers • Number of submissions sent for review : 60 papers • Number of submissions accepted : 48 papers • Acceptance Rate (Number of Submissions Accepted / Number of Submissions Received X 100) : 68.57 • Average number of reviews per paper : 2 • Total number of reviewers involved : 36 • Any additional info on review process (eg Plagiarism check system) : ∘ The similarity score was checked by the editors to find the plagiarism using https://www.turnitin.com/. ∘ The standard similarity score to be accepted is less than 15%. • Contact person for queries (Full name, affiliation, institutional email address) : Name : Ayodya Pradhipta Tenggara Affiliation : Universitas Gadjah Mada Email address : [email protected]

scholarly journals Peer review declaration

2021 ◽  
Vol 2100 (1) ◽  
pp. 011002
Keyword(s):  
Peer Review ◽  
High Temperatures ◽  
Management System ◽  
Review Process ◽  
Acceptance Rate ◽  
Contact Person ◽  
Academy Of Sciences ◽  
E Mail ◽  
Scientific Standards ◽  
Single Blind

All papers published in this volume of Journal of Physics: Conference Series have been peer reviewed through processes administered by the Editors. Reviews were conducted by expert referees to the professional and scientific standards expected of a proceedings journal published by IOP Publishing. • Type of peer review: Single-blind • Conference submission management system: Authors submitted abstract and papers using the conference website. • Number of submissions received: 57 • Number of submissions sent for review: 33 • Number of submissions accepted: 33 • Acceptance Rate (Number of Submissions Accepted / Number of Submissions Received X 100): 100 • Average number of reviews per paper: 2 • Total number of reviewers involved:38 • Any additional info on review process: Each paper was considered by 2 reviewers at least. Most of the papers had been sent for revision and some of them for revision more than once. • Contact person for queries: Name : Valentin Bityurin, e-mail: Affiliation: Joint Institute for High Temperatures of the Russian Academy of Sciences (JIHT RAS) Email : [email protected]

scholarly journals Peer Review Declaration

2021 ◽  
Vol 908 (1) ◽  
pp. 011002
Keyword(s):  
Peer Review ◽  
Management System ◽  
Environmental Science ◽  
Review Process ◽  
Acceptance Rate ◽  
Contact Person ◽  
Conference Series ◽  
E Mail ◽  
Scientific Standards ◽  
Single Blind

All papers published in this volume of IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science have been peer reviewed through processes administered by the Editors. Reviews were conducted by expert referees to the professional and scientific standards expected of a proceedings journal published by IOP Publishing. • Type of peer review: Single-blind • Conference submission management system: submissions were received and handled via Conference e-mail: [email protected] • Number of submissions received: 65 • Number of submissions sent for review: 63 • Number of submissions accepted: 42 • Acceptance Rate (Number of Submissions Accepted / Number of Submissions Received X 100): 64.6% • Average number of reviews per paper: 2 • Total number of reviewers involved: 19 • Any additional info on review process: Each paper took 2 weeks for revisions after review; 2 rounds of the review process were applied. Contact person for queries: Name : Oleg A. Anenkhonov, Dr. Sci. (Biol.) Affiliation: Institute of General and Experimental Biology SB RAS Email : [email protected]

scholarly journals Peer review declaration

2021 ◽  
Vol 928 (1) ◽  
pp. 011002
Keyword(s):  
Peer Review ◽  
Environmental Science ◽  
Review Process ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
Conference Series ◽  
Research Activities ◽  
Siberian Research Institute ◽  
Academy Of Sciences ◽  
E Mail ◽  
Scientific Standards

