scholarly journals Foliar Sprays to Control Insects on Spring Peppers, 1995

1996 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
pp. 137-137
Author(s):  
John Speese
Keyword(s):  
Agricultural Research ◽  
Evaluation Criteria ◽  
Row Spacing ◽  
Eastern Shore ◽  
Foliar Sprays ◽  
Marketable Fruit ◽  
Extension Center

Abstract Peppers were transplanted on 22 May at the Eastern Shore Agricultural Research and Extension Center, Painter, VA. Each plot consisted of two 25ft rows, planted on 3ft row spacing. Plots were separated from each other by an untreated guard row. Each treatment was replicated 4 times in a RCB design. Treatments were applied with a 3 nozzle boom backpack sprayer delivering 60 gal water/acre at 40 psi. Treatments were applied weekly beginning 19 Jul through 16 Sep. The aphidicides CGA 215944 and Provado were added to the pyrethroid treatments indicated in the table on 1,8, and 16 Sep after GPA populations had built up. Spod X was added to the Pounce treatments on the last four application dates to control BAW. The gallonage was increased to 73 gpa for the last 3 applications due to the growth of the plants. Evaluation criteria consisted of hand-harvests of market sized fruits from the more uniform row of each 2 row plot on the dates indicated in the table. This fruit was graded to remove any ECB or BAW damaged fruit and the remaining marketable fruit was weighed to determine yields. Numbers of GPA on 5 randomly picked leaves/plot were counted on the dates indicated in the table.

scholarly journals Foliar Sprays to Control Insects in Fall Peppers, 1995

1996 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
pp. 136-137
Author(s):  
John Speese
Keyword(s):  
Agricultural Research ◽  
Evaluation Criteria ◽  
Row Spacing ◽  
Plant Spacing ◽  
Eastern Shore ◽  
Hollow Cone ◽  
Foliar Sprays ◽  
Marketable Fruit ◽  
Extension Center

Abstract Peppers were transplanted on 31 Jul at the Eastern Shore Agricultural Research and Extension Center, Painter, VA. Each plot consisted of two 25ft long rows with 3ft between row spacing and 1ft between plant spacing. Each plot was bordered on each side by an untreated guard row and replicated 4 times in a RCB design. Treatments were applied on the dates indicated in the table with a backpack sprayer using 3 hollow cone nozzles/row and delivering 60 gal water/acre at 40 psi. Evaluation criteria consisted of hand-harvest of marketable fruit on 10 healthy, uniform-sized plants/row (.00062 acre) and GPA counts on 5 randomly picked leaves/plot on 06 Oct. Harvesting was done in this manner due to uneven stands in some plots due to the drought.

scholarly journals Foliar Sprays to Control Insects in Wheat, 1995

1996 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
pp. 318-318
Author(s):  
John Speese
Keyword(s):  
Agricultural Research ◽  
Evaluation Criteria ◽  
Aphid Species ◽  
Eastern Shore ◽  
Bare Ground ◽  
Foliar Sprays ◽  
Compressed Gas ◽  
Extension Center ◽  
Flat Fan Nozzle

Abstract Wheat was planted on 2 Nov, 1994, at the Eastern Shore Agricultural Research and Extension Center, Painter, VA. Plots were 25 ft long by 5 ft wide, with 7 inch spacing between rows. Each plot was separated from each other by 3 ft of bare ground and replicated 4 times in a RCB design. Insect pressure from all species was low this year. Treatments were applied on 5 May using a propane compressed gas backpack sprayer with a 3 flat fan nozzle boom which delivered 20 gal water/acre at 40 psi. Evaluation criteria consisted of counts of insects present on 6 ft of row. EGA was the dominant aphid species with low numbers of BCOA present. Numbers of both species were analyzed together as a complex.

scholarly journals Insecticides to Control Cucumber Beetles in Spring and Fall, 1996

1997 ◽  
Vol 22 (1) ◽  
pp. 130-130
Author(s):  
John Speese
Keyword(s):  
Heavy Rainfall ◽  
Agricultural Research ◽  
Evaluation Criteria ◽  
Eastern Shore ◽  
Bare Ground ◽  
Hollow Cone ◽  
Yield Data ◽  
Foliar Sprays ◽  
Extension Center ◽  
Spring Planting

Abstract Cucumbers were planted on 17 Jun and 12 Aug at the Eastern Shore Agricultural Research and Extension Center, Painter, VA. Each plot consisted of 2 rows 25 ft long with 5 ft spacing between rows. Plots were separated from each other by 10 ft of bare ground. Treatments were replicated 4 times in a RCB. Prior to planting, the Admire and Furadan treatments were applied in furrow using a single nozzle boom backpack sprayer. The foliar sprays were applied with a 3 hollow cone nozzle boom backpack sprayer delivering 45 gpa at 40 psi. The Adios AG treatments were broadcast over the appropriate rows using a hand-held shaker on the same dates as the foliar sprays. Application dates were 18 and 24 Jul and 2 Aug for the spring planting and 30 Aug and 9 and 23 Sep for the fall planting. Evaluation criteria were: beetle counts on a 6 ft row section of each plot. Dates with significant differences are recorded in the tables. No attempt was made to obtain yield data, because the growth of the crop across the field was highly variable due to heavy rainfall, especially in the spring planting.

