The decimal expansion of a number

2020 ◽  
pp. 167-207
Keyword(s):  
Author(s):  
Salah Eddine Rihane ◽  
Alain Togbé

AbstractA repdigit is a positive integer that has only one distinct digit in its decimal expansion, i.e., a number of the form $$a(10^m-1)/9$$ a ( 10 m - 1 ) / 9 , for some $$m\ge 1$$ m ≥ 1 and $$1 \le a \le 9$$ 1 ≤ a ≤ 9 . Let $$\left( P_n\right) _{n\ge 0}$$ P n n ≥ 0 and $$\left( E_n\right) _{n\ge 0}$$ E n n ≥ 0 be the sequence of Padovan and Perrin numbers, respectively. This paper deals with repdigits that can be written as the products of consecutive Padovan or/and Perrin numbers.


Author(s):  
Susan D'Agostino

“Keep it simple whenever possible, since 0.999…=1” presents and discusses a very short mathematical proof demonstrating the long-known result that 0.999…=1. The ellipsis in the number 0.999… indicates that this number repeats in an infinite decimal expansion. As such, this number is unwieldy to lug around, insert into equations, and even describe. However, the number 1 is not simply a good approximation for 0.999…., but rather the number 1 may be used in place of 0.999… without loss of information. Mathematics students and enthusiasts are encouraged to keep their mathematical and life pursuits simple whenever possible. At the chapter’s end, readers may check their understanding by working on a problem. A solution is provided.


2005 ◽  
Vol 89 (516) ◽  
pp. 458-460
Author(s):  
P. MacGregor
Keyword(s):  

Mathematics ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 8 (4) ◽  
pp. 639 ◽  
Author(s):  
Pavel Trojovský

In this paper, we prove that F 22 = 17711 is the largest Fibonacci number whose decimal expansion is of the form a b … b c … c . The proof uses lower bounds for linear forms in three logarithms of algebraic numbers and some tools from Diophantine approximation.


1986 ◽  
Vol 79 (1) ◽  
pp. 20-21
Author(s):  
Laurence Sherzer

The decimal expansions of 1/7 or 5/13 can be found immediately on the average electronic calculator. These decimal expansions are limited to six digits before they begin to repeat. But what do we say to students who want to explore the repeating properties of rational numbers? What would we answer if they asked for the decimal expansion of 1/17 or 3/23? Do we just say, “Keep dividing and you'll find the answer”? Hardly. Long decimal expansions are usually left to actuaries who don't want to mismanage thousands of dollars over the life of an annuity or mortgage table, or to spacecraft engineers who don't want to miss their targets in outer space.


2015 ◽  
Vol 9 ◽  
pp. 5293-5303
Author(s):  
M. K. Viswanath ◽  
M. Ranjith Kumar

1958 ◽  
Vol 10 ◽  
pp. 111-114
Author(s):  
F. R. Keogh ◽  
G. M. Petersen

Let {s(n)} be a real sequence and let x be any number in the interval 0 < x ⩽ 1. Representing x by a non-terminating binary decimal expansion we shall denote by {s(n,x)} the subsequence of {s(n)} obtained by omitting s(k) if and only if there is a 0 in the decimal place in the expansion of x. With this correspondence it is then possible to speak of “a set of subsequences of the first category,” “an everywhere dense set of subsequences,” and so on.


Author(s):  
Auke B. Booij

Abstract Real numbers do not admit an extensional procedure for observing discrete information, such as the first digit of its decimal expansion, because every extensional, computable map from the reals to the integers is constant, as is well known. We overcome this by considering real numbers equipped with additional structure, which we call a locator. With this structure, it is possible, for instance, to construct a signed-digit representation or a Cauchy sequence, and conversely, these intensional representations give rise to a locator. Although the constructions are reminiscent of computable analysis, instead of working with a notion of computability, we simply work constructively to extract observable information, and instead of working with representations, we consider a certain locatedness structure on real numbers.


1965 ◽  
Vol 12 (1) ◽  
pp. 5-8
Author(s):  
Leonard Pikaart ◽  
Charles Berryman

Pi was once assumed by ancient Hebrew “experts” to equal three. More careful observers subsequently added1/7, and by 1874 a decimal expansion to 707 decimal places was computed. Research by mathematicians proved that pi is an inational number, or, more precisely, transcendental. Research was slow in coming. The world was oriented to “experts,” and their opinions were often so sacrosanct that simple observation was virtually taboo. Occasionally, observations demonstrated such obvious merit that new information was forced upon an unwilling world. As the advantages of observation became more apparent, it was realized that casual observation must rely upon chance occurrence. Some unknown genius deliberately created an event to be observed, and research was born.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document