All papers published in this volume of IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science has been peer reviewed through processes administered by the Editors. Reviews were conducted by expert referees to the professional and scientific standards expected of a proceedings journal published by IOP Publishing. • Type of peer review: Double-blind • Conference submission management system: https://peatlands2021.ru/ • Number of submissions received: 18 • Number of submissions sent for review: 18 • Number of submissions accepted:15 • Acceptance Rate (Number of Submissions Accepted / Number of Submissions Received X 100): 83% • Average number of reviews per paper: 2 • Total number of reviewers involved:6 • Any additional info on review process: The abstracts were submitted by the online system which is available on the conference page https://peatlands2021.ru/. Uploading of full paper may only be done by participants who attend and present their research activities during the conference. The submitted full papers are then collected by the committee for review regarding the format, language and suitability of the conference scope. The papers were sent to 2 reviewers according to topic of the papers and reviewer’s competency. Reviewer was given around 2 weeks to conduct review of the paper for publication in IOP Conference Series. Authors have 2-3 weeks to resubmit an updated version of their submissions with the necessary changes for further evaluation, which should follow the comments and suggestions from our reviewers. Only those submissions passed the peer review and accepted by the reviewers and editors will be included in the conference proceeding finally. • Contact person for queries: Name: Kharanzhevskaya Yu. A. Affiliation: Siberian Federal Scientific Centre of Agro-BioTechnologies of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Siberian Research Institute of Agriculture and Peat, Tomsk, 3 Gagarin st., 634050, Russian Federation E-mail: [email protected]

scholarly journals Peer review declaration

2021 ◽  
Vol 929 (1) ◽  
pp. 011002
Keyword(s):  
Peer Review ◽  
English Language ◽  
Environmental Science ◽  
Review Process ◽  
Research Station ◽  
Executive Editor ◽  
Conference Series ◽  
Academy Of Sciences ◽  
E Mail ◽  
Scientific Standards

All papers published in this volume of IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science have been peer reviewed through processes administered by the Editors. Reviews were conducted by expert referees to the professional and scientific standards expected of a proceedings journal published by IOP Publishing. • Type of peer review: Single-blind • Conference submission management system: via e-mail [email protected] • Number of submissions received: 39 • Number of submissions sent for review: 39 • Number of submissions accepted: 34 • Acceptance Rate (Number of Submissions Accepted/Number of Submissions Received X 100): 87.2 • Average number of reviews per paper: 2 • Total number of reviewers involved: 37 • Any additional info on review process: The review process was organized by the next way: ➢ All the participants who presented their reports on Symposium sections (virtually, via Zoom) were invited to submit their papers to be published in “IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science”. ➢ Submission of papers was carried out by the Organizing Committee’s e-mail [email protected]. ➢ The secretary of the Organizing Committee made all the materials formal verification and redirected the needed quality submissions to corresponding editors with respect to six thematic sections (one executive editor for each section). ➢ The section executive editor provided at least two reviews for each paper from his section. The reviewers were selected from the list of high quality experts who are world-known specialists in geology, geophysics and geoecology from Russia, Kyrgyzstan, Uzbekistan and Kazakhstan. ➢ With respect to review results all the submissions were divided into three groups: 1) The manuscript is recommended for publication 2) The manuscript is recommended for publication after revision (for these type of submissions the revision process was continued by communication between authors and reviewers via the executive editor in hidden form) 3) The manuscript is not recommended for publication ➢ The final step of papers preparation was related to accepted submissions verification with respect to the IOP:EES format requirements; checking of scientific style and the English language spelling and punctuation correctness. • Contact person for queries: Name: Olga Zabinyakova Affiliation: Research station of Russian Academy of Sciences in Bishkek city, Bishkek, Kyrgyzstan Email: [email protected]

scholarly journals Peer review declaration

2021 ◽  
Vol 845 (1) ◽  
pp. 011002
Keyword(s):  
Peer Review ◽  
Environmental Science ◽  
Review Process ◽  
Scientific Journal ◽  
Acceptance Rate ◽  
Programme Committee ◽  
Volume Editor ◽  
E Mail ◽  
Scientific Standards ◽  
Single Blind

