floral display size
Recently Published Documents


TOTAL DOCUMENTS

31
(FIVE YEARS 3)

H-INDEX

18
(FIVE YEARS 0)

2021 ◽  
Vol 11 ◽  
Author(s):  
Johanne Brunet ◽  
Andrew J. Flick ◽  
Austin A. Bauer

Plants exhibit a wide array of floral forms and pollinators can act as agent of selection on floral traits. Two trends have emerged from recent reviews of pollinator-mediated selection in plants. First, pollinator-mediated selection on plant-level attractants such as floral display size is stronger than on flower-level attractant such as flower color. Second, when comparing plant species, distinct pollinators can exert different selection patterns on floral traits. In addition, many plant species are visited by a diverse array of pollinators but very few studies have examined selection by distinct pollinators. In the current study, we examined phenotypic selection on flower color and floral display size by three distinct bee species, the European honey bee, Apis mellifera, the common eastern bumble bee, Bombus impatiens, and the alfalfa leafcutting bee, Megachile rotundata, foraging on Medicago sativa. To estimate phenotypic selection by each bee species and for all bees combined simultaneously and on the same group of plants, we introduce a new method that combines pollinator visitation data to seed set and floral trait measurements data typical of phenotypic selection study. When comparing floral traits, all bee species selected on the number of racemes per stem and the number of stems per plant, two components of floral display size. However, only leafcutting bees selected on hue or flower color and only bumble bees selected on chroma or darkness of flowers. Selection on chroma occurred via correlational selection between chroma and number of open flowers per raceme and we examine how correlational selection may facilitate the evolution of flower color in plant populations. When comparing bee species, the three bee species exerted similar selection pattern on some floral traits but different patterns on other floral traits and differences in selection patterns were observed between flower-level and plant-level attractants. The trends detected were consistent with previous studies and we advocate the approach introduced here for future studies examining the impact of distinct pollinators on floral trait evolution.


Flora ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 262 ◽  
pp. 151505
Author(s):  
Valeria Hernández-Villa ◽  
Heike Vibrans ◽  
Ebandro Uscanga-Mortera ◽  
Armando Aguirre-Jaimes

2018 ◽  
Vol 285 (1884) ◽  
pp. 20181239 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rebecca E. Irwin ◽  
Paige S. Warren ◽  
Lynn S. Adler

Native species are increasingly living in urban landscapes associated with abiotic and biotic changes that may influence patterns of phenotypic selection. However, measures of selection in urban and non-urban environments, and exploration of the mechanisms associated with such changes, are uncommon. Plant–animal interactions have played a central role in the evolution of flowering plants and are sensitive to changes in the urban landscape, and thus provide opportunities to explore how urban environments modify selection. We evaluated patterns of phenotypic selection on the floral and resistance traits of Gelsemium sempervirens in urban and non-urban sites. The urban landscape had increased florivory and decreased pollen receipt, but showed only modest differences in patterns of selection. Directional selection for one trait, larger floral display size, was stronger in urban compared to non-urban sites. Neither quadratic nor correlational selection significantly differed between urban and non-urban sites. Pollination was associated with selection for larger floral display size in urban compared to non-urban sites, due to the differences in the translation of pollination into seeds rather than pollinator selectivity. Thus, our data suggest that urban landscapes may not result in sweeping differences in phenotypic selection but rather modest differences for some traits, potentially mediated by species interactions.


2018 ◽  
Vol 105 (7) ◽  
pp. 1154-1164 ◽  
Author(s):  
Eric F. LoPresti ◽  
Jennifer I. Van Wyk ◽  
John M. Mola ◽  
Katherine Toll ◽  
Timothy J. Miller ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document