Psychometric Comparisons of the Quality of Life after Brain Injury between Individuals with Mild and Those with Moderate/Severe Traumatic Brain Injuries

2019 ◽  
Vol 36 (1) ◽  
pp. 126-134 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yu-Jun Chang ◽  
Wen-Miin Liang ◽  
Wen-Yu Yu ◽  
Mau-Roung Lin
2020 ◽  
Vol 10 (6) ◽  
pp. 335-345
Author(s):  
Sophie Robert

Abstract Traumatic brain injury is an increasing cause of morbidity worldwide. Neuropsychiatric impairments, such as behavioral dysregulation and depression, have significant impacts on recovery, functional outcomes, and quality of life of patients with traumatic brain injuries. Three patient cases, existing literature, and expert opinion are used to select pharmacotherapy for the treatment of target symptoms while balancing safety and tolerability.


2004 ◽  
Vol 35 (1) ◽  
pp. 3-9
Author(s):  
Michelle McGraw-Hunter

As the number of persons with traumatic brain injury has increased in the United States, the focus placed on whether or not guardianship is appropriate for such individuals has expanded. The purpose of this paper is to provide knowledge for rehabilitation counselors on the issues of guardianship and to explore other, less intrusive methods to meet the needs of individuals with traumatic brain injuries while maximizing their independence. Issues such as competency and independence need to be addressed in order to determine the necessity of guardianship. The level of restriction that guardianship imposes on the individual must also be considered in regards to what is most appropriate for the person with a traumatic brain injury, with consideration given to alternatives to guardianship that are less restrictive and invasive. Alternatives to guardianship include designating a representative payee, choosing a durable power of attorney, or creating a trust for the person with a traumatic brain injury. Rehabilitation counselors should be knowledgeable of the issues surrounding guardianship and alternatives to guardianship in order to have a strong knowledge base regarding issues that may affect their clients with traumatic brain injuries and to be able to provide the highest quality of services to their clients.


2012 ◽  
Vol 26 (2) ◽  
pp. 213-216
Author(s):  
Charles Edmund Degeneffe ◽  
Mark Tucker

Objectiveto examine the perspectives of brain injury professionals concerning family members' feelings about the quality of life experienced by individuals with brain injuries. Participants: participating in the study were 28 individuals in leadership positions with the state affiliates of the Brain Injury Association of America (BIAA).Methodsan electronic survey containing open-ended questions was utilized to solicit qualitative statements concerning family members' feelings about the quality of life experienced by individuals with brain injuries. A constant comparative process was employed to identify themes expressed with a degree of consensus among respondents.Resultsthe following six themes were identified: (a) variability in quality of life; (b) the role of access to and quality of services in determining quality of life; (c) factors associated with negative quality of life; (d) the importance of social relationships in moderating quality of life; (e) post-injury factors influencing quality of life; and (f) the relationship between family socioeconomic status and quality of life.Conclusionsrespondents believed that families felt quality of life was more negative than positive, but was moderated by a variety of contextual factors. These findings reinforce the significance of enhancing professional services and program funding for individuals with brain injury.


2003 ◽  
Vol 25 (13) ◽  
pp. 722-731 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michel BÉdard ◽  
Melissa Felteau ◽  
Dwight Mazmanian ◽  
Karilyn Fedyk ◽  
Rupert Klein ◽  
...  

1995 ◽  
Vol 76 (12) ◽  
pp. 1113-1119 ◽  
Author(s):  
Carole R. Webb ◽  
Michael Wrigley ◽  
William Yoels ◽  
Philip R. Fine

2019 ◽  
Vol IV Série (Nº 20) ◽  
pp. 97-106
Author(s):  
Ana de Lima ◽  
Cristine Bonfim ◽  
Adriana Almeida ◽  
Fernando Gonçalves ◽  
Betise Furtado

2021 ◽  
Vol 3 (3) ◽  
pp. 42-45
Author(s):  
Y. Tahrir ◽  
A. Laaidi ◽  
K. Baayoud ◽  
M. Makhchoune ◽  
A. Chellaoui ◽  
...  

Background: Decompressive craniectomy is a surgical technique proposed in the treatment of intracranial hypertension refractory to medical treatment and engaging the vital prognosis of patients. Materials and methods: We conducted a retrospective study about 41 cases of decompressive flap in the neurosurgery department of CHU ibn Rochd of Casablanca between 2015 and 2018. Aim: This study aims to discuss the management of intractable ICH in adults, focusing on the role of DC in patients with traumatic brain and identify the different indications, contraindications and complications. Results: The results show a clear male predominance with an average age of 40 years. The initial GCS >7 was in 63%, and <7 in 36% of cases, anisocoria was present in 65%. The most frequent indication for craniectomy is a neurological worsening. The type of craniectomy performed in the majority of cases is a hemi craniectomy in 92% of cases. Concerning the prognosis, we observed 32% of deaths and 68% of survivors of which 39% of patients without sequelae GOS 5 and 32% with a moderate disability GOS 4. The moderate disability GOS 3 was found in 21% and one case in vegetative state GOS 2. Regarding immediate complications after craniectomy: 33% of patients presented convulsions, 12% a new homolateral hematoma, 49% a nosocomial pneumopathy and 10% a postoperative meningitis. Conclusion: Decisions to recommend DC must always be made not only in the context of its clinical indications but also after consideration of an individual patient's preferences and quality of life expectations.


2020 ◽  
Vol 37 (12) ◽  
pp. 1408-1417 ◽  
Author(s):  
Elisabeth J. Harfmann ◽  
Terri A. deRoon-Cassini ◽  
Michael A. McCrea ◽  
Amy M. Nader ◽  
Lindsay D. Nelson

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document