scholarly journals Foliar Sprays to Control Insects on Potatoes, 1996

1997 ◽  
Vol 22 (1) ◽  
pp. 160-160
Author(s):  
John Speese
Keyword(s):  
Agricultural Research ◽  
Row Spacing ◽  
Eastern Shore ◽  
Bare Ground ◽  
Foliar Sprays ◽  
Extension Center

Abstract Potatoes were planted on 26 Mar at the Eastern Shore Agricultural Research and Extension Center, Painter, VA. Each plot consisted of 4 rows 20 ft long with 3 ft between-row spacing and 6 ft of bare ground between plots Treatments were replicated 4 times in a RCB.

scholarly journals Azadirachtin (Align) to Control CPB on Potatoes, 1994

1995 ◽  
Vol 20 (1) ◽  
pp. 126-126
Author(s):  
John Speese
Keyword(s):  
First Generation ◽  
Agricultural Research ◽  
Block Design ◽  
Evaluation Criteria ◽  
Row Spacing ◽  
Life Stages ◽  
Eastern Shore ◽  
Hollow Cone ◽  
Randomized Complete Block Design ◽  
Extension Center

Abstract Potatoes were planted on 11 April at the Eastern Shore Agricultural Research and Extension Center, Painter, VA. Each plot consisted of two 25 ft rows on 3 ft row spacing, replicated four times in a randomized, complete block design. An untreated guard row separated each plot. Admire 2F was applied in furrow preplanting using a single hollow cone nozzle boom backpack sprayer. Foliar sprays were applied on the dates indicated in the table using a 3 hollow cone nozzle boom backpack sprayer delivering 60 gal water/acre at 40 psi. On 21 and 23 Jun, the entire test was sprayed out with Vydate L at 0.50 lb(AI)/acre and Furadan 4F at 1.00 lb (AI)/acre to control first generation CPB adults. Evaluation criteria and spray decisions were based on weekly counts of all CPB life stages present on 10 random stems/plot. Sprays were applied if the following thresholds were exceeded: 4 small larvae, 1.5 large larvae, or 0.5 adults/stem. Percent defoliation for each plot was rated on 16 Jun and both rows of each plot were harvested and graded on 20 Jul to determine yields.

Foliar Sprays to Control Lepidopterous Larvae on Cabbage, 1996

1997 ◽  
Vol 22 (1) ◽  
pp. 112-112
Author(s):  
John Speese
Keyword(s):  
Agricultural Research ◽  
Row Spacing ◽  
Eastern Shore ◽  
Foliar Sprays ◽  
Extension Center

Abstract Cabbage was transplanted on 21 Aug at the Eastern Shore Agricultural Research and Extension Center, Painter, VA. Each plot consisted of a single 25-ft-long row with 3 ft between-row spacing, bordered on each side by an untreated guard row. Treatments were replicated 4 times in a RCB design.

scholarly journals At Planting and Foliar Insecticides to Control Cucumber Beetles in Fall Cucumbers, 1994

1995 ◽  
Vol 20 (1) ◽  
pp. 92-92
Author(s):  
John Speese
Keyword(s):  
Agricultural Research ◽  
Block Design ◽  
Evaluation Criteria ◽  
Foliar Spray ◽  
Row Spacing ◽  
Randomized Complete Block Design ◽  
Cucumber Beetles ◽  
Cucumber Beetle ◽  
Marketable Fruit ◽  
Extension Center

Abstract Cucumbers were planted on 12 Aug at the Eastern Shore Agricultural Research and Extension Center, Painter, VA. Each plot consisted of a 25 ft long row planted on 5 ft row spacing, replicated four times in a randomized, complete block design. An untreated guard row separated each plot. Furadan 4F was applied in furrow at planting using a single nozzle boom backpack sprayer. The Payload 15G in furrow at planting treatments were applied using a hand-held shaker. Foliar sprays were applied using a 3 hollow cone nozzle boom backpack sprayer delivering 45 gal water/acre at 40 psi. Foliar spray dates were 31 Aug and 6 and 13 Sep. On 31 Aug, the Furadan 4F at planting plots were less defoliated than the other plots and dead and dying cucumber beetles were observed. These plots were, therefore, not sprayed on this date. Dead and dying beetles were also observed in the Payload 15G plots on 31 Aug. These plots were treated with a low rate of Asana on this date, since actively feeding beetles were also observed. Evaluation criteria consisted of counts of both species of cucumber beetle on a randomly chosen 6 ft (30 sq ft) section of row in each plot and estimation of percent defoliation in each plot on the dates indicated in the table. The marketable fruit in each plot was harvested on 4, 11, and 20 Oct and the total yields for the season are indicated in the table.

