Peer review declaration

All papers published in this volume of IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering have been peer reviewed through processes administered by the Editors. Reviews were conducted by expert referees to the professional and scientific standards expected of a proceedings journal published by IOP Publishing. • Type of peer review: Single-blind Each submitted paper reviewed by two minimum of reviewers after meet the minimum criteria. The review based on the following aspects: 1) Technical Criteria (Scientific merit, Clarity of expression, and Sufficient discussion of the context of the work, and suitable referencing); 2) Quality Criteria (Originality, Motivation, Repetition, Length); and 3) presentation criteria (Title, Abstract, Diagram, figures, tables and captions, Text and mathematics, and Conclusion). We also used iThenticate for plagiarism detection. • Conference submission management system: Easychair • Number of submissions received: 125 • Number of submissions sent for review: 117 • Number of submissions accepted: 90 • Acceptance Rate (Number of Submissions Accepted / Number of Submissions Received X 100): 90/125 = 72% • Average number of reviews per paper: 2 Reviewers • Total number of reviewers involved: 36 • Any additional info on review process: No • Contact person for queries: Name : Dr. Anita Ahmad Kasim Affiliation: Universitas Tadulako, Indonesia Email : [email protected]

Download Full-text

Peer review declaration

IOP Conference Series Materials Science and Engineering ◽

10.1088/1757-899x/1213/1/011002 ◽

2022 ◽

Vol 1213 (1) ◽

pp. 011002

Keyword(s):

Peer Review ◽

Review Process ◽

Materials Science ◽

Quality Criteria ◽

Acceptance Rate ◽

Science And Engineering ◽

Materials Science And Engineering ◽

Scientific Standards ◽

Single Blind

All papers published in this volume of IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering have been peer reviewed through processes administered by the Editors. Reviews were conducted by expert referees to the professional and scientific standards expected of a proceedings journal published by IOP Publishing. • Type of peer review: Single-blind • Conference submission management system: All the manuscripts received form the authors were sent to the reviewers. Each manuscript was reviewed by one reviewer and re-checked by editor. All comments were sent back to the authors to let them make all corrections. The revised versions of manuscripts were checked and approved by editors. • Number of submissions received: 15 • Number of submissions sent for review: 15 • Number of submissions accepted:11 • Acceptance Rate (Number of Submissions Accepted/Number of Submissions Received X 100):73.3 • Average number of reviews per paper: 1 • Total number of reviewers involved:10 • Any additional info on review process: Reviewers considered manuscripts in accordance with: 1) Technical Criteria: scientific rigour, accuracy, correctness of selected methodology. 2) Quality Criteria: originality and novelty, clarity of motivation and results importance. 3) Presentation Criteria: clarity of expression, readability and completeness of presentation, quality of all presented data and figures. • Contact person for queries: Name: Sergey Dubinskiy Email: [email protected]

Download Full-text

Peer review declaration

IOP Conference Series Materials Science and Engineering ◽

10.1088/1757-899x/1210/1/011002 ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 1210 (1) ◽

pp. 011002

Keyword(s):

Peer Review ◽

Materials Science ◽

Preliminary Review ◽

Final Decision ◽

Double Blind ◽

Blind Review ◽

Overall Evaluation ◽

Materials Science And Engineering ◽

Conference Committee ◽

Rational Language

Abstract All papers published in this volume of IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering have been peer reviewed through processes administered by the Editors. Reviews were conducted by expert referees to the professional and scientific standards expected of a proceedings journal published by IOP Publishing. • Type of peer review: Double-blind review First of all, the editor Iris will take a simple check to know whether the paper topics are included in the call-for-paper areas of this conference, if not, the submission will be rejected or seggested to other conferences. The included submissions will then be numbered and sent to the conference committee members(reviewers) for peer-review, the author names, emails and affiliations were removed constantly in this porocess. Each reviewer should fill in the reviewing form and 9 criterias in total are to be scored (5-point scale, with 1=lowest and 5=highest), including “Originality: Is the work relevant and novel”, “Motivation: Does the problem considered have a sound motivation”, “Repetition: Have significant parts of the manuscript already been published”, “Length: Is the content of the work of sufficient scientific interest to justify its length”, “Conclusion: Does the paper contain a carefully conclusion, summarizing what has been learned and why it is useful”, “Reference: Is the reference adequate and necessary”, “Structure: Is the manuscript structure(including the title, abstract and the content) rational”, “Language: Is the language accurate and readable”, “Diagrams, figures, tables and captions: Are they essential and clear”. Then the reviewer will give an overall evaluation or Detailed reviewing result(if any). In the end of the form, the final decision of Accept/Revision/Reject should be selected. No matter which selection the paper was marked, we send the whole reviewing form to the authors. When it is marked by Revision, we will have a double check of the revised papers before acceptation. • Conference submission management system: Yaseen Academy • Number of submissions received: 8 • Number of submissions sent for review: 7 • Number of submissions accepted: 4 • Acceptance Rate (Number of Submissions Accepted / Number of Submissions Received X 100): 50% • Average number of reviews per paper: 3 • Total number of reviewers involved: 12 • Any additional info on review process: A preliminary review was conducted by the main editor and only the approved papers were sent for peer-reviewed. • Contact person for queries: Iris Zhang (Yaseen Academy, Hongshan District, Wuhan, Hubei, China, [email protected])

