scholarly journals Peer review declaration

2022 ◽  
Vol 1216 (1) ◽  
pp. 011002
Keyword(s):  
Peer Review ◽  
Review Process ◽  
Materials Science ◽  
Academic Excellence ◽  
Final Decision ◽  
Programme Committee ◽  
Conference Series ◽  
Materials Science And Engineering ◽  
E Mail ◽  
Single Blind

All papers published in this volume of IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering have been peer reviewed through processes administered by the Editors. Reviews were conducted by expert referees to the professional and scientific standards expected of a proceedings journal published by IOP Publishing. • Type of peer review: Single-blind • Conference submission management system: Microsoft CMT - https://cmt3.research.microsoft.com/ • Number of submissions received: 28 • Number of submissions sent for review: 28 • Number of submissions accepted: 17 • Acceptance Rate (Number of Submissions Accepted / Number of Submissions Received X 100): 60.71% • Average number of reviews per paper: 2 • Total number of reviewers involved: 31 • Any additional info on review process: All manuscripts submitted to the CIEES’2021 conference were single-blind peer-reviewed and are carried out to meet the scientific criteria of novelty and academic excellence. The review process was conducted according to the review policy of IOP conference series - each paper was reviewed by at least two reviewers involving both national and international reviewers. During the discussion phase, International Scientific Committee members and the Programme Committee members discussed the reviews in detail. The rebuttals from the authors were also seriously considered. The final decision to accept a paper was entirely based on quality and not its length. • Contact person for queries: Assoc. Prof. Teodor Iliev, PhD, Department of Telecommunications, University of Ruse, Bulgaria, E-mail: [email protected]

scholarly journals Peer review declaration

2021 ◽  
Vol 1204 (1) ◽  
pp. 011002
Keyword(s):  
Peer Review ◽  
Materials Science ◽  
Scientific Evidence ◽  
Similarity Index ◽  
Final Decision ◽  
Scientific Content ◽  
Blind Review ◽  
Materials Science And Engineering ◽  
Scientific Standards ◽  
Single Blind

All papers published in this volume of IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering have been peer reviewed through processes administered by the Editors. Reviews were conducted by expert referees to the professional and scientific standards expected of a proceedings journal published by IOP Publishing. • Type of peer review: Single-blind Peer review conducted was a single-blind review. • Review criteria: • Conference submission management system : Easychair and • Number of submissions received: 37 • Number of submissions sent for review: 37 • Number of submissions accepted : 11 • Acceptance Rate (Number of Submissions Accepted / Number of Submissions Received X 100): 29.72 % • Average number of reviews per paper: 2 • Total number of reviewers involved : 18 • Any additional info on review process: Criteria are based on scientific content, clarity and format. Authors must ensure that the papers submitted use the symposium format. There are three review processes: Initial Review, Peer Review and Acceptance Decision. Initial Review The Editors-in-Chief evaluates each manuscript in the submission theme to determine if its topic and content can be considered for the conference before being reviewed. Manuscripts that do not meet the initial criteria are rejected. Peer Review Papers accepted in the first stage underwent a review and revision process that took an average of two rounds for each paper. The peer review of each paper concentrates on objective and technical concerns to determine whether the research has been sufficiently well conceived, well executed, and well described to justify inclusion in the scientific evidence. After acceptance, articles were reread in English and checked for similarity via Turnitin. Articles with a similarity index greater than 20% were rejected. Acceptance decision Based on the reviewers’ comments, the editor-in-chief makes a final decision on the acceptability of the manuscript and communicates the decision to the authors, along with the reviewers’ reports. Contact person for queries: Dr. IREKTI Amar, [email protected]

scholarly journals Peer review declaration

2021 ◽  
Vol 2064 (1) ◽  
pp. 011003
Keyword(s):  
Peer Review ◽  
Management System ◽  
Review Process ◽  
Acceptance Rate ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
Contact Person ◽  
Conference Series ◽  
E Mail ◽  
Scientific Standards ◽  
Single Blind

