scholarly journals 3D chest tomosynthesis using a stationary flat panel source array and a stationary detector: A Monte Carlo proof of concept.

Author(s):  
Thomas George Primidis ◽  
Stephen G Wells ◽  
Vadim Y Soloviev ◽  
Carsten P Welsch

Abstract 3D imaging modalities such as computed tomography and digital tomosynthesis typically scan the patient from different angles with a lengthy mechanical movement of a single X-ray tube. Therefore, millions of 3D scans per year require expensive mechanisms to support a heavy X-ray source and have to compensate for machine vibrations and patient movements. However, recent developments in cold-cathode field emission technology allow the creation of compact, stationary arrays of emitters. Adaptix Ltd. has developed a novel, low-cost, square array of such emitters and demonstrated 3D digital tomosynthesis of human extremities and small animals. The use of cold-cathode field emitters also makes the system compact and lightweight. This paper presents Monte Carlo simulations of a concept upgrade of the Adaptix system from the current 60 kVp to 90 kVp and 120 kVp which are better suited for chest imaging. Between 90 kVp and 120 kVp, 3D image quality appears insensitive to voltage and at 90 kVp the photon yield is reduced by 40-50% while effective dose declines by 14%. A square array of emitters can adequately illuminate a subject for tomosynthesis from a shorter source-to-image distance, thereby reducing the required input power, and offsetting the 28-50% more input power that is required for operation at 90 kVp. This modelling suggests that lightweight, stationary cold-cathode X-ray source arrays could be used for chest tomosynthesis at a lower voltage, with less dose and without sacrificing image quality. This will reduce weight, size and cost, enabling 3D imaging to be brought to the bedside.

2006 ◽  
Vol 33 (6Part2) ◽  
pp. 1990-1990
Author(s):  
I Sechopoulos ◽  
S Suryanarayanan ◽  
S Vedantham ◽  
A Karellas

Author(s):  
Roger H. Johnson ◽  
Robert M. Fisher ◽  
Alan C. Nelson

X-ray microscopy provides the ability to obtain transmission, micron-order spatial resolution images of thick, wet objects at atmospheric pressure, e.g. to image some living specimens under dynamic conditions. Past excitement in the field was dulled by difficulties in extracting desirable information from the vast amount of data which gets superimposed on an integrating planar detector such as film. Tomographic techniques such as backprojection reconstruction and laminography can solve the detail superimposition problem. Recent advances in solid state detectors facilitate the timely acquisition of multiple images required for tomographic imaging. We report here on our x-ray source and detector characteristics as well as initial planar microscopy and 3D imaging results from our ongoing development of a low-cost x-ray microtomograph.


2009 ◽  
Vol 36 (11) ◽  
pp. 5149-5161 ◽  
Author(s):  
P. Oliva ◽  
B. Golosio ◽  
S. Stumbo ◽  
A. Bravin ◽  
P. Tomassini

Author(s):  
Nicole Hättenschwiler ◽  
Marcia Mendes ◽  
Adrian Schwaninger

Objective: This study compared the visual inspection performance of airport security officers (screeners) when screening hold baggage with state-of-the-art 3D versus older 2D imaging. Background: 3D imaging based on computer tomography features better automated detection of explosives and higher baggage throughput than older 2D X-ray imaging technology. Nonetheless, some countries and airports hesitate to implement 3D systems due to their lower image quality and the concern that screeners will need extensive and specific training before they can be allowed to work with 3D imaging. Method: Screeners working with 2D imaging (2D screeners) and screeners working with 3D imaging (3D screeners) conducted a simulated hold baggage screening task with both types of imaging. Differences in image quality of the imaging systems were assessed with the standard procedure for 2D imaging. Results: Despite lower image quality, screeners’ detection performance with 3D imaging was similar to that with 2D imaging. 3D screeners revealed higher detection performance with both types of imaging than 2D screeners. Conclusion: Features of 3D imaging systems (3D image rotation and slicing) seem to compensate for lower image quality. Visual inspection competency acquired with one type of imaging seems to transfer to visual inspection with the other type of imaging. Application: Replacing older 2D with newer 3D imaging systems can be recommended. 2D screeners do not need extensive and specific training to achieve comparable detection performance with 3D imaging. Current image quality standards for 2D imaging need revision before they can be applied to 3D imaging.


Radiography ◽  
2012 ◽  
Vol 18 (4) ◽  
pp. 275-278 ◽  
Author(s):  
W.E. Muhogora ◽  
A. Trianni ◽  
F. Toso ◽  
A. Devetti ◽  
R. Padovani ◽  
...  

2007 ◽  
Vol 555 ◽  
pp. 137-140
Author(s):  
Srboljub J. Stanković ◽  
R.D. Ilić ◽  
O. Ciraj-Bjelac ◽  
M. Kovačević ◽  
David Davidović

The adequate choice of different target materials for X-ray generators is a very important subject of engineers’ practice and research. In the present work we analyze theoretically the transport of electrons through the anode material and the production of the corresponding bremsstrahlung radiation. In our analysis we simulate the particle transport with the help of the FOTELP code, which is based on the Monte Carlo simulation. Our main aim is to develop an efficient and handy method, which could be helpful in improving the design of the X-ray tube components and in reducing of the patient dose, while keeping the image quality. The obtained results are encouraging.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document