scholarly journals Quantifying the Net Patient Experience Through the First Global Net Patient Survey: a Collaboration Between the International Neuroendocrine Cancer Alliance and Novartis

2014 ◽  
Vol 25 ◽  
pp. iv405 ◽  
Author(s):  
T. Kolarova ◽  
M. Sissons ◽  
J. Leyden
2021 ◽  
Vol 32 ◽  
pp. S150
Author(s):  
Z. Maravic ◽  
V. Fotaki ◽  
O. Mesalles Naranjo ◽  
E. Gasenko ◽  
I. Rawicka ◽  
...  

2017 ◽  
Vol 65 (4) ◽  
pp. 83-99 ◽  
Author(s):  
Vivienne Byers ◽  
Daragh Fahey ◽  
Carol Mullins ◽  
Carol Roe

BJPsych Open ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 7 (S1) ◽  
pp. S339-S339
Author(s):  
Jonathan Packer ◽  
Emma Fisher ◽  
Anne-Marie Simons ◽  
Kirsty Bolochowecki ◽  
Benita Roff ◽  
...  

AimsTelephone consultations have been in clinical use since the early 1960s and are increasing in frequency and importance in many areas of medicine. With the advent of the COVID-19 pandemic in 2020, the use of telemedicine consultations increased dramatically alongside utilization of other digital technologies. Despite promise and potential advantages for clinicians (including remote working, improved time management and safety) there are known drawbacks to telephone consultations for psychiatrists. This includes limitations to assessments of mental state and risk, with loss of non-verbal communication often cited as a point in favour of more sophisticated technologies such as video calling. By adopting telephone consultations to a greater extent during the initial months of the COVID-19 pandemic in the Coventry Crisis Resolution and Home Treatment Team (CRHTT), we aimed to assess the patient experience in telehealth, through a patient survey.MethodAfter an initial assessment or follow-up consultation with a medical practitioner from the crisis team, patients were invited to take part in a short questionnaire with a member of the administration staff. This consisted of eight questions on a Likert scale and three open questions for comments. Results were collated and analyzed via Microsoft Excel.ResultMost patients found the telephone consultations satisfactory, with more than 90% returning positive scores in understanding, convenience and overall satisfaction. All patients felt listened to and that their confidentiality was maintained; with all but one respondent willing to engage in further consultations via the telephone. Negative scores were typically returned for practical telephonic problems including poor signal, interference and background noise. In their comments patients expressed largely positive views about their experience with their clinician; analysis revealed key insights into the patient experience, demonstrating the convenience, comfort and flexibility possible with ‘telepsychiatry’.ConclusionPatient experience of telemedicine in a UK psychiatric crisis team is mostly positive, with clear advantages for both patients and clinicians. Our results show telephone consultations can be expanded to new patient assessments alongside follow-ups, enabling the team to reach a greater number of service users. This includes service users who are housebound due to infirmity, required to shield or have significant anxiety about the pandemic.


SpringerPlus ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 5 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Antoinette F. Davey ◽  
Martin J. Roberts ◽  
Luke Mounce ◽  
Inocencio Maramba ◽  
John L. Campbell

2019 ◽  
Vol 28 (10) ◽  
pp. S15-S20 ◽  
Author(s):  
Helen Mitchell ◽  
Diane Morrissey

Since 2005, when the first patients outside of a clinical trial were treated with trastuzumab at The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, a nurse-led service has been developed to facilitate and support a safe treatment pathway for patients. There have been significant developments in the number of patients treated, the mode of administration of the drug and patient choice regarding the location of treatment delivery. This article focuses on the change from intravenous to subcutaneous administration, considering patient experience and choice, particularly in light of the advent of biosimilar drugs, which will necessitate a return to the intravenous route. The relative costs of intravenous and subcutaneous administration are illustrated and the results of a patient survey presented, indicating a strong preference for subcutaneous trastuzumab.


BMJ Open ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 8 (2) ◽  
pp. e018690 ◽  
Author(s):  
Charlotte A M Paddison ◽  
Gary A Abel ◽  
Jenni Burt ◽  
John L Campbell ◽  
Marc N Elliott ◽  
...  

ObjectivesTo examine patient consultation preferences for seeing or speaking to a general practitioner (GP) or nurse; to estimate associations between patient-reported experiences and the type of consultation patients actually received (phone or face-to-face, GP or nurse).DesignSecondary analysis of data from the 2013 to 2014 General Practice Patient Survey.Setting and participants870 085 patients from 8005 English general practices.OutcomesPatient ratings of communication and ‘trust and confidence’ with the clinician they saw.Results77.7% of patients reported wanting to see or speak to a GP, while 14.5% reported asking to see or speak to a nurse the last time they tried to make an appointment (weighted percentages). Being unable to see or speak to the practitioner type of the patients’ choice was associated with lower ratings of trust and confidence and patient-rated communication. Smaller differences were found if patients wanted a face-to-face consultation and received a phone consultation instead. The greatest difference was for patients who asked to see a GP and instead spoke to a nurse for whom the adjusted mean difference in confidence and trust compared with those who wanted to see a nurse and did see a nurse was −15.8 points (95% CI −17.6 to −14.0) for confidence and trust in the practitioner and −10.5 points (95% CI −11.7 to −9.3) for net communication score, both on a 0–100 scale.ConclusionsPatients’ evaluation of their care is worse if they do not receive the type of consultation they expect, especially if they prefer a doctor but are unable to see one. New models of care should consider the potential unintended consequences for patient experience of the widespread introduction of multidisciplinary teams in general practice.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document