All papers published in this volume of Journal of Physics: Conference Series have been peer reviewed through processes administered by the Editors. Reviews were conducted by expert referees to the professional and scientific standards expected of a proceedings journal published by IOP Publishing. • Type of peer review: Single-blind / Double-blind / Triple-blind / Open / Other (please describe) Type of peer review: Single-blind • Conference submission management system: The Conference submission management system assumed interaction through the Conference website (https://gdp2021.uran.ru/) and the Conference e-mail box ([email protected]). • Number of submissions received: 140 • Number of submissions sent for review: 140 • Number of submissions accepted: 132 • Acceptance Rate (Number of Submissions Accepted / Number of Submissions Received X 100): 94 • Average number of reviews per paper: 2 • Total number of reviewers involved: 15 • Any additional info on review process: There is no any additional info on review process. • Contact person for queries: Name : Nikolay Zubarev Affiliation: Institute of Electrophysics, UB RAS, 620016, Ekaterinburg, Russia [email protected]

scholarly journals Peer Review Declaration

2021 ◽  
Vol 908 (1) ◽  
pp. 011002
Keyword(s):  
Peer Review ◽  
Management System ◽  
Environmental Science ◽  
Review Process ◽  
Acceptance Rate ◽  
Contact Person ◽  
Conference Series ◽  
E Mail ◽  
Scientific Standards ◽  
Single Blind

All papers published in this volume of IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science have been peer reviewed through processes administered by the Editors. Reviews were conducted by expert referees to the professional and scientific standards expected of a proceedings journal published by IOP Publishing. • Type of peer review: Single-blind • Conference submission management system: submissions were received and handled via Conference e-mail: [email protected] • Number of submissions received: 65 • Number of submissions sent for review: 63 • Number of submissions accepted: 42 • Acceptance Rate (Number of Submissions Accepted / Number of Submissions Received X 100): 64.6% • Average number of reviews per paper: 2 • Total number of reviewers involved: 19 • Any additional info on review process: Each paper took 2 weeks for revisions after review; 2 rounds of the review process were applied. Contact person for queries: Name : Oleg A. Anenkhonov, Dr. Sci. (Biol.) Affiliation: Institute of General and Experimental Biology SB RAS Email : [email protected]

scholarly journals Peer review declaration

2022 ◽  
Vol 1213 (1) ◽  
pp. 011002
Keyword(s):  
Peer Review ◽  
Review Process ◽  
Materials Science ◽  
Quality Criteria ◽  
Acceptance Rate ◽  
Science And Engineering ◽  
Materials Science And Engineering ◽  
Scientific Standards ◽  
Single Blind

All papers published in this volume of IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering have been peer reviewed through processes administered by the Editors. Reviews were conducted by expert referees to the professional and scientific standards expected of a proceedings journal published by IOP Publishing. • Type of peer review: Single-blind • Conference submission management system: All the manuscripts received form the authors were sent to the reviewers. Each manuscript was reviewed by one reviewer and re-checked by editor. All comments were sent back to the authors to let them make all corrections. The revised versions of manuscripts were checked and approved by editors. • Number of submissions received: 15 • Number of submissions sent for review: 15 • Number of submissions accepted:11 • Acceptance Rate (Number of Submissions Accepted/Number of Submissions Received X 100):73.3 • Average number of reviews per paper: 1 • Total number of reviewers involved:10 • Any additional info on review process: Reviewers considered manuscripts in accordance with: 1) Technical Criteria: scientific rigour, accuracy, correctness of selected methodology. 2) Quality Criteria: originality and novelty, clarity of motivation and results importance. 3) Presentation Criteria: clarity of expression, readability and completeness of presentation, quality of all presented data and figures. • Contact person for queries: Name: Sergey Dubinskiy Email: [email protected]

scholarly journals Peer review declaration

2022 ◽  
Vol 1217 (1) ◽  
pp. 011002
Keyword(s):  
Peer Review ◽  
Review Process ◽  
Materials Science ◽  
Peer Review Process ◽  
Acceptance Rate ◽  
Scientific Committee ◽  
Science And Engineering ◽  
Materials Science And Engineering ◽  
Scientific Standards ◽  
Single Blind

All papers published in this volume of IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering have been peer reviewed through processes administered by the Editors. Reviews were conducted by expert referees to the professional and scientific standards expected of a proceedings journal published by IOP Publishing. • Type of peer review: Single-blind The single-blind peer-review method was used for the peer-review process. • Conference submission management system: The papers are emailed to the Secretariat and managed internally. • Number of submissions received: 21 • Number of submissions sent for review: 21 • Number of submissions accepted: 17 • Acceptance Rate (Number of Submissions Accepted/Number of Submissions Received × 100): 81% • Average number of reviews per paper: 2 • Total number of reviewers involved: 26 • Any additional info on review process: List of Secretariat stage, Scientific Committee stage, Adjudicator are available in this pdf.

scholarly journals Peer review declaration

2021 ◽  
Vol 1195 (1) ◽  
pp. 011002
Keyword(s):  
Peer Review ◽  
Management System ◽  
Review Process ◽  
Materials Science ◽  
Science And Engineering ◽  
Materials Science And Engineering ◽  
Check System ◽  
Scientific Standards ◽  
Single Blind