Download Full-text

Peer review declaration

IOP Conference Series Materials Science and Engineering ◽

10.1088/1757-899x/1217/1/011002 ◽

2022 ◽

Vol 1217 (1) ◽

pp. 011002

Keyword(s):

Peer Review ◽

Review Process ◽

Materials Science ◽

Peer Review Process ◽

Acceptance Rate ◽

Scientific Committee ◽

Science And Engineering ◽

Materials Science And Engineering ◽

Scientific Standards ◽

Single Blind

All papers published in this volume of IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering have been peer reviewed through processes administered by the Editors. Reviews were conducted by expert referees to the professional and scientific standards expected of a proceedings journal published by IOP Publishing. • Type of peer review: Single-blind The single-blind peer-review method was used for the peer-review process. • Conference submission management system: The papers are emailed to the Secretariat and managed internally. • Number of submissions received: 21 • Number of submissions sent for review: 21 • Number of submissions accepted: 17 • Acceptance Rate (Number of Submissions Accepted/Number of Submissions Received × 100): 81% • Average number of reviews per paper: 2 • Total number of reviewers involved: 26 • Any additional info on review process: List of Secretariat stage, Scientific Committee stage, Adjudicator are available in this pdf.

Download Full-text

Peer review declaration

IOP Conference Series Materials Science and Engineering ◽

10.1088/1757-899x/1195/1/011002 ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 1195 (1) ◽

pp. 011002

Keyword(s):

Peer Review ◽

Management System ◽

Review Process ◽

Materials Science ◽

Science And Engineering ◽

Materials Science And Engineering ◽

Check System ◽

Scientific Standards ◽

Single Blind

All papers published in this volume of IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering have been peer reviewed through processes administered by the Editors. Reviews were conducted by expert referees to the professional and scientific standards expected of a proceedings journal published by IOP Publishing. • Type of peer review: Single-blind (authors’ identities are known to the reviewers, reviewers’ identities are hidden from authors) • Describe criteria used by Reviewers when accepting/declining papers. Was there the opportunity to resubmit articles after revisions? Reviewers were requested to review the manuscripts by pointing out the strengths, weaknesses, errors, omissions, and inconsistencies in the papers. Authors were encouraged to revise the papers based on the reviewer’s comments. The review process was then repeated until the reviewers were satisfied with the quality of the submissions. • Conference submission management system: Committee-managed system using Google’s suite of products. Submissions were received through Google forms and managed within Google drive. Correspondence with authors was conducted using Gmail. • Number of submissions received: 118 • Number of submissions sent for review: 118 • Number of submissions accepted: 62 • Acceptance Rate (Number of Submissions Accepted / Number of Submissions Received X 100): 52.5% • Average number of reviews per paper: 2 • Total number of reviewers involved: 106 • Any additional info on review process (ie plagiarism check system): Plagiarism was checked using Turnitin, which is embedded in Canvas - Swinburne Sarawak’s course management system. • Contact person for queries: Jaka Sunarso ([email protected])

Download Full-text

Peer review declaration

IOP Conference Series Earth and Environmental Science ◽

10.1088/1755-1315/917/1/011002 ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 917 (1) ◽

pp. 011002

Keyword(s):

