Association of microRNA-93, 190, 200b and Receptor Status in Core Biopsies from Stage III Breast Cancer Patients

Abstract Background To characterize the clinico-pathological features including estrogen receptor (ER), progesterone receptor (PR) and Her-2/neu (HER2) expression in breast cancers in Botswana, and to compare them by HIV status. Methods This was a retrospective study using data from the National Health Laboratory and Diagnofirm Medical Laboratory in Gaborone from January 1, 2011 to December 31, 2015. Clinico-pathological details of patients were abstracted from electronic medical records. Results A total of 384 unique breast cancer reports met our inclusion criteria. Of the patients with known HIV status, 42.7% (50/117) were HIV-infected. Median age at the time of breast cancer diagnosis was 54 years (IQR 44–66 years). HIV-infected individuals were more likely to be diagnosed before age 50 years compared to HIV-uninfected individuals (68.2% vs 23.8%, p < 0.001). The majority of patients (68.6%, 35/51) presented with stage III at diagnosis. Stage IV disease was not presented because of the lack of data in pathology records surveyed, and additionally these patients may not present to clinic if the disease is advanced. Overall, 68.9% (151/219) of tumors were ER+ or PR+ and 16.0% (35/219) were HER2+. ER+ or PR+ or both, and HER2- was the most prevalent profile (62.6%, 132/211), followed by triple negative (ER−/PR−/HER2-, 21.3%, 45/211), ER+ or PR+ or both, and HER2+, (9.0%, 19/211) and ER−/PR−/HER2+ (7.1%, 15/211). There was no significant difference in receptor status noted between HIV-infected and HIV-uninfected individuals. Conclusions Majority of breast cancer patients in Botswana present with advanced disease (stage III) at diagnosis and hormone receptor positive disease. HIV-infected breast cancer patients tended to present at a younger age compared to HIV-uninfected patients. HIV status does not appear to be associated with the distribution of receptor status in breast cancers in Botswana.

Download Full-text

Breast-conserving surgery after neoadjuvant chemotherapy for stage III breast cancer patients.

Journal of Clinical Oncology ◽

10.1200/jco.2012.30.15_suppl.e11532 ◽

2012 ◽

Vol 30 (15_suppl) ◽

pp. e11532-e11532

Author(s):

Hee-Chul Shin ◽

Wonshik Han ◽

Hyeong-Gon Moon ◽

Woo Kyung Moon ◽

Seock-Ah Im ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Breast Cancer ◽

Cancer Patients ◽

Clinical Stage ◽

Survival Rates ◽

Disease Free Survival ◽

Stage Iii ◽

Breast Cancer Patients ◽

Free Survival ◽

Stage Iii Breast Cancer

e11532 Background: Neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NCT) is a reasonable option for operable breast cancer in terms of downsizing large tumor and increasing the rate of breast-conserving surgery (BCS). However, BCS in patients with large breast tumors down-staged by NCT remains still controversial because of the possibility of residual tumor and resistance to NCT. Aims of this study were to evaluate the long-term survival results of patients who received NCT and BCS compared to patients who received BCS first and to compare recurrence and survival rates between patients who received preplanned BCS and those who received down-staged BCS among patients who underwent NCT. Methods: Between 2000 and 2007, 70 patients with clinical stage III breast cancer who received BCS after NCT (NCT group) and 72 patients with clinical stage III breast cancer who underwent BCS first (Surgery group) were retrospectively reviewed. Among 70 patients received NCT, 45 patients (64.3%) received preplanned BCS (preplanned BCS group) and 25 patients (35.7%) received down-staged BCS (down-staged BCS group). The long-term results including ipsilateral breast tumor recurrence (IBTR), locoregional recurrence (LRR), disease recurrence and survival rates were compared with groups. Results: There was no significant difference in IBTR-free survival, LRR-free survival rates, disease-free survival and overall survival rates between the NCT and the Surgery group (p=0.971, p=0.294, p=0.863 and p=0.933, respectively). Among patients who received NCT, IBTR-free survival, LRR-free survival, disease-free survival and overall survival rates was not also different between the preplanned BCS group and the down-staged BCS group (p=0.278, p=0.501, p=0.776 and p=0.412, respectively). Conclusions: Our study demonstrated that patients who received BCS after NCT showed similar long-term resutls compared to patients who received BCS first in clinical stage III breast cancer patients. Also, down-staged BCS shows is oncologically as safe as preplanned BCS in clinical stage III breast cancer patients in terms of recurrence and survival.

Download Full-text

Prognostic significance of bcl-2 expression in stage III breast cancer patients who received doxorubicin and cyclophosphamide followed by paclitaxel as adjuvant chemotherapy

Journal of Clinical Oncology ◽

10.1200/jco.2006.24.18_suppl.670 ◽

2006 ◽

Vol 24 (18_suppl) ◽

pp. 670-670 ◽

Cited By ~ 1

Author(s):

K. Lee ◽

B. Kim ◽

S. Lee ◽

W. Han ◽

D. Kim ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Breast Cancer ◽

Adjuvant Chemotherapy ◽

Prognostic Factor ◽

Cancer Patients ◽

Prognostic Significance ◽

Stage Iii ◽

Breast Cancer Patients ◽

Stage Iii Breast Cancer ◽

Erbb2 Overexpression ◽

Er Expression

670 Background: Bcl-2 is an anti-apoptotic marker and regulated by hormonal receptor pathways in breast cancer. We performed this study to assess the prognostic significance of ER, PR, p53, c-erbB2, bcl-2, Ki-67, and EGFR as a marker for relapse in breast cancer patients who received same adjuvant therapy in a single institution. Methods: A cohort of 154 curatively resected breast cancer patients who had 4 lymph nodes or more and received doxorubicin and cyclophosphamide followed by paclitaxel (AC/T) as adjuvant chemotherapy was analyzed for clinicopathologic characteristics including disease-free survival (DFS). Patients with ER and/or PR expression received 5 years of tamoxifen following AC/T. The markers were analyzed by immunohistochemistry. Results: Median f/u duration was 25 months and 32 patients (20.8%) had recurrences. Stage (IIIa vs. IIIc) affected recurrences significantly, however, types of surgery, histology, histologic grade, presence of endolymphatic emboli, or close resection margin did not. Among the immunohistochemical markers, bcl-2 expression was the only one to be associated significantly with prolonged DFS (median 54 mo in bcl-2 (−) vs. not reached in bcl-2 (+); p=0.016). Furthermore, bcl-2 was an independent prognostic factor for DFS in multivariate analysis. Bcl-2 expression was significantly correlated with ER expression (p<0.001), and inversely correlated with c-erbB2 overexpression (p=0.027). Patients with both ER and bcl-2 expression had a longer DFS compared to the other patients (not reached vs. 54 mo, p=0.019). Patients with bcl-2 expression had a significantly longer DFS even in ER (+) subgroups (not reached vs 54 mo; p=0.011). Patients with c-erbB2 overexpression, ER (−) and bcl-2 (−) had a shorter DFS than the others (38 mo vs. not reached; p=0.029). Conclusions: In our homogenous patient cohort, bcl-2 expression was correlated with ER expression, and inversely correlated with c-erbB2 overexpression. Bcl-2 was an independent prognostic factor for DFS in curatively resected stage III breast cancer patients. No significant financial relationships to disclose.

Download Full-text