When You Don't Need a Form 3674; FDA Is Asked for Guidance on Design of Pneumonia Trials; IRB Blocked from Granting Expedited Approvals; PhRMA Objects to Characterization of All Industry-Sponsored Clinical Trials as Biased; Protections for Subjects in Overseas Trials; Questionable Cell Therapy Trial Under Investigation in Austria; FDA to Increase Control of Clinical Trials; FDA, EMEA to Accept Biomarker Data on Renal Damage

2008 ◽  
Vol 27 (4) ◽  
pp. 320-322
2011 ◽  
Vol 17 (2) ◽  
pp. 192-196 ◽  
Author(s):  
Edwin M. Horwitz ◽  
Mary M. Horowitz ◽  
Nancy L. DiFronzo ◽  
Donald B. Kohn ◽  
Helen E. Heslop

Neurosurgery ◽  
2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ben Jiahe Gu ◽  
David K Kung ◽  
Han-Chiao Isaac Chen

Abstract Cell therapy has been widely recognized as a promising strategy to enhance recovery in stroke survivors. However, despite an abundance of encouraging preclinical data, successful clinical translation remains elusive. As the field continues to advance, it is important to reexamine prior clinical trials in the context of their intended mechanisms, as this can inform future preclinical and translational efforts. In the present work, we review the major clinical trials of cell therapy for stroke and highlight a mechanistic shift between the earliest studies, which aimed to replace dead and damaged neurons, and later ones that focused on exploiting the various neuromodulatory effects afforded by stem cells. We discuss why both mechanisms are worth pursuing and emphasize the means through which cell replacement can still be achieved.


Author(s):  
Minas Nalbandian ◽  
Mingming Zhao ◽  
Mitsuru Sasaki-Honda ◽  
Tatsuya Jonouchi ◽  
Antonio Lucena-Cacace ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 141 (5) ◽  
pp. S115
Author(s):  
L.A. Garza ◽  
S. Lee ◽  
E. Sweren ◽  
A. Li ◽  
D. Kim ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  

2021 ◽  
Vol 10 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Komal Adeel ◽  
Nathan J. Fergusson ◽  
Risa Shorr ◽  
Harold Atkins ◽  
Kevin A. Hay

Abstract Background Chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cell therapy has had great success in treating patients with relapsed or refractory B cell malignancies, with CD19-targeting therapies now approved in many countries. However, a subset of patients fails to respond or relapse after CD19 CAR T cell therapy, in part due to antigen loss, which has prompted the search for alternative antigen targets. CD22 is another antigen found on the surface of B cells. CARs targeting CD22 alone or in combination with other antigens have been investigated in several pre-clinical and clinical trials. Given the heterogeneity and small size of CAR T cell therapy clinical trials, systematic reviews are needed to evaluate their efficacy and safety. Here, we propose a systematic review of CAR T cell therapies targeting CD22, alone or in combination with other antigen targets, in B cell malignancies. Methods We will perform a systematic search of EMBASE, MEDLINE, Web of Science, Cochrane Register of Controlled Trials, clinicaltrials.gov, and the International Clinical Trials Registry Platform. Ongoing and completed clinical trials will be identified and cataloged. Interventional studies investigating CD22 CAR T cells, including various multi-antigen targeting approaches, in patients with relapsed or refractory B cell malignancies will be eligible for inclusion. Only full-text articles, conference abstracts, letters, and case reports will be considered. Our primary outcome will be a complete response, defined as absence of detectable cancer. Secondary outcomes will include adverse events, overall response, minimal residual disease, and relapse, among others. Quality assessment will be performed using a modified Institute of Health Economics tool designed for interventional single-arm studies. We will report a narrative synthesis of clinical studies, presented in tabular format. If appropriate, a meta-analysis will be performed using a random effects model to synthesize results. Discussion The results of the proposed review will help inform clinicians, patients, and other stakeholders of the risks and benefits of CD22 CAR T cell therapies. It will identify gaps or inconsistencies in outcome reporting and help to guide future clinical trials investigating CAR T cells. Systematic review registration PROSPERO registration number: CRD42020193027


2014 ◽  
Vol 90 (1) ◽  
pp. S581-S582 ◽  
Author(s):  
N. Cihoric ◽  
A. Tsikkinis ◽  
D.M. Aebersold ◽  
K. Lössl ◽  
K. Zaugg

2015 ◽  
Vol 26 (7) ◽  
pp. 1280-1291 ◽  
Author(s):  
V. Bossuyt ◽  
E. Provenzano ◽  
W.F. Symmans ◽  
J.C. Boughey ◽  
C. Coles ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document