Peer Review ◽

Environmental Science ◽

Similarity Index ◽

Scientific Content ◽

Double Blind ◽

Content Quality ◽

Blind Review ◽

Key Points ◽

Check System ◽

Scientific Standards

All papers published in this volume of IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science have been peer-reviewed through processes administered by the Editors. Reviews were conducted by expert referees to the professional and scientific standards expected of a proceedings journal published by IOP Publishing. • Type of peer review: Single-blind / Double-blind / Triple-blind / Open / Other (in which reviewers do not know the identity of the authors, and authors do not know the identity of the reviewers). The steps for papers selection: a. The author’s name of the submitted abstracts was removed. b. The abstracts were selected by reviewers. c. The authors of the selected abstracts should send full papers according to IOP guidance for Proceeding Conference d. The editors check plagiarism issues, if the paper has a similarity index of 20% and above, then the paper is directly rejected. e. The selected papers were sent to reviewers using a double-blind review system. The papers are reviewed using active track changes. Reviewers should consider the key points related to scientific content, quality, and presentation of the papers. • Conference submission management system: https://inafor.forda-mof.org/, google form, and email: [email protected] • Number of submissions received: 65 abstracts • Number of submissions sent for review: 57 papers out of 65 abstracts • Number of submissions accepted: 44 papers • Acceptance Rate (Number of Submissions Accepted/Number of Submissions Received X 100): 77% of the reviewed papers • Average number of reviews per paper: 3 • Total number of reviewers involved: 9 • Any additional info on review process: plagiarism check system with Turnitin Plagiarism Checker • Contact person for queries: Name: Dr. Niken Sakuntaladewi Affiliation: Center of Standardization of Disaster and Climate Change Instruments, Jl.Gunung Batu No. 5 Bogor, West Java, Indonesia 16118 Email: [email protected]

Download Full-text

Peer review declaration

IOP Conference Series Materials Science and Engineering ◽

10.1088/1757-899x/1216/1/011002 ◽

2022 ◽

Vol 1216 (1) ◽

pp. 011002

Keyword(s):

Peer Review ◽

Review Process ◽

Materials Science ◽

Academic Excellence ◽

Final Decision ◽

Programme Committee ◽

Conference Series ◽

Materials Science And Engineering ◽

E Mail ◽

Single Blind

All papers published in this volume of IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering have been peer reviewed through processes administered by the Editors. Reviews were conducted by expert referees to the professional and scientific standards expected of a proceedings journal published by IOP Publishing. • Type of peer review: Single-blind • Conference submission management system: Microsoft CMT - https://cmt3.research.microsoft.com/ • Number of submissions received: 28 • Number of submissions sent for review: 28 • Number of submissions accepted: 17 • Acceptance Rate (Number of Submissions Accepted / Number of Submissions Received X 100): 60.71% • Average number of reviews per paper: 2 • Total number of reviewers involved: 31 • Any additional info on review process: All manuscripts submitted to the CIEES’2021 conference were single-blind peer-reviewed and are carried out to meet the scientific criteria of novelty and academic excellence. The review process was conducted according to the review policy of IOP conference series - each paper was reviewed by at least two reviewers involving both national and international reviewers. During the discussion phase, International Scientific Committee members and the Programme Committee members discussed the reviews in detail. The rebuttals from the authors were also seriously considered. The final decision to accept a paper was entirely based on quality and not its length. • Contact person for queries: Assoc. Prof. Teodor Iliev, PhD, Department of Telecommunications, University of Ruse, Bulgaria, E-mail: [email protected]

Download Full-text

Peer review declaration

IOP Conference Series Materials Science and Engineering ◽

10.1088/1757-899x/1192/1/011002 ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 1192 (1) ◽

pp. 011002

Keyword(s):

Peer Review ◽

Review Process ◽

Materials Science ◽

Peer Review Process ◽

Science And Engineering ◽

Double Blind ◽

Materials Science And Engineering ◽

Funding Information ◽

Scientific Standards ◽

Single Blind

All papers published in this volume of IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering have been peer reviewed through processes administered by the Editors. Reviews were conducted by expert referees to the professional and scientific standards expected of a proceedings journal published by IOP Publishing. • Type of peer review: Single-blind / Double-blind / Triple-blind / Open / Other Double Blind- Remove the author names and affiliations of the authors anywhere in the manuscript. Remove names and affiliations under the title within the manuscript. Do not include or remove any author names or affiliations in the Acknowledgements section of your manuscript. Author names and Funding information should be removed and can be included later in the peer review process. Do not sign your author response, rebuttals, or appeals with author names. Do not include or remove any names in any file names and ensure document properties are also anonymised. Check that your figures and schemes do not include author details. • Conference submission management system: ∘ https://easychair.org/conferences/submissions?a=26389499 • Number of submissions received: 114 (Abstract) • Number of submissions sent for review: 68 • Number of submissions accepted: 59 • Acceptance Rate (Number of Submissions Accepted / Number of Submissions Received X 100): 55.6% • Average number of reviews per paper: 2 • Total number of reviewers involved: 83 • Any additional info on review process: Turnitin was used to check plagiarism. • Contact person for queries: Assoc. Prof. Ir. Dr. Sarina Sulaiman, Department of Biotechnology Engineering, Kulliyyah of Engineering, International Islamic University Malaysia. Email: [email protected] Assoc. Prof. Dr Noor Noor Illi, Department of Biotechnology Engineering, Kulliyyah of Engineering, International Islamic University Malaysia. Email: [email protected] Dr Mohd Firdaus Abd Wahab, Department of Biotechnology Engineering, Kulliyyah of Engineering, International Islamic University Malaysia. Email: [email protected] Prof. Dr. Zahangir Alam, Department of Biotechnology Engineering, Kulliyyah of Engineering, International Islamic University Malaysia. Email: [email protected]