All papers published in this volume of IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science have been peer reviewed through processes administered by the Editors. Reviews were conducted by expert referees to the professional and scientific standards expected of a proceedings journal published by IOP Publishing. • Type of peer review: Single-blind peer review by two committee members • Conference submission management system: Submissions were received and handled via e-mail [email protected]. The initial submission were handled by the secretary of the committee Ivan Krivolapov or his affiliates. Further correspondence with the authors and reviewers was handled via the same email under the supervision of the volume editor Galina Korotkova. • Number of submissions received: 237 • Number of submissions sent for review: 180 • Number of submissions accepted: 161 • Acceptance Rate (Number of Submissions Accepted / Number of Submissions Received X 100): 68% • Average number of reviews per paper: 2,5 • Total number of reviewers involved: 50 • Any additional info on review process: All the submissions were reviewed in two round. • Prior to the conference, preliminary texts (in Russian or in English) and slides (in English) were reviewed by one of programme committee members, who are responsible for this particular session. • After the conference, authors of the reported studies were encouraged to submit full texts in English for publication in this volume. The independent referees (at least one per paper) reviewed all texts. The review process was supervised by the volume editor. The editor communicated to the authors all suggestions and comments from the referees. After the revision, the editor may submit the revised document to the reviewer to get the confirmation of successful revision. • Reviewers of the scientific journal “Vestnik Michurinskogo Gossudarstvennogo Agrarnogo Universiteta” contributed to the process. • Spell and style check was applied for all accepted papers. The specialist from the language and publishing departments of Michurinsk State Agricultural University were involved in this process. • Contact person for queries: Galina Korotkova, Ph.D., Vice-rector for Research and Development of Michurinsk State Agrarian University, co-editor of Vestnik of MGAU (Michurinsk, Russia), [email protected]

scholarly journals Peer Review Declaration Form

2021 ◽  
Vol 2091 (1) ◽  
pp. 011002
Keyword(s):  
Peer Review ◽  
Review Process ◽  
Acceptance Rate ◽  
Email Address ◽  
Trapeznikov Institute ◽  
Check System ◽  
And Mathematics ◽  
Academy Of Sciences ◽  
Scientific Standards ◽  
Single Blind

All papers published in this volume of Journal of Physics: Conference Series have been peer reviewed through processes administered by the Editors. Reviews were conducted by expert referees to the professional and scientific standards expected of a proceedings journal published by IOP Publishing. • Type of peer review: Single-blind • Describe criteria used by Reviewers when accepting/declining papers. Was there the opportunity to resubmit articles after revisions? Reviewers used following criteria when accepting/declining papers: scientific merit (notably scientific rigour, accuracy and correctness); clarity of expression; communication of ideas; readability and discussion of concepts; sufficient discussion of the context of the work, and suitable referencing; originality; motivation; repetition, length of paper; presentation criteria (title, abstract, diagrams, figures, tables and captions, text and mathematics; conclusion) • Conference submission management system: https://uconfy.com/ • Number of submissions received: 146 • Number of submissions sent for review: 146 • Number of submissions accepted: 78 • Acceptance Rate (Number of Submissions Accepted / Number of Submissions Received X 100): 78/146=0.53 • Average number of reviews per paper: 2 • Total number of reviewers involved: 10 • Any additional info on review process: Plagiarism check system was used • Contact person for queries (Full name, affiliation, institutional email address) Vladimir Vishnevsky, V. A. Trapeznikov Institute of Control Sciences of Russian Academy of Sciences, 65 Profsoyuznaya street, Moscow 117997, Russia, [email protected]

scholarly journals Peer Review Declaration

2021 ◽  
Vol 921 (1) ◽  
pp. 011002
Keyword(s):  
Peer Review ◽  
Graduate School ◽  
Environmental Science ◽  
Review Process ◽  
Similarity Index ◽  
Main Campus ◽  
South Sulawesi ◽  
Check System ◽  
Scientific Standards ◽  
Single Blind

