RE: “SUPPORTIVE HOUSING AND ITS RELATIONSHIP WITH DIABETES DIAGNOSIS AND MANAGEMENT AMONG HOMELESS PERSONS IN NEW YORK CITY”

2019 ◽  
Vol 188 (9) ◽  
pp. 1759-1759
Author(s):  
Steven S Coughlin ◽  
Marlo Vernon ◽  
Lufei Young
2019 ◽  
Vol 188 (6) ◽  
pp. 1120-1129 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sungwoo Lim ◽  
Sara A Miller-Archie ◽  
Tejinder P Singh ◽  
Winfred Y Wu ◽  
Sarah C Walters ◽  
...  

2018 ◽  
Vol 22 (9) ◽  
pp. 3083-3090 ◽  
Author(s):  
Christopher T. Lee ◽  
Andrea Winquist ◽  
Ellen W. Wiewel ◽  
Sarah Braunstein ◽  
Hannah T. Jordan ◽  
...  

2018 ◽  
Vol 53 (5) ◽  
pp. 3437-3454 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sungwoo Lim ◽  
Tejinder P. Singh ◽  
Gerod Hall ◽  
Sarah Walters ◽  
L. Hannah Gould

2002 ◽  
Vol 53 (6) ◽  
pp. 719-723 ◽  
Author(s):  
Larry A. Nuttbrock ◽  
Andrew Rosenblum ◽  
Stephen Magura ◽  
Hunter L. McQuistion

PLoS ONE ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 9 (10) ◽  
pp. e109112 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sungwoo Lim ◽  
Sue M. Marcus ◽  
Tejinder P. Singh ◽  
Tiffany G. Harris ◽  
Amber Levanon Seligson

2005 ◽  
Vol 30 (4) ◽  
pp. 74-77
Author(s):  
Rosanne Haggerty ◽  
Ellen Goetz

Common Ground's vision of supportive housing, as exemplified by The Prince George, is comprehensive, cost-effective, aesthetically pleasing and community-minded. Along with its other programmes throughout New York City and in Connecticut, The Prince George is helping Common Ground (CG) solve homelessness. CG believes that transitioning out of homelessness requires more than a home, more than good health, more than a job and more than a supportive community - the entire package is necessary. And that's exactly what The Prince George provides: a comprehensive support system designed to help people regain lives of stability and independence.


1988 ◽  
Vol 17 (3-4) ◽  
pp. 90-98 ◽  
Author(s):  
Annette Benedict ◽  
Jeffrey S. Shaw ◽  
Leanne G. Rivlin

Attitude questionnaires were administered to a sample of New York City residents and a suburban sample who worked in New York City (n = 112 for each). While overall attitudes toward the homeless were sympathetic, feelings about a shelter for the homeless in one's neighborhood were not favorable. Feelings toward a shelter were unfavorable regardless of whether the shelter was to serve “over 20” or “up to 10” homeless persons. Despite demographic differences on income, age, time living in the New York City area and education, the two samples differed significantly on only two responses related to attitudes or to experiences with the homeless. New York City residents rated their attitudes toward the elderly as more sympathetic than did suburban residents (p .05), though both samples reported very favorable attitudes. Also, a greater proportion of the New York City residents, 76.7%, as opposed to 52.8% for suburban residents, stated that the situation of the homeless had gotten worse in the past few years (p .001). To examine the relationships between attitude responses and other variables, factor analyses were carried out for each sample on those variables that correlated significantly with the attitude measures. Composite variables based on these factors revealed that, for both New York City and suburban residents, significantly more favorable attitudes were obtained for those respondents who had given money to the homeless and who had used the media and their own reading in forming an opinion about the homeless.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document