scholarly journals Virtual collaboration strategic planning process using balanced scorecard and critical success factors

2021 ◽  
Vol 1098 (3) ◽  
pp. 032100
Author(s):  
A Wahyudin ◽  
W Widodo ◽  
G T Dwinanda ◽  
R Megasari
2005 ◽  
Vol 30 (1) ◽  
pp. 51-66 ◽  
Author(s):  
I M Pandey

The performance improvement process is a critical component of the strategic planning process. Call it by any name, the process is very vital, and it has always been practised by many companies worldwide for a long time. This process has been recently dubbed as the balanced scorecard. The balanced scorecard is a system of combining financial and non-financial measures of performance in one single scorecard. It includes performance measures for four perspectives: financial, customer, internal business processes, and learning and growth (innovation). It need not be restricted to four perspectives; more may be added. The social responsibility and environmental concerns are two possible candidates. The balanced scorecard focuses on the link between business processes and decisions and results. It is considered as a device to guide strategy formulation, implementation, and communication. It also helps in tracking the performance and providing quick feedback for control and evaluation. A number of companies in the USA and a few companies in India have implemented the balanced scorecard. The success of the balanced scorecard or a similar device will depend on the clear identification of non-financial and financial variables and their accurate and objective measurement and linking the performance to rewards and penalties. The proponents of the balanced scorecard claim that it aligns with strategy leading to better communication and motivation which causes better performance. This assumption could be the single most important reason for the popularity of the balanced scorecard. However, this may or may not be true in practice. This is an empirical question. There is a need to document the experiences of the balanced scorecard companies and establish the cause-effect relationship. There are several reasons for the use of the balanced scorecard by organizations: The balanced scorecard is a comprehensive tool to understand the target customers, their requirements, and the performance gaps. The balanced scorecard provides logic for focusing on creating intangible and intellectual capital which under the traditional financial performance systems was difficult to do. The balanced scorecard is able to articulate the strategy of growth with business excellence which requires greater focus on non-financial initiatives. The balanced scorecard enables employees to understand strategy and link strategic objectives to their day-to-day operations. The balanced scorecard facilitates performance review and feedback on a continuous basis. The balanced scorecard, we strongly believe, will be useful to an organization when it is a part of the strategic planning process. A successful implementation of the balanced scorecard has the following other prerequisites: Top management commitment and support Determining the critical success factors (CSFs) Translating CSFs into measurable objectives (metrics) Linking performance measures to rewards Installing a simple tracking system Creating and linking the balanced scorecards at all levels of the organization Setting up a sound organizational communication system to harness advantages of the balanced scorecard Linking strategic planning, balanced scorecard, and budgeting process for better allocation of resources.


1992 ◽  
Vol 5 (3) ◽  
pp. 31-37 ◽  
Author(s):  
Susan K. MacDonald ◽  
J. Edna Beange ◽  
Peter C. H. Blackford

Strategic planning is becoming to hospitals what business case analysis is to private corporations. In fact, this type of planning is becoming essential for the professional management of Ontario hospitals. The participative strategic planning process at Toronto East General Hospital (TEGH) is an example of how a professionally structured and implemented strategic planning process can be successfully developed and implemented in a community hospital. In this article, the environmental factors driving planning are reviewed and the critical success factors for the development and implementation of a strategic plan are examined in the context of TEGH's experience.


2018 ◽  
Vol 7 (3) ◽  
pp. 146 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mohanad Fayiz Saleem AL-Dweikat ◽  
Mohmoud Ibrahim Nour

The present study aimed to identify the Critical Success Factors of balanced scorecard at Jordanian Commercial Banks, as well as, reveal its effect on Financial Performance The study adapts the quantitative method to achieve their objectives. A randomaly sample of the employees of the higher and middle administrations (managers, deputies, their assistants and sector managers) at Jordanian Commercial Banks selected totaling (120) individuals. Exploratory Factor Analysis, Reliability, Confirmatory Factor Analysis and Structural equation Modelling was performed. The results indicate that the Top Management, Strategic intent, HR aspects and Systems and techniques are Critical Success Factors of balanced scorecard with reliable and valid. Inaddition, the Top Management, Strategic intent, HR aspects and Systems and techniques Success Factors positively effect on financial performance at Jordanian Commercial Banks.


1999 ◽  
Vol 1999 (1) ◽  
pp. 899-901 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gary L. Ott ◽  
David C. Haynes

ABSTRACT Area Contingency Plans (ACPs) are generally evaluated using basic checklists designed to ensure completeness rather than to evaluate content. This approach encourages an increase in plan size, not plan quality, since only a plan that omits something is likely to be rejected (Abordaif, 1997). If an AC? is in the required format and contains masses of miscellaneous information, the prevailing method of assessment deems the plan a success. However, based on a review of a number of ACPs, many plans do not prepare the response community to accomplish tasks that are critical to success during a complex spill. The poster presentation proposes that the planning process should be focused on what we call “Critical Success Factors.” Critical success factors are described as the “things that must be done for the response to be considered a success.”


Author(s):  
Robert McGinty

<p class="MsoBodyText" style="text-align: justify; margin: 0in 0.5in 0pt;"><span style="font-size: 10pt;"><span style="font-family: Times New Roman;">Benchmarking business performance over time is an emerging managerial capability that is used for continuous improvement of existing value adding activities and processes that become leading indicators of strategic success.<span style="mso-spacerun: yes;">&nbsp; </span>To achieve this success, corporations first define success, and then they decide how to get there from where they are presently.<span style="mso-spacerun: yes;">&nbsp; </span>Financial information has long been the language of business with accountants adding up the numbers and defining success in bottom-line figures.<span style="mso-spacerun: yes;">&nbsp; </span>What have been missing are the non-financial elements of business enterprises, elements that can be quantified and linked to the bottom line as predictors of financial success. This paper utilizes Kaplan &amp; Norton&rsquo;s Balanced Scorecard (BSC) and an extensive pilot study of ski resorts to explore an awareness of using non-financial information as a supplement to financial information in explaining overall strategic performance in one segment of the tourism industry. </span></span></p><p class="MsoBodyText" style="text-align: justify; margin: 0in 0.5in 0pt;"><span style="font-size: 10pt;"><span style="font-family: Times New Roman;">&nbsp;</span></span></p><p class="MsoBodyText" style="text-align: justify; margin: 0in 0.5in 0pt;"><span style="font-size: 10pt;"><span style="font-family: Times New Roman;">Leading and lagging indicators of a non-financial nature were used in the study to help focus on the strategic and operational management practices at selected ski resorts in Colorado, Montana, Canada, and the Pacific Northwest.<span style="mso-spacerun: yes;">&nbsp; </span>A list of potential critical success factors and non-critical success factors that help build value and best business practices for ski resort management, were identified through written and oral interview survey techniques following a combination Delphi &amp; Nominal Group Techniques.<span style="mso-spacerun: yes;">&nbsp; </span>Previous work on the balanced scorecard by Kaplan and Norton aided in the identification and description of indicators within each of four balanced perspectives.<span style="mso-spacerun: yes;">&nbsp; </span>Recognition of the intuitive elements of non-financial measures represents a departure from prevalent theory that favors the more traditional financial perspective.</span></span></p>


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document