Rural Social Movements in Brazil in the Second Half of the 20th Century: From the Peasant Leagues to the Landless Workers’ Movement

Author(s):  
Leonilde Servolo de Medeiros

The struggle for land pervades Brazilian history, but it was not until the 1950s that various groups coalesced, thus forging the basis of a national peasant movement. Prior to the military dictatorship, small farmers associations and Peasant Leagues, irrespective of their strategies, had placed agrarian reform in the public spotlight. Since then, the issue has become the driving force for rural social movements. The 1964 coup violently suppressed these organizations, persecuting peasant and rural labor union activists. At the same time, it created legal mechanisms to make land expropriation viable while giving incentives for massive technological modernization in rural areas. It also encouraged the occupation of frontier zones by corporations. Such initiatives aggravated the land issue in the country in areas of recent and historical occupation rather than alleviating it. By the late 1970s, new actors emerged, putting land disputes back onto the political arena: landless workers, rubber tappers, small farmers, squatters, and the indigenous peoples. New organizations emerged, sometimes in opposition to rural workers’ unions, which performed a relevant role during the dictatorship while at other times working from within them. One of these emerging actors was the Landless Rural Workers’ Movement (Movimento dos Trabalhadores Rurais sem Terra, MST), which stood out nationally and internationally due to its innovative approach in terms of strategies such as land occupations and encampments, and in the late 1990s by building networks with other organizations worldwide, as is the case with the Via Campesina. In parallel to that, family farmers also became politicized as they demanded public policies through union organizations to survive in a rural environment controlled by large entrepreneurs.

Caderno CRH ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 34 ◽  
pp. 021007
Author(s):  
Iolanda Araújo Ferreira dos Santos ◽  
Janaina Betto

<p>Este artigo apresenta uma reflexão sobre alternativas políticas que mulheres camponesas vêm construindo em sua atuação em movimentos sociais rurais no Brasil (no Movimento de Mulheres Camponesas e no Movimento dos Trabalhadores Rurais Sem Terra). A partir de revisão bibliográfica, análise documental, entrevistas e participação em eventos, buscamos compreender como as dirigentes camponesas, organizadas politicamente, têm procurado alternativas às desigualdades nas relações de gênero no meio rural e pensado<br />a construção do feminismo tendo em vista suas vivências no campo. Entendemos que suas reivindicações levam a uma política própria, criada por mulheres para toda a sociedade, da qual emerge esse feminismo ainda em elaboração, mas que já afirma a busca por novas relações de gênero, de produção e com a natureza, a partir das práticas cotidianas do “modo de vida” das mulheres camponesas. Mesmo diante do avanço do neoconservadorismo no Brasil, essas mulheres estão construindo o feminismo camponês e popular como<br />movimento de autonomia e esperança.</p><p><strong>RURAL SOCIAL MOVEMENTS AND FEMINISM: paths and dialogues in the construction of popular peasant feminism</strong><br /><br />This article discusses political alternatives proposed by peasant women during rural social movements in Brazil, such as the Landless Workers Movement (MST) and the Peasant Women Movement (MMC). From bibliographic review,<br />document analysis, interviews, and participation in events, we sought to understand how politically organized peasant women leaders have articulated<br />alternatives to gender inequalities in rural areas and constructed feminism from their experiences in the country field. We perceive that their claims lead to a particular policy, created by women, but aimed for the overall society. From such policy emerges this feminism that, although under construction, already states the search for new gender, production, and nature relations, based on the daily practices of the peasant women. Despite the advance of neoconservatism in Brazil, these women have been building the popular peasant feminism as a movement of autonomy and hope.</p><p>Keywords: Peasant Feminism. Gender. Peasantry. Rural Women. Hope.</p><p><strong>DES MOUVEMENTS SOCIAUX RURAUX ET DES FÉMINISMES: parcours et dialogues dans la construction du féminisme paysan et populaire</strong><br /><br />Cet article refléchit sur des alternatives politiques dont des femmes paysannes sont en train de construire le long des mouvements sociaux ruraux au Brésil(Mouvement des Travailleurs Ruraux Sans-Terre – MST et dans le Mouvement des Femmes Paysannes – MMC).De la revue bibliographique, de l’analyse des documents, de l’ouverture et de la participation à des événements, nous avons cherché à comprendre comment les femmes leaders paysannes politiquement organisées réfléchissent elles-mêmes aux alternatives aux inégalités dans les relations de genre en milieu rural et à la construction du féminisme depuis leurs expériences dans le pays champ. On comprend que leurs<br />revendications ménent à une politique propre, édifié par des femmes pour toute la societé, d’où émerge ce féminisme encore en construction, mais que affirme<br />déjà la recherche de: nouvelles rélations de genre, nouvelles rélations de production et avec la nature, depuis les pratiques quotidiennes du mode de vie<br />des femmes paysannes. Même devant le progrès du néoconservatisme au Brésil, ces femmes sont en train de construire leféminismepaysan et populaireen tant<br />quemouvement d’autonomie et espoir.</p><p>Motsclés: Féminisme Paysan. Genre. Paysannerie. Femmes Rurales. Espoir.</p>