All papers published in this volume of IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science have been peer reviewed through processes administered by the Editors. Reviews were conducted by expert referees to the professional and scientific standards expected of a proceedings journal published by IOP Publishing. • Type of peer review: Single-blind • Describe criteria used by Reviewers when accepting/declining papers. a) An articles will be accepted if they meet the following requirements: match the article template, number of pages (max 10 pages), grammar, abstract, pictures and captions, tables and captions, references, article contents (result and discussion), abstracts, methods, and conclusions. b) An articles will be rejected (declined) if they do not meet the following requirements: Doesn’t match the article template, number of pages (max 10 pages), grammar, abstracts, pictures and captions, tables and table captions, bibliography, contents of the paper, abstracts, methods, and conclusions. As an additional, if the similarity index more than 30% checked by turnitin (plagiarism checker) the article will be also rejected. Was there the opportunity to resubmit articles after revisions? Yes, there was opportunity to resubmit an article after revisions. • Conference submission management system: Konfrenzi Automated Conference System. • Number of submissions received: 110 articles • Number of submissions sent for review: 110 articles • Number of submissions accepted: 101 articles • Acceptance Rate (Number of Submissions Accepted/Number of Submissions Received X 100): (101/110) x 100% = 91.8% • Average number of reviews per paper: 2 (twice) • Total number of reviewers involved: 20 people. • Any additional info on review process (ie plagiarism check system): Plagiarism check was conducted by turnitin for all articles. For similarity index more than 30%, the article will be rejected before review. • Contact person for queries: Betrin Natasya: [email protected] Graduate School of Hasanuddin University (Main Campus) JL Perintis Kemerdekaan KM 10. Makassar, South Sulawesi 90245 Sri Widodo: [email protected] Graduate School of Hasanuddin University (Main Campus) JL Perintis Kemerdekaan KM 10. Makassar, South Sulawesi 90245

scholarly journals Peer review declaration

2021 ◽  
Vol 2045 (1) ◽  
pp. 011002
Keyword(s):  
Peer Review ◽  
Review Process ◽  
Acceptance Rate ◽  
Peer Review System ◽  
Review System ◽  
National Academy Of Sciences ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
Check System ◽  
Academy Of Sciences ◽  
Single Blind

Abstract All conference organisers/editors are required to declare details about their peer review. Therefore, please provide the following information: • Type of peer review: Single-blind / Double-blind / Triple-blind / Open / Other Single-blind peer review • Describe criteria used by Reviewers when accepting/declining papers. Was there the opportunity to resubmit articles after revisions? The reviewers provide their constructive & detailed comments and suggestions on the manuscripts via the conference peer review system. The Authors were asked to revise their original manuscripts in alignment with the reviewers’ comments and suggestions for publication. An opportunity will be given to the authors to resubmit their manuscripts after revisions. • Conference submission management system: http://www.academicconf.com/Identity/Account/Login?confName=cmse2021 • Number of submissions received: 185 (include abstracts and full papers) • Number of submissions sent for review: 85 (full papers) • Number of submissions accepted: 34 (full papers) • Acceptance Rate (Number of Submissions Accepted / Number of Submissions Received X 100): 40.0% • Average number of reviews per paper: 2 • Total number of reviewers involved: About 160 • Any additional info on review process (ie plagiarism check system): The conference uses iThenticate to check plagiarism. All papers were checked once submitted and were checked again before they are sent to the Publisher for publication. • Contact person for queries: Guest editor: Dr. Alexander Khotsianovsky [email protected] Managing Editor of Strength of Materials Pisarenko Institute of Problems of Strength of the National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine, Ukraine

scholarly journals Peer review declaration

2021 ◽  
Vol 2090 (1) ◽  
pp. 011002
Keyword(s):  
Peer Review ◽  
Management System ◽  
Review Process ◽  
Associate Professor ◽  
Acceptance Rate ◽  
Contact Person ◽  
Conference Management ◽  
Check System ◽  
Scientific Standards ◽  
Single Blind

All papers published in this volume of Journal of Physics: Conference Series have been peer reviewed through processes administered by the Editors. Reviews were conducted by expert referees to the professional and scientific standards expected of a proceedings journal published by IOP Publishing. • Type of peer review: Single-blind • Describe criteria used by Reviewers when accepting/declining papers. Was there the opportunity to resubmit articles after revisions? • Conference submission management system: IDAS Conference management System • Number of submissions received: 336 • Number of submissions sent for review: 315 • Number of submissions accepted: 189 • Acceptance Rate (Number of Submissions Accepted / Number of Submissions Received X 100): 56.25% • Average number of reviews per paper: 2 • Total number of reviewers involved: more than 600 • Any additional info on review process (ie plagiarism check system): We use Turnitin system for plagiarism checking • Contact person for queries: Dimitrios Vlachos Associate Professor, University of Peloponnese Email: [email protected] Tel: +30 6944 371526

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document