All papers published in this volume of IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering have been peer reviewed through processes administered by the Editors. Reviews were conducted by expert referees to the professional and scientific standards expected of a proceedings journal published by IOP Publishing. • Type of peer review: Single-blind (authors’ identities are known to the reviewers, reviewers’ identities are hidden from authors) • Describe criteria used by Reviewers when accepting/declining papers. Was there the opportunity to resubmit articles after revisions? Reviewers were requested to review the manuscripts by pointing out the strengths, weaknesses, errors, omissions, and inconsistencies in the papers. Authors were encouraged to revise the papers based on the reviewer’s comments. The review process was then repeated until the reviewers were satisfied with the quality of the submissions. • Conference submission management system: Committee-managed system using Google’s suite of products. Submissions were received through Google forms and managed within Google drive. Correspondence with authors was conducted using Gmail. • Number of submissions received: 118 • Number of submissions sent for review: 118 • Number of submissions accepted: 62 • Acceptance Rate (Number of Submissions Accepted / Number of Submissions Received X 100): 52.5% • Average number of reviews per paper: 2 • Total number of reviewers involved: 106 • Any additional info on review process (ie plagiarism check system): Plagiarism was checked using Turnitin, which is embedded in Canvas - Swinburne Sarawak’s course management system. • Contact person for queries: Jaka Sunarso ([email protected])

scholarly journals Peer review declaration

2021 ◽  
Vol 845 (1) ◽  
pp. 011002
Keyword(s):  
Peer Review ◽  
Environmental Science ◽  
Review Process ◽  
Scientific Journal ◽  
Acceptance Rate ◽  
Programme Committee ◽  
Volume Editor ◽  
E Mail ◽  
Scientific Standards ◽  
Single Blind

All papers published in this volume of IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science have been peer reviewed through processes administered by the Editors. Reviews were conducted by expert referees to the professional and scientific standards expected of a proceedings journal published by IOP Publishing. • Type of peer review: Single-blind peer review by two committee members • Conference submission management system: Submissions were received and handled via e-mail [email protected]. The initial submission were handled by the secretary of the committee Ivan Krivolapov or his affiliates. Further correspondence with the authors and reviewers was handled via the same email under the supervision of the volume editor Galina Korotkova. • Number of submissions received: 237 • Number of submissions sent for review: 180 • Number of submissions accepted: 161 • Acceptance Rate (Number of Submissions Accepted / Number of Submissions Received X 100): 68% • Average number of reviews per paper: 2,5 • Total number of reviewers involved: 50 • Any additional info on review process: All the submissions were reviewed in two round. • Prior to the conference, preliminary texts (in Russian or in English) and slides (in English) were reviewed by one of programme committee members, who are responsible for this particular session. • After the conference, authors of the reported studies were encouraged to submit full texts in English for publication in this volume. The independent referees (at least one per paper) reviewed all texts. The review process was supervised by the volume editor. The editor communicated to the authors all suggestions and comments from the referees. After the revision, the editor may submit the revised document to the reviewer to get the confirmation of successful revision. • Reviewers of the scientific journal “Vestnik Michurinskogo Gossudarstvennogo Agrarnogo Universiteta” contributed to the process. • Spell and style check was applied for all accepted papers. The specialist from the language and publishing departments of Michurinsk State Agricultural University were involved in this process. • Contact person for queries: Galina Korotkova, Ph.D., Vice-rector for Research and Development of Michurinsk State Agrarian University, co-editor of Vestnik of MGAU (Michurinsk, Russia), [email protected]

scholarly journals Peer review declaration

2021 ◽  
Vol 1192 (1) ◽  
pp. 011002
Keyword(s):  
Peer Review ◽  
Review Process ◽  
Materials Science ◽  
Peer Review Process ◽  
Science And Engineering ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
Materials Science And Engineering ◽  
Funding Information ◽  
Scientific Standards ◽  
Single Blind

