scholarly journals Extended field radiotherapy, combined modality treatment or involved field radiotherapy for patients with stage IA lymphocyte-predominant Hodgkin's lymphoma: a retrospective analysis from the German Hodgkin Study Group (GHSG)

2005 ◽  
Vol 16 (10) ◽  
pp. 1683-1687 ◽  
Author(s):  
L. Nogová ◽  
T. Reineke ◽  
H.T. Eich ◽  
A. Josting ◽  
H.K. Müller-Hermelink ◽  
...  
Blood ◽  
2004 ◽  
Vol 104 (11) ◽  
pp. 1305-1305
Author(s):  
Andreas Engert ◽  
Heinz Haverkamp ◽  
Hans T. Eich ◽  
Andreas Josting ◽  
Beate Pfistner ◽  
...  

Abstract Purpose: The HD8 study of the German Hodgkin Study Group (GHSG) demonstrated that involved field (IF) radiotherapy is equally effective when compared with EF radiotherapy after four cycles of chemotherapy (2 x COPP/ABVD). Since there are indications that elderly patients with HD might fare worse depending on the type of treatment applied, we revisited the HD8 data for possible differences between younger and older patients. Methods and results: A total of 1204 patients were randomised to receive two double cycles of COPP/ABVD and either 30 Gy EF + 10 Gy bulk or 30 Gy IF + 10 Gy bulk. Of these, 98 evaluable patients were older than 60 years and 1038 patients were younger than 60 years. In general, there were more risk factors such as B-symptoms, elevated ESR, and poorer Karnofski index in the elderly group. On the other hand, there were fewer bulky tumours, large mediastinal tumours and a lower number of lymph node areas involved in elderly patients. The toxicity of treatment was more pronounced in elderly patients with 76 of 96 patients experiencing chemotoxicity Grade III or IV (79%) compared with 699 of 1018 (69%) in those younger than 60 years. After a median follow up of 52 months, the 5-year-FFTF was 85% in younger patients and 63% in patients older than 60 years (p <0.001). The 5-year-overall survival was 94% for patients younger than 60 years and 66% for patients older than 60 years (p < 0.001). In addition, patients older than 60 years treated with EF had a trend for worse FFTF and overall survival compared to those receiving IF radiotherapy. Conclusion: Event-free and overall survival of patients older than 60 years old are worse compared with younger patients. In particular, patients older than 60 years receiving EF radiotherapy had a poorer prognosis.


2005 ◽  
Vol 91 (6) ◽  
pp. 456-462 ◽  
Author(s):  
Paolo Frata ◽  
Michela Buglione ◽  
Salvatore Grisanti ◽  
Bartolomea Bonetti ◽  
Elisabetta Vitali ◽  
...  

Purpose To retrospectively analyze the outcome and patterns of relapse in localized extranodal non-Hodgkin's lymphoma of the head and neck (HN-NHL) after radiotherapy alone or combined modality treatment. Patients and Methods A retrospective analysis of 107 patients with HN-NHL was performed. Relapse patterns, overall survival (OS) and relapse-free survival (RFS) were analyzed. Only stage I (n = 50) and stage II (n = 57) patients were included with either low-grade (n = 21) or high-grade (n = 86) lymphoma. Fifty-nine patients were treated with radiotherapy (RT) alone and 48 patients received combined-modality treatment (CMT) consisting of chemotherapy (CHOP or CHOP-like) followed by radiotherapy. The volumes of irradiation included local field (n = 24), involved field (n = 13) and extended field (n = 70). The median age at diagnosis was 63 years (range, 17-86 years). Results The overall response rates (CR+PR) in the radiotherapy group and the combined modality group were 100% and 96%, respectively. With a median follow-up of 49.4 months, 29 of 59 patients after RT alone (37%) and 30 of 48 patients after CMT (62%) were disease-free. In the whole series the projected five-year OS and RFS were 58.7% and 61.8%. At univariate analysis of clinical variables with potential impact on survival including age, stage, histology, IPI score, single or combined treatment and volumes of irradiation, only age and, to a limited extent, type of treatment influenced OS (age ≤60 years 79%, >60 years 41%, P<0.001; RT alone 54.9%, CMT 62.8%, P = 0.0487) and RFS (≤60 years 75%, >60 years 50%, P<0.001; RT alone 54%, CMT 71%, P = 0.039). Better OS and RFS rates were obtained in patients with stage II and high-grade disease treated with CMT (five-year OS and RFS 63% and 69%, respectively; the corresponding values for RT alone were 38% and 34%). The final model of the multivariate analysis retained only age (≤60 years) as a significant prognostic factor for both RFS and OS ( P<0.001). In the whole series, the sites of relapse were mainly systemic (n = 32/40, 80%) and in-field relapses were rare (n = 3/40, 7.5%). Conclusion HN-NHL is characterized by a high risk of relapse, particularly at distant sites. Older patients have a significantly worse prognosis. Radiotherapy offers a very good local control rate although combined modality treatment possibly produces better RFS and OS, especially for stage II and high-grade disease. Better systemic approaches are warranted for a more consistent impact on survival in this particular subset of extranodal lymphoma. However, radiotherapy alone may offer a feasible and effective modality for patients who cannot tolerate more aggressive treatments. Extended-field radiotherapy and the treatment of a larger number of uninvolved lymph nodal regions does not confer a RFS or OS advantage, either after RT alone or after CMT.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document