Oral Anti-Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor Drugs and Ocular Adverse Events

2018 ◽  
Vol 34 (6) ◽  
pp. 432-435 ◽  
Author(s):  
Frederick T. Fraunfelder ◽  
Frederick W. Fraunfelder
Author(s):  
Nadège Ngo Ntjam ◽  
Marie Thulliez ◽  
Gilles Paintaud ◽  
Francesco Salvo ◽  
Denis Angoulvant ◽  
...  

2018 ◽  
Vol 2 (2) ◽  
pp. 118-127 ◽  
Author(s):  
Chris A. Rogers ◽  
Lauren J. Scott ◽  
Barnaby C. Reeves ◽  
Susan Downes ◽  
Andrew J. Lotery ◽  
...  

2001 ◽  
Vol 19 (3) ◽  
pp. 843-850 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. S. Gordon ◽  
K. Margolin ◽  
M. Talpaz ◽  
G. W. Sledge ◽  
E. Holmgren ◽  
...  

PURPOSE: We investigated the safety and pharmacokinetics of a recombinant human monoclonal antibody to vascular endothelial growth factor (rhuMAb VEGF) in patients with cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Cohorts of patients with metastatic cancer having failed prior therapy entered a phase I trial of rhuMAb VEGF administered by a 90-minute intravenous infusion at doses from 0.1 to 10.0 mg/kg on days 0, 28, 35, and 42. Patients underwent pharmacokinetic sampling on day 0 and had serum samples obtained during the subsequent 28 days. Response assessment was carried out on days 49 and 72. RESULTS: Twenty-five patients with a median Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0 were accrued. There were no grade III or IV adverse events definitely related to the antibody. There were three episodes of tumor-related bleeding. Infusions of rhuMAb VEGF were well tolerated without significant toxicity. Grades I and II adverse events possibly or probably related to study drug included asthenia, headache, and nausea. Pharmacokinetics revealed a linear profile with a half-life of 21 days. There were no objective responses, though 12 patients experienced stable disease over the duration of the study. CONCLUSION: rhuMAb VEGF was safely administered without dose-limiting toxicity at doses ranging up to 10 mg/kg. Multiple doses of rhuMAb VEGF were well tolerated, and pharmacokinetic studies indicate that doses of ≥ 0.3 mg/kg have a half-life similar to that of other humanized antibodies. Subsequent trials will explore rhuMAb VEGF alone and in combination chemotherapy.


BMJ ◽  
2012 ◽  
Vol 345 (jul04 1) ◽  
pp. e4203-e4203 ◽  
Author(s):  
R. J. Campbell ◽  
S. S. Gill ◽  
S. E. Bronskill ◽  
J. M. Paterson ◽  
M. Whitehead ◽  
...  

Retina ◽  
2011 ◽  
Vol 31 (8) ◽  
pp. 1449-1469 ◽  
Author(s):  
Margriet I Van der Reis ◽  
Ellen C La Heij ◽  
Yvonne De Jong-Hesse ◽  
Peter J Ringens ◽  
Fred Hendrikse ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
SERKAN ÖZEN ◽  
Hakan Koc ◽  
Hasan Burhanettin Kaptı ◽  
Murat Atabey Ozer

Abstract Purpose: To report the concomitant bilateral intravitreal anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (anti-VEGF) injection preference rates of patients before and after the Covid-19 outbreak and to evaluate whether this practice is safe when compared to unilateral injection. Materials and Methods: This is a single-center, retrospective study including consecutive series of 198 eyes of 112 patients received bilateral same-day (concomitant) or unilateral anti-VEGF injections of bevacizumab, ranibizumab, and aflibercept in the operating-room between January 2020 and January 2021. One-year medical record data including preference of bilateral over unilateral injection and adverse events were reviewed with 3-month intervals as before and after Covid-19 pandemic due to the labile Covid-19 outbreak course.Results: A total of 504 injections with 234 concomitant bilateral (%46) were administered to 112 patients. The study group consisted of 58 neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD- 63.7% had bilateral nAMD), 46 diabetic macular edema (DME- 67.3% had bilateral DME) and 8 macular edema complicating retinal vein occlusion (RVO- 25% had bilateral RVO) patients. Of the injections, 156 (31%) were bevacizumab, 144 (29%) were aflibercept, and 204 (40%) were ranibizumab. The mean follow-up time per patient was 7.4 ± 4.3 months (range 4-11 months) and the mean number of injections was 3.6 ± 2.1 (range 2-10). None of the patients experienced serious vision-threatening complications or non-ocular adverse events. 85% of patients whose both eyes involved strongly preferred concomitant bilateral injection during Covid-19 pandemic while it was %35 before Covid-19 (P<0.001). The ratio of the number of concomitant bilateral injections to a total of injections increased from 30% to 57% after Covid-19 (P=0.03). Only 3 patients (2.6%) requested alternating unilateral injections after receiving the second concomitant bilateral injections.Conclusion: Concomitant bilateral injection approach was preferred by the majority of patients and did not increase the adverse event rate when applied under meticulous precautions; This intravitreal injection option may be preferred during still ongoing pandemic to reduce the clinical visits of patients at risk of Covid-19 related mortality due to their comorbidities and age.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document