All papers published in this volume of IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering have been peer reviewed through processes administered by the Editors. Reviews were conducted by expert referees to the professional and scientific standards expected of a proceedings journal published by IOP Publishing. • Type of peer review: Single-blind / Double-blind / Triple-blind / Open / Other Double Blind- Remove the author names and affiliations of the authors anywhere in the manuscript. Remove names and affiliations under the title within the manuscript. Do not include or remove any author names or affiliations in the Acknowledgements section of your manuscript. Author names and Funding information should be removed and can be included later in the peer review process. Do not sign your author response, rebuttals, or appeals with author names. Do not include or remove any names in any file names and ensure document properties are also anonymised. Check that your figures and schemes do not include author details. • Conference submission management system: ∘ https://easychair.org/conferences/submissions?a=26389499 • Number of submissions received: 114 (Abstract) • Number of submissions sent for review: 68 • Number of submissions accepted: 59 • Acceptance Rate (Number of Submissions Accepted / Number of Submissions Received X 100): 55.6% • Average number of reviews per paper: 2 • Total number of reviewers involved: 83 • Any additional info on review process: Turnitin was used to check plagiarism. • Contact person for queries: Assoc. Prof. Ir. Dr. Sarina Sulaiman, Department of Biotechnology Engineering, Kulliyyah of Engineering, International Islamic University Malaysia. Email: [email protected] Assoc. Prof. Dr Noor Noor Illi, Department of Biotechnology Engineering, Kulliyyah of Engineering, International Islamic University Malaysia. Email: [email protected] Dr Mohd Firdaus Abd Wahab, Department of Biotechnology Engineering, Kulliyyah of Engineering, International Islamic University Malaysia. Email: [email protected] Prof. Dr. Zahangir Alam, Department of Biotechnology Engineering, Kulliyyah of Engineering, International Islamic University Malaysia. Email: [email protected]

scholarly journals Peer review declaration

2021 ◽  
Vol 1196 (1) ◽  
pp. 011002
Keyword(s):  
Peer Review ◽  
English Language ◽  
Review Process ◽  
Materials Science ◽  
Materials Science And Engineering ◽  
Future Publication ◽  
Conference Papers ◽  
The Chairs ◽  
Scientific Standards ◽  
Single Blind

Abstract All papers published in this volume of IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering have been peer-reviewed through processes administered by the Editors. Reviews were conducted by expert referees to the professional and scientific standards expected of a proceedings journal published by IOP Publishing. • Type of peer review: Single-blind Single-blind reviewing. 117 submitted full conference papers were reviewed independently by the 30 members of the scientific committee. The six members of the local organising committee also helped with the review process. The acceptance was granted to the papers with the positive reply of two independent reviewers. The reviewers were asked to rate each manuscript with regards to the following criteria: technical, presentation, quality, and English language. The submissions with low ratings were rejected with some comments to improve for their future publication endeavours in other avenues. 10 papers were desk rejected by the conference science committee chair and co-chair due to being out of scope. In 69 instances, the submitted papers were asked to be revised and submitted for another round of reviews. The second round of the review process was conducted by the chairs of various icRS2021 committees to make sure that the comments of the original reviewers were considered by the authors. • Conference submission management system: Aventri • Number of submissions received: 117 • Number of submissions sent for review: 107 • Number of submissions accepted: 73 • Acceptance Rate (Number of Submissions Accepted / Number of Submissions Received X 100): 62% • Average number of reviews per paper: 2 • Total number of reviewers involved: 36 • Any additional info on review process: - • Contact person for queries: • Name : Pezhman Ghadimi Affiliation: University College Dublin Email : [email protected]

scholarly journals Peer review declaration

2021 ◽  
Vol 2117 (1) ◽  
pp. 011002
Keyword(s):  
Peer Review ◽  
Scientific Knowledge ◽  
Review Process ◽  
Combustion Engine ◽  
Acceptance Rate ◽  
Review System ◽  
Conference Series ◽  
E Mail ◽  
Scientific Standards ◽  
Single Blind

All papers published in this volume of IOP Conference Series: Journal of Physics: Conference Series (JPCS) have been peer reviewed through processes administered by the Editors. Reviews are conducted by expert referees to the professional and scientific standards expected of a proceedings journal published by IOP Publishing. • Type of peer review: Single-blind with two level review system i. The conference editor reviewed the submitted papers relevance to the conference topics, checked whether the papers meet the IOP format requirements, and doing similarity check. ii. The independent reviewers evaluated the submitted papers according to the following criteria as the relevance to meet the substance of study, novelty of work, quality and scientific knowledge, and adequate references etc. • Conference submission management system: All the papers were submitted via EasyChair link and conference Email. • Number of submissions received: 67 submissions received • Number of submissions sent for review: 67 submissions were sent for review • Number of submissions accepted: 55 papers accepted • Acceptance Rate (Number of Submissions Accepted / Number of Submissions Received X 100): 82 • Average number of reviews per paper: 2 • Total number of reviewers involved: 26 • Any additional info on review process: -Nil- • Contact person for queries: Dr. Eng Rizal Mahmud, S.Pd., M.T. Head of Internal Combustion Engine Laboratory Phone: +62 823-3113-7305 Institut Teknologi Adhi Tama Surabaya Building A Floor 1, ITATS Jl. Arief Rachman Hakim 100, Klampis Ngasem, Surabaya, Jawa Timur, Indonesia 60117 E-mail: [email protected], [email protected] Website: http://icatech.itats.ac.id

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document