Differential sensitivity to drug use of peripheral vs. central reaction time stimuli

1986 ◽  
Vol 1 (3) ◽  
pp. 274-274
Author(s):  
L. Hartlage ◽  
E. Knowles
Author(s):  
Herschel W. Leibowitz ◽  
Charles N. Abernethy ◽  
Elsworth R. Buskirk ◽  
Oded Bar-Or ◽  
Robert T. Hennessy

The effect of heat stress on reaction time to centrally and to peripherally presented stimuli was determined for lean and obese subjects whose work levels on a treadmill in a heat chamber produced either a 2.5 or 5% loss of body weight in six hours. Peripheral reaction time improved with practice, but central reaction time was not affected. Obesity, eccentricity of the peripheral stimulus, and the level of dehydration did not have significant effects on reaction time. It was concluded that, for short periods of time, the effects of heat stress can be overcome for highly motivated and experienced subjects.


Author(s):  
K. Shankar Narayan ◽  
Kailash C. Gupta ◽  
Tohru Okigaki

The biological effects of short-wave ultraviolet light has generally been described in terms of changes in cell growth or survival rates and production of chromosomal aberrations. Ultrastructural changes following exposure of cells to ultraviolet light, particularly at 265 nm, have not been reported.We have developed a means of irradiating populations of cells grown in vitro to a monochromatic ultraviolet laser beam at a wavelength of 265 nm based on the method of Johnson. The cell types studies were: i) WI-38, a human diploid fibroblast; ii) CMP, a human adenocarcinoma cell line; and iii) Don C-II, a Chinese hamster fibroblast cell strain. The cells were exposed either in situ or in suspension to the ultraviolet laser (UVL) beam. Irradiated cell populations were studied either "immediately" or following growth for 1-8 days after irradiation.Differential sensitivity, as measured by survival rates were observed in the three cell types studied. Pattern of ultrastructural changes were also different in the three cell types.


2001 ◽  
Vol 120 (5) ◽  
pp. A409-A409
Author(s):  
H ELSERAG ◽  
M KUNIK ◽  
P RICHARDSON ◽  
L RABENECK

Ob Gyn News ◽  
2008 ◽  
Vol 43 (2) ◽  
pp. 42
Author(s):  
DOUG BRUNK

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document