EP.FRI.535 A clinical audit of post-operative antibiotics prescription in uncomplicated perianal abscesses

2021 ◽  
Vol 108 (Supplement_7) ◽  
Author(s):  
Sarah Zhao ◽  
Ahmad Najdawi ◽  
Aggelios Laliotis ◽  
Rhys Thomas ◽  
Michael El Boghdady

Abstract Aims Management of perianal abscesses continues to revolve around prompt surgical drainage. The Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland (ACPGBI) guidelines state that all patients should have incision and drainage within 24 hours and antibiotics are not indicated in routine uncomplicated perianal abscesses. We aimed to study the antibiotics prescription after surgical drainage in a London university teaching hospital against the national standard.  Methods A single-centred retrospective analysis of all emergency surgical admissions for incision and drainage of perianal abscess was carried out for a 6 month period. Patients’ demographics, Co-morbidities, local and systemic complications and readmissions were studied.  Results A total of 36 patients, (mean age 43, 64% males) were included in this study, 21 received incision and drainage without antibiotics prescription, while 15 received empirical post-operative antibiotics. Indications for antibiotic therapy in this group included diabetes, immunocompromise, local complications (necrosis, cellulitis) and recurrence. There was no clear indication for antibiotics in 60% of patients who received them. 86% of patients had surgical drainage within 24 hours of presentation. One patient was readmitted for a second drainage 3 months later. Most common empirical agent used was co-amoxiclav (53%), followed by (33%) combination of co-amoxiclav and metronidazole.  Conclusion Although surgical drainage was generally carried out in timely manner according to guidance, there was excessive post-operative antibiotic prescriptions. Increase awareness of guidelines is required to improve antibiotic stewardship in these surgical patients in order to avoid unnecessary drugs’ prescription.

2021 ◽  
Vol 108 (Supplement_7) ◽  
Author(s):  
Sarah Zhao ◽  
Ahmad Najdawi ◽  
Aggelios Laliotis ◽  
Rhys Thomas ◽  
Michael El Boghdady

Abstract Aims Acute cutaneous abscess is a common surgical condition which mostly require incision and drainage. Despite this, there is no standardised national or international guidance on the post-operative antibiotics prescription. Traditionally, antibiotics are not indicated unless complications and/or risk factors such as immunocompromisation, diabetes or cellulitis exist. We aimed to study the local practice of the post-operative antibiotics prescription for cutaneous abscesses in a University teaching hospital in London. Methods A retrospective data collection of emergency general surgical admissions for a period of six months from July to December 2020 was carried out. All patients with superficial skin abscess were included in this analysis. Scrotal, breast and limb abscesses were excluded. Patients’ demographics, Co-morbidities, local and systemic complications were studied. Results A total of 149 patients presented during this period. Mean age was 40 (54% were male). Most common site of abscess was perianal (24%), followed by pilonidal, axilla, back, gluteal, neck, abdominal wall and groin. At total of 108 (72.5%) were managed surgically with incision and drainage, 70 (65%) got antibiotics and only 23 (33%) had indications for it (i.e. diabetic, immunocompromised, sepsis, cellulitis, MRSA carriage) = (χ2[1] =22.03, p<.0001). Co-amoxiclav was the most common post-operative empirical antibiotic prescribed in 61% of the patients.  Conclusions This study has identified significant variation in clinical practice regarding post-operative antibiotic usage in superficial abscesses. Further research is required in cooperation with microbiologists to develop standardised evidence-based treatment protocol for management of such common surgical condition.  


BJS Open ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 5 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Apoorva Khajuria ◽  
Tuba Rahim ◽  
Mariam Baig ◽  
Kai Leong ◽  
Apoorva Khajuria

Abstract Introduction Despite perianal abscess being a common presentation, certain aspects of its management remain controversial, especially the routine use of intra-operative swab cultures. Methods A retrospective review of patients that underwent incision and drainage procedures for a perianal abscess over a six-month period was undertaken. Results Over 6 months, 50 patients were identified. The male to female ratio was 3:1 and median ASA score was 1. Only 6/50 patients presented with recurrent abscess and 1 patient had history of inflammatory bowel disease. On the basis of operative findings, 39 patients (78%) had uncomplicated abscess (not associated with cellulitis, sinus or fistula); swab cultures were performed in 26 (67%) of these patients. All patients were discharged on the same day; microbiology reports did not impact the treatment and no patients were followed up in clinic post-operatively or presented with recurrence. The number of unnecessary microbiology swabs undertaken in this cohort equates to approximately 52 unnecessary swabs a year. The cost of one swab is £10.10p, which means £520 could potentially be saved annually. Conclusion Routine intra-operative swab cultures do not impact management decisions, add to unnecessary costs and therefore should not be undertaken in uncomplicated or first presentation of peri-anal abscesses.


Injury ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 47 (8) ◽  
pp. 1732-1736 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gele B. Moloney ◽  
Tiffany Pan ◽  
Carola F. Van Eck ◽  
Devan Patel ◽  
Ivan Tarkin

2012 ◽  
Vol 10 (8) ◽  
pp. S74
Author(s):  
Olivia Raglan ◽  
Parveen Jayia ◽  
Fiona Myint ◽  
Meryl Davis

2006 ◽  
Vol 88 (6) ◽  
pp. 576-578 ◽  
Author(s):  
Samuel CL Leong ◽  
Alison J Waghorn

INTRODUCTION The aim of this survey was to ascertain the level of competency and training of basic surgical trainees (SHOs) in performing incision and drainage of a perianal abscess (a minor surgical procedure). MATERIALS AND METHODS Questionnaires were sent to SHOs enquiring about preferred methods of incision and drainage and the teaching received to perform this procedure. RESULTS Of respondent SHOs, 10% did not receive teaching when performing their first incision and drainage and over half did not received any feedback from their trainers. A mere 65% received practical supervision. Use of the curette and de-roofing of the abscess are not routine methods used. In addition, 13% reported inadequate incision and drainage, which required a second procedure. CONCLUSIONS Competency-based training in minor surgical procedures benefits not only from didactic teaching, immediate supervision and appraisal but also from frequent practise. This was found to be lacking for incision and drainage of perianal abscesses by basic surgical trainees surveyed in the study.


2016 ◽  
Vol 33 ◽  
pp. 45-54
Author(s):  
Bahaa Nasr ◽  
Bénédicte Albert ◽  
Charles-Henri David ◽  
Ahmed Khalifa ◽  
Layal El Aridi ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document