scholarly journals Incorporating Availability for Detection in Estimates of Bird Abundance

The Auk ◽  
2007 ◽  
Vol 124 (1) ◽  
pp. 96-106 ◽  
Author(s):  
Duane R. Diefenbach ◽  
Matthew R. Marshall ◽  
Jennifer A. Mattice ◽  
Daniel W. Brauning
Keyword(s):  
Survey Methods ◽  
Distance Sampling ◽  
Sampling Period ◽  
Bird Abundance ◽  
Point Counts ◽  
Variance Estimators ◽  
Bird Survey ◽  
Detection Probabilities ◽  
Ammodramus Henslowii ◽  
Further Development

Abstract Several bird-survey methods have been proposed that provide an estimated detection probability so that bird-count statistics can be used to estimate bird abundance. However, some of these estimators adjust counts of birds observed by the probability that a bird is detected and assume that all birds are available to be detected at the time of the survey. We marked male Henslow's Sparrows (Ammodramus henslowii) and Grasshopper Sparrows (A. savannarum) and monitored their behavior during May-July 2002 and 2003 to estimate the proportion of time they were available for detection. We found that the availability of Henslow's Sparrows declined in late June to <10% for 5- or 10-min point counts when a male had to sing and be visible to the observer; but during 20 May-19 June, males were available for detection 39.1% (SD = 27.3) of the time for 5-min point counts and 43.9% (SD = 28.9) of the time for 10-min point counts (n = 54). We detected no temporal changes in availability for Grasshopper Sparrows, but estimated availability to be much lower for 5-min point counts (10.3%, SD = 12.2) than for 10-min point counts (19.2%, SD = 22.3) when males had to be visible and sing during the sampling period (n = 80). For distance sampling, we estimated the availability of Henslow's Sparrows to be 44.2% (SD = 29.0) and the availability of Grasshopper Sparrows to be 20.6% (SD = 23.5). We show how our estimates of availability can be incorporated in the abundance and variance estimators for distance sampling and modify the abundance and variance estimators for the double-observer method. Methods that directly estimate availability from bird counts but also incorporate detection probabilities need further development and will be important for obtaining unbiased estimates of abundance for these species. Incorporación de la Disponibilidad para la Detección en las Estimaciones de Abundancia de Aves

scholarly journals Variability in Grassland Bird Counts Related to Observer Differences and Species Detection Rates

The Auk ◽  
2003 ◽  
Vol 120 (4) ◽  
pp. 1168-1179 ◽  
Author(s):  
Duane R. Diefenbach ◽  
Daniel W. Brauning ◽  
Jennifer A. Mattice
Keyword(s):  
Survey Methods ◽  
Distance Sampling ◽  
Monitoring Program ◽  
Detection Rates ◽  
Species Detection ◽  
Point Counts ◽  
Grasshopper Sparrow ◽  
Transect Line ◽  
Detection Probabilities ◽  
Henslow's Sparrow

Abstract Differences among observers in ability to detect and identify birds has been long recognized as a potential source of error when surveying terrestrial birds. However, few published studies address that issue in their methods or study design. We used distance sampling with line transects to investigate differences in detection probabilities among observers and among three species of grassland songbirds: Henslow's Sparrow (Ammodramus henslowii), Grasshopper Sparrow (A. savannarum), and Savannah Sparrow (Passerculus sandwichensis). Our review of 75 papers published in 1985–2001 found that the most commonly used methods were fixed-width transects (31%, 23 papers) and fixed-radius point counts (20%, 15 papers). The median half-width of fixed-width strip transects used by researchers was 50 m, but our results indicated detection probabilities were <1.0 at distances >25 m for most observers and species. Beyond 50 m from the transect line, we found that as many as 60% of birds were missed by observers and that the proportion missed differed among observers and species. Detection probabilities among observers ranged from 0.43 to 1.00 for Henslow's Sparrow, from 0.44 to 0.66 for Grasshopper Sparrow, and from 0.60 to 0.72 for Grasshopper Sparrow for birds detected within 58–100 m of the transect line. Using our estimates of detection probabilities for Henslow's Sparrows among six observers in a computer simulation of a monitoring program, we found that bird counts from fixed-width transects required an additional 2–3 years of monitoring to detect a given decline in abundance compared to density estimates that used a method to correct for missed birds. We recommend that researchers employ survey methods that correct for detection probabilities <1.0.