Download Full-text

Peer review declaration

IOP Conference Series Materials Science and Engineering ◽

10.1088/1757-899x/1200/1/011002 ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 1200 (1) ◽

pp. 011002

Keyword(s):

Peer Review ◽

Materials Science ◽

Similarity Index ◽

Preliminary Review ◽

Scientific Content ◽

Double Blind ◽

Content Quality ◽

Key Points ◽

Materials Science And Engineering ◽

Paper Format

All papers published in this volume of IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering have been peer reviewed through processes administered by the Editors. Reviews were conducted by expert referees to the professional and scientific standards expected of a proceedings journal published by IOP Publishing. • Type of peer review: Double-blind • Conference submission management system: http://confbay.com/ • Number of submissions received: 38 • Number of submissions sent for review: 37 • Number of submissions accepted: 36 • Acceptance Rate (Number of Submissions Accepted / Number of Submissions Received X 100): 94.74% • Average number of reviews per paper: 3 • Total number of reviewers involved: 59 • Any additional info on review process: 1. A preliminary review was conducted by the main editor and only approved papers were sent for peer-review. 2. Manuscripts are selected based on the reviewer’s comments on the criteria given to them, as below: • Accept (publishable as it is) • Return to author for VERY MINOR revisions • Return to author for MINOR revisions • Return to author for Major revisions • Reject 3. Reviewers were asked to rate/provide feedbacks to the following key points related to scientific content, quality and presentation: • Abstract manifest the whole paper. • The theoretical/conceptual framework. • Methodology (sampling, design, instrumentation, statistical analysis, etc.). • Presentation of the paper in terms of writing style. • Presentation of the paper in terms of clarity/readability. • Things to be improved (Grammar, Paper format, Writing structure). • Comment to Author which includes technical, quality and presentation criteria of the manuscript. 4. We also run plagiarism checking using Turnitin software and remind the authors to ensure the similarity index should not be more than 25%. • Contact person for queries: Nor Haslinda Abas ([email protected])

Download Full-text

Peer review declaration

IOP Conference Series Materials Science and Engineering ◽

10.1088/1757-899x/1196/1/011002 ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 1196 (1) ◽

pp. 011002

Keyword(s):

Peer Review ◽

English Language ◽

Review Process ◽

Materials Science ◽

Materials Science And Engineering ◽

Future Publication ◽

Conference Papers ◽

The Chairs ◽

Scientific Standards ◽

Single Blind

Abstract All papers published in this volume of IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering have been peer-reviewed through processes administered by the Editors. Reviews were conducted by expert referees to the professional and scientific standards expected of a proceedings journal published by IOP Publishing. • Type of peer review: Single-blind Single-blind reviewing. 117 submitted full conference papers were reviewed independently by the 30 members of the scientific committee. The six members of the local organising committee also helped with the review process. The acceptance was granted to the papers with the positive reply of two independent reviewers. The reviewers were asked to rate each manuscript with regards to the following criteria: technical, presentation, quality, and English language. The submissions with low ratings were rejected with some comments to improve for their future publication endeavours in other avenues. 10 papers were desk rejected by the conference science committee chair and co-chair due to being out of scope. In 69 instances, the submitted papers were asked to be revised and submitted for another round of reviews. The second round of the review process was conducted by the chairs of various icRS2021 committees to make sure that the comments of the original reviewers were considered by the authors. • Conference submission management system: Aventri • Number of submissions received: 117 • Number of submissions sent for review: 107 • Number of submissions accepted: 73 • Acceptance Rate (Number of Submissions Accepted / Number of Submissions Received X 100): 62% • Average number of reviews per paper: 2 • Total number of reviewers involved: 36 • Any additional info on review process: - • Contact person for queries: • Name : Pezhman Ghadimi Affiliation: University College Dublin Email : [email protected]

Download Full-text