scholarly journals Comparison of Various Soil Insecticides And Foliar Sprays for Soil Insect Control in Sweet Pota-Toes, Painter, Va, 1995

1996 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
pp. 176-177
Author(s):  
John Speese
Keyword(s):  
Agricultural Research ◽  
Light Trap ◽  
Insect Control ◽  
Row Spacing ◽  
Insect Damage ◽  
Eastern Shore ◽  
Sweet Potatoes ◽  
Foliar Sprays ◽  
Soil Insecticides ◽  
Extension Center

Abstract Sweet potatoes were transplanted on 20 Jun at the Eastern Shore Agricultural Research and Extension Center, Painter. VA. Each plot consisted of 3 rows 20 ft long, planted on 3 ft row spacing. An untreated guard row separated each plot from each other. Treatments were replicated 6 times in a RCB design. In furrow and band treatments, and the initial foliar sprays were applied with a single nozzle boom backpack sprayer. Granular treatments were applied with a hand held shaker. The Mocap treatments were applied on 25 May to avoid phytotoxicity. The later foliar sprays were applied with a backpack sprayer using 6 flat fan nozzles/row and delivering 42 gal water/acre at 40psi. Thiodan sprays were applied on 7, 14, and 21 Jul. Sevin XLR was sprayed on 27 Jul in order to observe the restrictions on the number of applications allowed on the Thiodan label. Foliar sprays were applied in order to coincide with clickbeetle (adult wireworm) flights, as determined by the black light trap at Painter, VA. Layby treatments were applied on 26 Jul. On 11 Oct, the center row of each 3 row plot was harvested and 25 market sized roots were randomly selected, washed, and evaluated for insect damage.

scholarly journals At Planting and Foliar Insecticides to Control Insects on Snap Beans, 1994

1995 ◽  
Vol 20 (1) ◽  
pp. 66-66
Author(s):  
John Speese
Keyword(s):  
Agricultural Research ◽  
Block Design ◽  
Evaluation Criteria ◽  
Foliar Spray ◽  
Row Spacing ◽  
Hollow Cone ◽  
Foliar Sprays ◽  
Snap Beans ◽  
Randomized Complete Block Design ◽  
Extension Center

Abstract Snap beans were planted on 11 May at the Eastern Shore Agricultural Research and Extension Center, Painter, VA. Each plot consisted of two 25 ft rows planted on 3 ft row spacing and replicated four times in a randomized, complete block design. An untreated guard row separated each plot. Payload 15G treatments were applied pre planting in furrow using a hand-held shaker. Foliar sprays were applied with a 3 hollow cone nozzle boom backpack sprayer delivering 60 gal water/acre at 40 psi. Evaluation criteria consisted of counts of nymph and adult thrips on 10 trifoliate leaves/plot on the dates indicated in the table. The leaves were washed in soapy water, filtered through a Buchner funnel, and the thrips counted under a binocular dissecting microscope. A visual count of the number of PLH nymphs on 10 trifoliate leaves/plot was taken on 6 Jul. The first foliar sprays were applied on 8 Jun at prebloom and subsequent sprays were applied based on increasing thrips counts on the dates indicated in the table. When the Payload treatments required a foliar spray, they were treated with Orthene 75S at 0.50 lb (AI)/acre.

scholarly journals Comparison of Pymetrozine (Cga 215944) and Imidacloprid (Provado) Foliar Sprays to Control Aphids in Tomatoes, 1996

1997 ◽  
Vol 22 (1) ◽  
pp. 185-185
Author(s):  
John Speese
Keyword(s):  
Agricultural Research ◽  
Test Field ◽  
Single Application ◽  
Eastern Shore ◽  
Hollow Cone ◽  
Potato Aphid ◽  
Single Row ◽  
Foliar Sprays ◽  
Extension Center ◽  
Aphid Populations

Abstract Tomatoes were transplanted on 9 Aug at the Eastern Shore Agricultural Research and Extension Center, Painter, VA. Each plot consisted of a single row 20 ft X 5 ft, bordered on each side by an untreated guard row. On 1 Oct, heavy potato aphid populations developed in the test field. A pre-count of live aphids on 5 randomly picked compound leaves/plot was taken on this date and followed by a single application of all treatments. Treatments were applied with a backpack sprayer equipped with a 3 hollow cone nozzle boom and delivering 46 gal water/acre at 40 psi. To evaluate efficacy, the plots were sampled as previously described for the pre-count on the dates indicated in the table.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document