Problems with Avian Point Counts for Estimating Density of Northern Bobwhite—A Case Study

2011 ◽  
Vol 2 (1) ◽  
pp. 117-121 ◽  
Author(s):  
Roger D. Applegate ◽  
Robert E. Kissell ◽  
E. Daniel Moss ◽  
Edward L. Warr ◽  
Michael L. Kennedy
Keyword(s):  
Count Data ◽  
Distance Sampling ◽  
Bird Species ◽  
Northern Bobwhite ◽  
Model Fit ◽  
Point Count ◽  
Point Counts ◽  
Occupancy Estimation ◽  
Detection Probabilities

Abstract Point count data are used increasingly to provide density estimates of bird species. A favored approach to analyze point count data uses distance sampling theory where model selection and model fit are important considerations. We used uniform and half normal models and assessed model fit using χ2 analysis. We were unsuccessful in fitting models to 635 northern bobwhite Colinus virginianus observations from 85 avian point locations spanning 6 y (P ≤ 0.05). Most observations (74%) occurred in the outermost (&gt;100-m) distance radius. Our results violated the assumptions that all observations at the point are detected. The assumption that birds were assigned to the correct distance interval also was probably violated. We caution managers in implementing avian point counts with distance sampling when estimating northern bobwhite population density. We recommend exploring other approaches such as occupancy-estimation and modeling for estimating detection probabilities.

scholarly journals A Double-Observer Approach for Estimating Detection Probability and Abundance From Point Counts

The Auk ◽  
2000 ◽  
Vol 117 (2) ◽  
pp. 393-408 ◽  
Author(s):  
James D. Nichols ◽  
James E. Hines ◽  
John R. Sauer ◽  
Frederick W. Fallon ◽  
Jane E. Fallon ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Detection Probability ◽  
Bird Species ◽  
Field Trials ◽  
Bird Abundance ◽  
Point Count ◽  
Point Counts ◽  
Avian Abundance ◽  
Detection Probabilities ◽  
Sources Of Variation ◽  
Double Observer

Abstract Although point counts are frequently used in ornithological studies, basic assumptions about detection probabilities often are untested. We apply a double-observer approach developed to estimate detection probabilities for aerial surveys (Cook and Jacobson 1979) to avian point counts. At each point count, a designated “primary” observer indicates to another (“secondary”) observer all birds detected. The secondary observer records all detections of the primary observer as well as any birds not detected by the primary observer. Observers alternate primary and secondary roles during the course of the survey. The approach permits estimation of observer-specific detection probabilities and bird abundance. We developed a set of models that incorporate different assumptions about sources of variation (e.g. observer, bird species) in detection probability. Seventeen field trials were conducted, and models were fit to the resulting data using program SURVIV. Single-observer point counts generally miss varying proportions of the birds actually present, and observer and bird species were found to be relevant sources of variation in detection probabilities. Overall detection probabilities (probability of being detected by at least one of the two observers) estimated using the double-observer approach were very high (>0.95), yielding precise estimates of avian abundance. We consider problems with the approach and recommend possible solutions, including restriction of the approach to fixed-radius counts to reduce the effect of variation in the effective radius of detection among various observers and to provide a basis for using spatial sampling to estimate bird abundance on large areas of interest. We believe that most questions meriting the effort required to carry out point counts also merit serious attempts to estimate detection probabilities associated with the counts. The double-observer approach is a method that can be used for this purpose.

