Enucleation of Bladder Wall Leiomyoma Through Single-Incision Pediatric Endoscopic Surgery with Glove Access Port

Videoscopy ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 26 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Maria Carmen Mora ◽  
Kaitlyn Ellis Wong ◽  
David Berge Tashjian ◽  
Kevin Patrick Moriarty ◽  
Michael Vincent Tirabassi
Author(s):  
Mark A. Gromski ◽  
Kai Matthes

This chapter introduces the concepts of natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (NOTES) and single-incision laparoscopic surgery (SILS). The field of NOTES has evolved over the past decade, and this developmental framework is also outlined to help better understand the current state of the field. NOTES describes a minimally invasive approach to surgical diseases in which instruments are passed transluminally to achieve access to the desired body. SILS is a minimally invasive approach carried out as an extension of traditional laparoscopic surgery. The anesthetic implications of NOTES and SILS are explained, including potential complications that are unique to each. Finally, future directions in developmental endoscopy are discussed to give a sense of what types of procedures may become available or commonplace in the coming decade.


2021 ◽  
Vol 108 (Supplement_4) ◽  
Author(s):  
R Fahrner ◽  
F Mazzola ◽  
M Adamina

Abstract Objective Since the first report of transgastric peritoneoscopic surgery in 2004, minimal invasive surgery (MIS) including conventional laparoscopy, natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (NOTES), single incision laparoscopic surgery (SILS), and robotic surgery have gained traction in general and visceral surgery. While laparoscopic surgery is now the gold standard in many institutions, other MIS approaches lag behind in spite of the enthusiasm of few promoters. The present study investigates the current role of NOTES and SILS in Switzerland. Methods All Swiss surgical departments where queried. Heads of department were asked to complete a detailed questionnaire regarding the use of NOTES and SILS techniques, reminders were sent twice. Results Of 93 departments queried, 63 (68%) answered the survey and most were public hospitals (92%). One third of general surgery departments and 46% of visceral surgery departments had the highest accreditation level A and V1, respectively. While up to 27% of the responding hospitals had performed NOTES in the past, only about 9% still use the technique today. Since January 2019, only two departments performed NOTES cholecystectomy, one department NOTES colectomy and three departments NOTES total mesorectal excision. The main reasons for not performing NOTES anymore were lack of perceived benefits, higher costs, increased morbidity in routine procedures, no patient demand, and the lack of surgical expertise. A similar picture was found regarding the use of SILS, with 37% of hospitals having past experience with SILS and only 13% still performing SILS procedures. Yet, significantly more institutions performed a broader range of SILS procedures today: SILS appendectomy (n = 2), SILS cholecystectomy (n = 4), SILS thyroidectomy (n = 1), SILS small bowel resection (n = 2), SILS colonic resection (n = 5), and SILS rectal resection (n = 2). The main reasons for not performing routinely SILS were similar to the rationale against NOTES. Conclusion Due to technical limitations and lack of perceptible benefits, NOTES and SILS are less frequently performed nowadays than they were in the past. Only a minority of departments are still performing NOTES and SILS, including cholecystectomies, appendectomies, thyroidectomies, and bowel resections. Whether the rise in use of robotic techniques correlates with the decrease of NOTES and SILS needs further investigation.


2016 ◽  
Vol 10 (3-4) ◽  
pp. 83 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jeffrey Law ◽  
Neal Rowe ◽  
Jason Archambault ◽  
Sofia Nastis ◽  
Alp Sener ◽  
...  

<p><strong>Introduction:</strong> We compared the outcomes of single-incision, robotassisted laparoscopic pyeloplasty vs. multiple-incision pyeloplasty using the da Vinci robotic system.</p><p><strong>Methods:</strong> We reviewed all consecutive robotic pyeloplasties by a single surgeon from January 2011 to August 2015. A total of 30 procedures were performed (16 single:14 multi-port). Two different single-port devices were compared: the GelPort (Applied Medical, Rancho Santa Margarita, CA) and the Intuitive single-site access port (Intuitive Surgical, Sunnyvale, CA).</p><p><strong>Results:</strong> Patient demographics were similar between the two groups. Mean operating time was similar among the single and multi-port groups (225.2 min vs. 198.9 minutes [p=0.33]). There was no significant difference in length of hospital stay in either group (86.2 hr vs. 93.2 hr [p=0.76]). There was no difference in success rates or postoperative complications among groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusions:</strong> Single-port robotic pyeloplasty is non-inferior to multiple-incision robotic surgery in terms of operative times, hospitalization time, success rates, and complications. Verifying these results with larger cohorts is required prior to the wide adoption of this technique. Ongoing objective measurements of cosmesis and patient satisfaction are being evaluated.</p><p> </p>


2019 ◽  
Vol 33 (4) ◽  
pp. 996-1019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Salvador Morales-Conde ◽  
Andrea Peeters ◽  
Yannick M. Meyer ◽  
Stavros A. Antoniou ◽  
Isaías Alarcón del Agua ◽  
...  

2013 ◽  
Vol 95 (2) ◽  
pp. 131-133 ◽  
Author(s):  
AJ Osborne ◽  
R Clancy ◽  
GWB Clark ◽  
C Wong

Introduction Single incision laparoscopic surgery (SILS) is established in many procedures but not in bariatric surgery. One explanation may be that SILS is technically demanding in morbidly obese patients. This report describes our technique and experience with single incision laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding (SILAGB). Methods Prospective data collection was performed on consecutive obese patients who underwent SILAGB between November 2009 and February 2011. A single 3cm transverse incision in the right upper quadrant was used for a Covidien SILS™ multichannel access port. The technique is described with a standard pars flaccida approach and the ‘tips and tricks’ needed for a wide range of candidates using standard laparoscopic equipment. Results A total of 29 patients (27 female) with a median body mass index of 41kg/m 2 (range: 35–52kg/m 2 ) and median age of 44 years (range: 22–57 years) underwent SILAGB. There were no ‘conversions’ to a standard laparoscopic technique. Two cases required the addition of one single 5mm port. The only complications were two postoperative wound infections (one with a port site infection requiring replacement of the port) and one faulty band requiring replacement. There were therefore two returns to theatre and no 30-day deaths. All patients were discharged on the first postoperative day. In this series, operative times reduced significantly to be comparable with the conventional laparoscopic approach. Conclusions SILAGB is safe and feasible in the morbidly obese. Proficiency in this technique using conventional laparoscopic equipment can be achieved with a short learning curve.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document