Author(s):  
Adalberto Penha de Paula ◽  
Marina Comerlatto da Rosa

This paper discusses Rural Education and its relation with the field social movements, from the education reality in a settlement of the Landless Rural Workers’ Movement. Its starting point is the school processes related to the Youth and Adult Education in the countryside, considering the education policies registered in the documents that guide the teaching practices carried out in the routine of the field school. It is based on the conception of education and school for Rural Education and the MST pedagogical practices, that is, pedagogical and philosophical principles that support the fight for land and for the right to education within this field social movement. The study problematizes the documents produced by the Education Secretariat of the State of Paraná, the materials produced by the MST and the academic production on Rural Education and Youth and Adult Education. Finally, the results point out the government’s disregard with the Rural Education and evidences that with the advent of social movements a strong pro-education movement appeared in Brazil, one which fights for the guarantee of the rights of the peasants, the waters and the forests.


Author(s):  
Sarah Sarzynski

This chapter examines how discourses of religious practices and beliefs of messianism and Catholic radicalism functioned to both unite rural workers and criminalize the rural social movements, while also coding o Nordeste as fanatical and non-modern. By connecting films and popular culture to rural social movement publications and U.S. and Brazilian government documents, the chapter shows the conflicting ways in which political and cultural actors resurrected the historical messianic movement and war of Canudos (1896-7) in the 1960s. Conservatives emphasized the “fanatical” features of social movement leaders and participants, mobilizing the dominant stereotype of Nordestinos as religiously devious. Rural social movements established their own religiously based narrative of a revolutionary Jesus who fought against the wealthy for the poor. The radicalization of Catholic doctrine along with debates about the meaning of past struggles in the Northeast such as Canudos both shifted and upheld the prevailing constructions of Northeastern Brazil.


Terr Plural ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 14 ◽  
pp. 1-22
Author(s):  
Raimunda Áurea Dias Sousa ◽  
Maria Arlandia Reis Silva

The understanding that the achievement of education is as important as the occupation of a latifundio is part of a continuous construction within the social movements of the countryside, particularly, in the MST (Landless Rural Workers Movement). Thus, this paper aims to analyze Education in/of Country as a public policy in coping with the inequalities historically fierce by the city-countryside division, while resisting the educational model imposed by the agrarian bourgeoisie. The results indicate that educational policies only have meaning when thought with the subjects, and not for the subjects – especially those in the countryside, who have historically been excluded from the right to an education that was not merely presential. In this sense, Countryside Education takes an important role in the dispute of hegemony of country design, society, and human formation.


2007 ◽  
Vol 72 (1) ◽  
pp. 63-89 ◽  
Author(s):  
Salvador A.M. Sandoval

AbstractThis article examines recent changes in working-class collective actions. First it explains which were the main causes for the decline of traditional labor union militancy resulting from effects of economic stabilization, neoliberalization, and globalization on those key segments of labor movement that accounted for the backbone of union militancy as in the case of the automotive workers, bank workers, steelworkers, and civil servants of the Brazilian economy during the decade of the 1990s. Secondly, the article analyzes the emergence of alternative forms of worker contention among the urban informal sector and the rural workers through the landless workers movement, which also have been affected by the processes of neoliberalization and globalization, but unlike the workers in the formal sector, these continue to contend for worker entitlements and introduce new forms of worker organization different from the conventional union organizations upon which is based the Brazilian labor movement.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document