A Comparison of Point Counts and Sound Recording as Bird Survey Methods in Amazonian Southeast Peru

The Condor ◽  
2000 ◽  
Vol 102 (4) ◽  
pp. 887-893 ◽  
Author(s):  
John Haselmayer ◽  
James S. Quinn
Keyword(s):  
Survey Methods ◽  
Sound Recording ◽  
Point Counts ◽  
Bird Survey

scholarly journals Combining Breeding Bird Survey and Distance Sampling to Estimate Density of Migrant and Breeding Birds

The Condor ◽  
2006 ◽  
Vol 108 (3) ◽  
pp. 691-699 ◽  
Author(s):  
Scott G. Somershoe ◽  
Daniel J. Twedt ◽  
Bruce Reid
Keyword(s):  
Forest Cover ◽  
Distance Sampling ◽  
Breeding Birds ◽  
Breeding Bird Survey ◽  
Breeding Bird ◽  
Point Count ◽  
Point Counts ◽  
Bird Survey ◽  
Bombycilla Cedrorum ◽  
Cedar Waxwing

Abstract We combined Breeding Bird Survey point count protocol and distance sampling to survey spring migrant and breeding birds in Vicksburg National Military Park on 33 days between March and June of 2003 and 2004. For 26 of 106 detected species, we used program DISTANCE to estimate detection probabilities and densities from 660 3-min point counts in which detections were recorded within four distance annuli. For most species, estimates of detection probability, and thereby density estimates, were improved through incorporation of the proportion of forest cover at point count locations as a covariate. Our results suggest Breeding Bird Surveys would benefit from the use of distance sampling and a quantitative characterization of habitat at point count locations. During spring migration, we estimated that the most common migrant species accounted for a population of 5000–9000 birds in Vicksburg National Military Park (636 ha). Species with average populations of >300 individuals during migration were: Blue-gray Gnatcatcher (Polioptila caerulea), Cedar Waxwing (Bombycilla cedrorum), White-eyed Vireo (Vireo griseus), Indigo Bunting (Passerina cyanea), and Ruby-crowned Kinglet (Regulus calendula). Of 56 species that bred in Vicksburg National Military Park, we estimated that the most common 18 species accounted for >8150 individuals. The six most abundant breeding species, Blue-gray Gnatcatcher, White-eyed Vireo, Summer Tanager (Piranga rubra), Northern Cardinal (Cardinalis cardinalis), Carolina Wren (Thryothorus ludovicianus), and Brown-headed Cowbird (Molothrus ater), accounted for >5800 individuals.

A COMPARISON OF POINT COUNTS AND SOUND RECORDING AS BIRD SURVEY METHODS IN AMAZONIAN SOUTHEAST PERU

The Condor ◽  
2000 ◽  
Vol 102 (4) ◽  
pp. 887 ◽  
Author(s):  
John Haselmayer ◽  
James S. Quinn
Keyword(s):  
Survey Methods ◽  
Sound Recording ◽  
Point Counts ◽  
Bird Survey

scholarly journals Estimating forest antelope population densities using distance sampling with camera traps

Oryx ◽  
2021 ◽  
pp. 1-7
Author(s):  
Rajan Amin ◽  
Hannah Klair ◽  
Tim Wacher ◽  
Constant Ndjassi ◽  
Andrew Fowler ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Survey Methods ◽  
Distance Sampling ◽  
Common Species ◽  
Camera Trap ◽  
Camera Traps ◽  
Individual Species ◽  
Survey Tool ◽  
Terrestrial Mammals ◽  
Detection Probabilities ◽  
The Status

Abstract Traditional transect survey methods for forest antelopes often underestimate density for common species and do not provide sufficient data for rarer species. The use of camera trapping as a survey tool for medium and large terrestrial mammals has become increasingly common, especially in forest habitats. Here, we applied the distance sampling method to images generated from camera-trap surveys in Dja Faunal Reserve, Cameroon, and used an estimate of the proportion of time animals are active to correct for negative bias in the density estimates from the 24-hour camera-trap survey datasets. We also used multiple covariate distance sampling with body weight as a covariate to estimate detection probabilities and densities of rarer species. These methods provide an effective tool for monitoring the status of individual species or a community of forest antelope species, information urgently needed for conservation planning and action.

