TP7.2.4 Skin-to-gel is a safe and effective method to prevent patients sliding during minimally invasive colorectal surgery

2021 ◽  
Vol 108 (Supplement_7) ◽  
Author(s):  
Charlotte Florance ◽  
Yesar El-Dhuwaib ◽  
Matthew Miller

Abstract Aims Minimally invasive colorectal surgery often requires manipulating the patient position to facilitate exposure of the surgical field, such as a steep Trendelenburg position. However, this exposes patients to risks of sliding on the operating table. Preventive interventions are available, such as bean bags; we explore our experiences of gel pads within a district general hospital. Methods A retrospective analysis was performed of all colorectal patients undergoing laparoscopic resections over the last ten years, identifying complications associated with the use of intra-operative gel pads (skin-to-gel) with no shoulder support. Results Over 500 patients have undergone laparoscopic colorectal resections during this time, all utilising pressure-relieving gel pads. Patients are placed skin-to-gel, lying on a single torso-length gel pad laid directly on the operating table mattress. Dependent upon the operative approach, the legs can be placed in stirrups or maintained supine on table extensions. There have been no DATIX recorded skin-tears, pressure or position-related injuries. The pads have also proven to prevent patient movement on the operating table, negating the use of shoulder supports when adopting the Trendelenburg position. On discussions with theatre staff, the Consultant body and interrogation of the DATIX database, there has only been one reported incidence of slipping when a patient was left on the slide sheet on top of the gel pad. They are relatively inexpensive, durable and easily maintained, proving a highly cost-effective piece of equipment. Conclusion Gel pads have proven to be highly effective in preventing both pressure-related injuries and patient movement during laparoscopic surgery.

2013 ◽  
Vol 79 (6) ◽  
pp. 630-633 ◽  
Author(s):  
Scott R. Kelley ◽  
Bruce G. Wolff ◽  
Jenna K. Lovely ◽  
David W. Larson

Multimodal fast-track (FT) pathways for both open and laparoscopic colorectal surgery have been shown to improve gastrointestinal recovery, shorten length of stay, and decrease morbidity. The aim of our study was to determine if using alvimopan (Entereg)™ in the setting of a FT minimally invasive colorectal pathway is beneficial and cost-effective. All minimally invasive colorectal surgeries performed by one surgeon using a multimodal FT pathway with and without alvimopan were reviewed. Ninety total patients were identified, 64 patients treated without and 26 with alvimopan. Main outcomes included postoperative day tolerating a soft diet, return of gastrointestinal function, length of stay, 30-day readmission rate, and patient care, anesthesia, pharmacy, and combined cost. Tolerance of a soft diet, return of gastrointestinal function, and length of stay were all shorter and showed significance in the alvimopan group (mean 2.1 vs 2.8 days, mean 1.5 vs 2.4 days, and mean 3.5 vs 4.5 days, respectively) ( P = 0.0197, P = 0.0029, and 0.0158, respectively). Patient care and combined hospital costs were both increased in the nonalvimopan group; however, combined hospital costs was not significant ( P = 0.0216 and P = 0.0875, respectively). The 30-day readmission rate of 6.3 per cent was also not significant in this group ( P = 0.0941). Patients undergoing minimally invasive colorectal surgery treated with a multimodal FT pathway tolerated a soft diet sooner, had earlier return of bowel function, a shorter length of stay, and lower patient care and combined costs when alvimopan was used.


2021 ◽  
Vol 34 (03) ◽  
pp. 186-193
Author(s):  
Assad Zahid ◽  
Danilo Miskovic

AbstractTeaching an established surgeon in a novel technique by a colleague who has acquired a level of expertise is often referred to as “proctoring” or “precepting.” Surgical preceptorships can be defined as supervised teaching programs, whereby individual or groups of surgeons (proctors) experienced in a certain technique support a colleague who wants to adopt this technique (sometimes referred to as “delegates” or “preceptees”). Preceptorship programs really focus on a specific technique, technology, or skill which is required to broaden, complement, or transform an established surgeon's practice.Within colorectal surgery, in the past 30 years, there is been an evolution of interventional options including open, laparoscopic, robotic, and endoscopic procedures. With each new emerging technology and technique, safe and effective uptake by established surgeons is best been attained by a period of proctorship by an experienced colleague. Formalizing this has been facilitated largely through industry support. There, however, remains a considerable chasm when it comes to standardization, quality control, and jurisprudence.This article aims to describe the requirements for a contemporary proctorship program, to examine instruments of quality control, and how to improve effectiveness.


2018 ◽  
Vol 33 (3) ◽  
pp. 966-971 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rosa M. Jimenez-Rodriguez ◽  
Felipe Quezada-Diaz ◽  
Madeline Tchack ◽  
Emmanouil Pappou ◽  
Iris H. Wei ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 24 (10) ◽  
pp. 2286-2294 ◽  
Author(s):  
Angela Mujukian ◽  
Adam Truong ◽  
Hai Tran ◽  
Rita Shane ◽  
Phillip Fleshner ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 34 (7) ◽  
pp. 3262-3269
Author(s):  
M. Inama ◽  
G. Spolverato ◽  
H. Impellizzeri ◽  
M. Bacchion ◽  
M. Creciun ◽  
...  

2017 ◽  
Vol 27 (4) ◽  
pp. 342-347 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alessandra Marano ◽  
Maria Carmela Giuffrida ◽  
Giorgio Giraudo ◽  
Luca Pellegrino ◽  
Felice Borghi

2016 ◽  
Vol 29 (03) ◽  
pp. 221-231 ◽  
Author(s):  
Matthew Whealon ◽  
Alessio Vinci ◽  
Alessio Pigazzi

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document