Gender and Math Development

Author(s):  
Julianne Herts ◽  
Susan C. Levine

A great deal of research has examined math development in males versus females. Some studies indicate that males do better on standardized tests of mathematics achievement, whereas females get better grades in math class than males. Other studies find no gender differences in math development, or that differences depend on factors such as the type of math problem included on the tests. Further, there is evidence that gender differences in math test performance are not stable over time, with accumulating evidence that these differences are narrowing in more recent cohorts. In addition to evidence concerning sex differences in math grades and test performance, there is evidence that there are sex differences in math attitudes, with females showing higher levels of math anxiety and less confidence in their math ability than males, controlling for their math performance. Additionally, there is evidence that stereotypes exist such that teachers and parents believe that males are better at math than females, even when males and females have comparable levels of math skill. Moreover, when this math stereotype is activated before taking a math test, stereotype threat ensues and female performance is negatively affected. A wide range of factors, including biological differences, sociocultural factors, including stereotypes, and differences in math attitudes and interests, are likely to act in concert to account for male-female differences in mathematics achievement and decisions to enter math-intensive careers.

2019 ◽  
Vol 10 (1) ◽  
pp. 12 ◽  
Author(s):  
Martina Rahe ◽  
Claudia Quaiser-Pohl

In mental rotation, males consistently outperform females in performance and confidence. Both can affect math anxiety. In the present study, 107 undergraduate students (85 female) solved a mental-rotation test either with cube (C-MRT) or pellet (P-MRT) figures as stimulus material, then reported their confidence in their ability in the test, and solved a math test. Males performed better than females in both test versions: In the C-MRT, with a large effect, and in the P-MRT, with a small effect, and reported higher scores in their confidence. In math test performance, males scored higher than females when they solved the math test after the C-MRT but not after the P-MRT. The interactions of gender and stimulus material were not significant. Correlations between confidence and math test performance were large for males and not significant for females. Stereotype threat and lift effects are discussed as possible reasons for the varying effects of the stimulus material on the MRT performance of male and female participants.


1988 ◽  
Vol 81 (7) ◽  
pp. 533-537
Author(s):  
Shiela M. Strauss

With the advent of both the women's movement and a heightened national nterest in educational excellence, scholary attention has been focused on the success of females in mathematics. Sells (1978) Identified mathematics as the “critical filter” that could limit the range of career choices available to those who do not take an adequate number of high school mathematics courses. Casserly and Rock (1979) looked at factors that differentiate girls who enroll in Advanced Placement mathematics courses from those who do not. Studies of Fennema and Sherman (1977) demonstrated that gender differences in mathematics achievement are substantially reduced when the number of mathematics courses is controlled. Benbow and Stanley (1982), however, found that sex differences in mathematics achievement did not reflect differential mathematics course taking. Their study involved students in the Study of Mathematically Precocious Youth (SMPY) who, as seventh and eighth graders, scored as well as a national sample of eleventh- and twelfth-grade females on the S.A.T. mathematics and verbal tests


2016 ◽  
Vol 35 (1-2) ◽  
pp. 47-56 ◽  
Author(s):  
Christie Stewart ◽  
Melissa M. Root ◽  
Taylor Koriakin ◽  
Dowon Choi ◽  
Sarah R. Luria ◽  
...  

This study investigated developmental gender differences in mathematics achievement, using the child and adolescent portion (ages 6-19 years) of the Kaufman Test of Educational Achievement–Third Edition (KTEA-3). Participants were divided into two age categories: 6 to 11 and 12 to 19. Error categories within the Math Concepts & Applications and Math Computation subtests of the KTEA-3 were factor analyzed and revealed five error factors. Multiple ANOVA of the error factor scores showed that, across both age categories, female and male mean scores were not significantly different across four error factors: math calculation, geometric concepts, basic math concepts, and addition. They were significantly different on the complex math problems error factor, with males performing better at the p < .05 significance level for the 6 to 11 age group and at the p < .001 significance level for the 12 to 19 age group. Implications in light of gender stereotype threat are discussed.


1999 ◽  
Vol 24 (3) ◽  
pp. 181-266 ◽  
Author(s):  
James M. Royer ◽  
Loel N. Tronsky ◽  
Yan Chan ◽  
Stanley J. Jackson ◽  
Horace Marchant

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document