Local Error Estimate and Variable Stepsize

Author(s):  
Alfredo Bellen ◽  
Marino Zennaro
2014 ◽  
Vol 55 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Jouke H. S. de Baar ◽  
Mustafa Percin ◽  
Richard P. Dwight ◽  
Bas W. van Oudheusden ◽  
Hester Bijl

Algorithms ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 13 (5) ◽  
pp. 113
Author(s):  
Peter Meisrimel ◽  
Philipp Birken

We consider initial value problems (IVPs) where we are interested in a quantity of interest (QoI) that is the integral in time of a functional of the solution. For these, we analyze goal oriented time adaptive methods that use only local error estimates. A local error estimate and timestep controller for step-wise contributions to the QoI are derived. We prove convergence of the error in the QoI for tolerance to zero under a controllability assumption. By analyzing global error propagation with respect to the QoI, we can identify possible issues and make performance predictions. Numerical tests verify these results. We compare performance with classical local error based time-adaptivity and a posteriori based adaptivity using the dual-weighted residual (DWR) method. For dissipative problems, local error based methods show better performance than DWR and the goal oriented method shows good results in most examples, with significant speedups in some cases.


1995 ◽  
Vol 10 (16) ◽  
pp. 2431-2438 ◽  
Author(s):  
T.E. SIMOS

Some two-step P-stable methods with phase-lag of order infinity are developed for the numerical integration of the radial Schrödinger equation. The methods are of O(h2) and O(h4) respectively. We produce, based on these methods and on a new local error estimate, a very simple variable step procedure. Extensive numerical testing indicates that these new methods are generally more accurate than other two-step methods with higher algebraic order.


2020 ◽  
Vol 26 (3) ◽  
pp. 171-176
Author(s):  
Ilya M. Sobol ◽  
Boris V. Shukhman

AbstractA crude Monte Carlo (MC) method allows to calculate integrals over a d-dimensional cube. As the number N of integration nodes becomes large, the rate of probable error of the MC method decreases as {O(1/\sqrt{N})}. The use of quasi-random points instead of random points in the MC algorithm converts it to the quasi-Monte Carlo (QMC) method. The asymptotic error estimate of QMC integration of d-dimensional functions contains a multiplier {1/N}. However, the multiplier {(\ln N)^{d}} is also a part of the error estimate, which makes it virtually useless. We have proved that, in the general case, the QMC error estimate is not limited to the factor {1/N}. However, our numerical experiments show that using quasi-random points of Sobol sequences with {N=2^{m}} with natural m makes the integration error approximately proportional to {1/N}. In our numerical experiments, {d\leq 15}, and we used {N\leq 2^{40}} points generated by the SOBOLSEQ16384 code published in 2011. In this code, {d\leq 2^{14}} and {N\leq 2^{63}}.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document