scholarly journals Landbird Counting Techniques: Current Practices and an Alternative

The Auk ◽  
2002 ◽  
Vol 119 (1) ◽  
pp. 46-53 ◽  
Author(s):  
Steven S. Rosenstock ◽  
David R. Anderson ◽  
Kenneth M. Giesen ◽  
Tony Leukering ◽  
Michael F. Carter
Keyword(s):  
Distance Sampling ◽  
Field Studies ◽  
Empirical Models ◽  
Viable Alternative ◽  
Density Estimates ◽  
Abundance Index ◽  
Point Counts ◽  
Density Index ◽  
Conceptual Overview ◽  
Current Practices

AbstractCounting techniques are widely used to study and monitor terrestrial birds. To assess current applications of counting techniques, we reviewed landbird studies published 1989–1998 in nine major journals and one symposium. Commonly used techniques fell into two groups: procedures that used counts of bird detections as an index to abundance (index counts), and procedures that used empirical models of detectability to estimate density. Index counts rely upon assumptions concerning detectability that are difficult or impossible to meet in most field studies, but nonetheless remain the technique of choice among ornithologists; 95% of studies we reviewed relied upon point counts, strip transects, or other index procedures. Detectability-based density estimates were rarely used and deserve wider application in landbird studies. Distance sampling is a comprehensive extension of earlier detectability-based procedures (variable-width transects, variable circular plots) and a viable alternative to index counts. We provide a conceptual overview of distance sampling, specific recommendations for applying this technique to studies of landbirds, and an introduction to analysis of distance sampling data using the program DISTANCE.

Estimating Detection Probabilities from Multiple-Observer Point Counts (Estimación de Probabilidades de Detección a Partir de Conteos en Puntos Hechos por Varios Observadores)

The Auk ◽  
2006 ◽  
Vol 123 (4) ◽  
pp. 1172-1182
Author(s):  
Mathew W. Alldredge ◽  
Kenneth H. Pollock ◽  
Theodore R. Simons
Keyword(s):  
Point Counts ◽  
Detection Probabilities ◽  
Multiple Observer

Powerline easements through forests: a case study of impacts on avifauna

1998 ◽  
Vol 4 (1) ◽  
pp. 79 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jack Baker ◽  
Ross L. Goldingay ◽  
Robert J. Whelan
Keyword(s):  
Species Richness ◽  
Bird Community ◽  
Forest Habitat ◽  
Bird Abundance ◽  
Point Counts ◽  
Southeastern Australia ◽  
Total Species Richness ◽  
New Type ◽  
Forest Values

Powerline easements are typically a strip cleared of trees and tall vegetation to a width of approximately 50 m. They may affect avifauna by modification and fragmentation of forest habitat. We investigated the responses of the bird community to easements at three sites in southeastern Australia using 25 m radius point-counts spaced at 50 m intervals from the easement to 300 m inside the forest. The easements caused an absolute loss of habitat for forest avifauna, with abundance and species richness at the easement less than 20% of the forest values. Four species of easement opportunist and one easement specialist provided evidence that the easement represented a new type of habitat for avifauna. A barrier effect of fragmentation may occur for four species of easement avoiders. These were small to medium-sized terrestrial birds associated with dense ground and/or understorey cover. The edge effect of fragmentation was an adverse impact on forest avifauna. At the margin (25?125 m from the easement) of the forest, bird abundance, mean species richness and total species richness were significantly less than the corresponding values for the interior (225?325 m) of the forest. The mean abundance at the sites varied from 13.0?17.7 birds/ha and the species richness varied significantly among sites. The adverse impacts of powerline easements on native avifauna could be minimized by site-specific management which includes strategies to minimize the loss of forest habitat and to ameliorate the effects of fragmentation.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document