scholarly journals EFFICACY OF ACEPHATE AND BIFENTHRIN FOR CONTROLLING MOLE CRICKETS UNDER DIFFERENT MOON PHASE, 1997

1999 ◽  
Vol 24 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Y. Xia ◽  
R. L. Brandenburg ◽  
P. T. Hertl
Keyword(s):  
2000 ◽  
Vol 151 (11) ◽  
pp. 417-424 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ernst Zürcher

Ancient forest utilization regulations regarding felling dates and wood use are compared to the moon cycles. Furthermore, moon-phase related investigations with regard to germination behaviour, insect infestation and durability of the wood are presented.


1996 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
pp. 333-334
Author(s):  
P. T. Hertl ◽  
R. L. Brandenburg

1987 ◽  
Vol 80 (3) ◽  
pp. 659-665 ◽  
Author(s):  
R. L. Kepner ◽  
S. J. Yu
Keyword(s):  

1983 ◽  
Vol 76 (2) ◽  
pp. 278-281 ◽  
Author(s):  
E. L. Matheny ◽  
R. L. Kepner ◽  
K. M. Portier
Keyword(s):  

2011 ◽  
Vol 36 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Eileen A. Buss ◽  
Paul Ruppert

2004 ◽  
Vol 82 (12) ◽  
pp. 1854-1863 ◽  
Author(s):  
Samantha Stoffberg ◽  
David S Jacobs

On the basis of its external morphology, Myotis tricolor (Temminck, 1832) should be able to both aerial-feed and glean. Furthermore, this bat is known to use broadband calls of short duration, reinforcing the prediction that it gleans. However, results from this study indicate that M. tricolor does not commonly glean. This conclusion was reached after studying the foraging behaviour of M. tricolor in a flight room. We presented M. tricolor with mealworms, moths, mole crickets, beetles, and cicadas in a variety of ways that required either gleaning and (or) aerial feeding. Although M. tricolor readily took tethered prey, it did not take any of the variety of insects presented to it in a manner that required gleaning. We therefore compared its wing morphology and echolocation calls with those of several known gleaners, Nycteris thebaica E. Geoffroy, 1818, Myotis lucifugus (Le Conte, 1831), and Myotis septentrionalis (Trouessart, 1897), and an aerial forager, Neoromicia capensis (A. Smith, 1829). In a discriminant analysis wing-tip shape was the only variable to provide some degree of discrimination between species, with M. tricolor having more pointed wing tips than the known gleaners. Discriminant analysis of echolocation-call parameters grouped M. tricolor with the other Myotis species and separated it from N. capensis and N. thebaica. However, M. tricolor did not use harmonics as did the other Myotis species. The apparent failure of M. tricolor to glean might therefore be due to its relatively pointed wings and narrow-bandwidth echolocation calls, owing to the absence of harmonics in its calls.


1982 ◽  
Vol 65 (1) ◽  
pp. 192 ◽  
Author(s):  
James J. Williams ◽  
L. N. Shaw
Keyword(s):  

2010 ◽  
Vol 2010 ◽  
pp. 1-12 ◽  
Author(s):  
Stephen L. Webb ◽  
Kenneth L. Gee ◽  
Bronson K. Strickland ◽  
Stephen Demarais ◽  
Randy W. DeYoung

Few studies have documented fine-scale movements of ungulate species, including white-tailed deer(Odocoileus virginianus), despite the advent of global positioning system (GPS) technology incorporated into tracking devices. We collected fine-scale temporal location estimates (i.e., 15 min/relocation attempt) from 17 female and 15 male white-tailed deer over 7 years and 3 seasons in Oklahoma, USA. Our objectives were to document fine-scale movements of females and males and determine effects of reproductive phase, moon phase, and short-term weather patterns on movements. Female and male movements were primarily crepuscular. Male total daily movements were 20% greater during rut () than postrut (). Female daily movements were greatest during postparturition (), followed by parturition (), and preparturition (). We found moon phase had no effect on daily, nocturnal, and diurnal deer movements and fine-scale temporal weather conditions had an inconsistent influence on deer movement patterns within season. Our data suggest that hourly and daily variation in weather events have minimal impact on movements of white-tailed deer in southern latitudes. Instead, routine crepuscular movements, presumed to maximize thermoregulation and minimize predation risk, appear to be the most important factors influencing movements.


2008 ◽  
Vol 5 ◽  
pp. 164-171 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yan Zhang ◽  
Chang-hai Zhou ◽  
Lu-quan Ren

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document