scholarly journals Effects of floral display size on male and female reproductive success in Mimulus ringens

2011 ◽  
Vol 109 (3) ◽  
pp. 563-570 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jeffrey D. Karron ◽  
Randall J. Mitchell
2015 ◽  
Vol 39 (1) ◽  
pp. 37-44 ◽  
Author(s):  
Edyta Jermakowicz ◽  
Beata Ostrowiecka ◽  
Izabela Tałałaj ◽  
Artur Pliszko ◽  
Agata Kostro-Ambroziak

Abstract In the presented study, male and female reproductive success was analyzed in relation to the population size, floral display and pollinators’ availability in natural and anthropogenic populations of the orchid Malaxis monophyllos (L.) Sw. Our results indicated significant differences between all investigated populations in parameters of floral display, including heights and number of flowers per inflorescence, as well the number of flowering individuals and their spatial structure. Additionally, populations differed both in male (pollinia removal) and female (fruit set) reproductive success, but only the fruit set clearly differentiated anthropogenic and natural populations. Despite the average flower number per plant being significantly higher in two of the anthropogenic populations, it was not related to the fruits set, which was significantly lower there. Moreover, our preliminary study concerning the potential pollinators of M. monophyllos showed a higher contribution of flies in natural habitats than in anthropogenic ones. Thus, we can suspect that the main factors influencing the level of female reproductive success in M. monophyllos populations are abundance of effective pollinators, as well as flower visitors, which may have resulted in a different level of pollen discounting in populations. Therefore, further studies concerning breeding system and pollination as important forces that shape demographic processes in M. monophyllos populations are necessary. Our results also indicate that suitable conservation methods in M. monophyllos should always include the preservation of potential pollinators, especially in these new, secondary habitats.


Heredity ◽  
2003 ◽  
Vol 92 (3) ◽  
pp. 242-248 ◽  
Author(s):  
J D Karron ◽  
R J Mitchell ◽  
K G Holmquist ◽  
J M Bell ◽  
B Funk

1991 ◽  
Vol 69 (2) ◽  
pp. 394-399 ◽  
Author(s):  
Pam G. Krannitz ◽  
M. Anwar Maun

Two components of the floral display of Viburnum opulus L. were manipulated to determine their effect on fruit initiation and maturation. We altered the size of the floral display by planting individual shrubs in groups of 1, 5, or 10 in 1985 and in groups of 2 or 6 in 1986. In addition, we changed inflorescence size by altering the number of sterile accessory flowers per inflorescence: 0, 4, or untreated in 1985 and 0 or untreated in 1986. The sterile-flower treatment did not explain a significant proportion of the variation in fruit initiation or maturation. In contrast, the plant-grouping treatment was significant in 1985 but not in 1986. The number and proportion of fruits initiated were higher in larger groups of plants than in small groups in 1985 (P < 0.0001 for analyses performed at group and plant levels). The proportion of fruits initiated in group sizes 1, 5, and 10 was 6.9, 15.0, and 22.7% per plant, respectively, and 4.3, 9.1, and 19.4% per inflorescence, respectively. The larger groups did not initiate or mature proportionally more fruits in 1986. Twice as much rain fell in 1986 as in 1985, and shrubs produced more fruits overall (32.2% fruit initiation versus 11% in 1985), but it is not clear why group size differences did not have an effect on fruit initiation and maturation in 1986. Within the plant-grouping treatment fruit initiation and maturation were always significantly correlated with flower number (P < 0.0001) in both 1985 and 1986, but the increase in the number of fruits initiated was not proportional to the increase in flower number. Key words: floral display size, fruit initiation, plant grouping, pollination, Viburum opulus.


Evolution ◽  
1988 ◽  
Vol 42 (3) ◽  
pp. 505 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mitchell B. Cruzan ◽  
Paul R. Neal ◽  
Mary F. Willson

2004 ◽  
Vol 18 (1) ◽  
pp. 116-124 ◽  
Author(s):  
R. J. Mitchell ◽  
J. D. Karron ◽  
K. G. Holmquist ◽  
J. M. Bell

Evolution ◽  
1988 ◽  
Vol 42 (3) ◽  
pp. 505-515 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mitchell B. Cruzan ◽  
Paul R. Neal ◽  
Mary F. Willson

2011 ◽  
Vol 296 (1-2) ◽  
pp. 21-27 ◽  
Author(s):  
P. Li ◽  
B. Q. Huang ◽  
R. W. Pemberton ◽  
Y. B. Luo ◽  
J. Cheng

Evolution ◽  
2006 ◽  
Vol 60 (2) ◽  
pp. 234-246 ◽  
Author(s):  
Johanne Brunet ◽  
Heather R. Sweet

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document