scholarly journals P086 A NOVEL CALIBRATION ALGORITHM FOR COMPARISON ACROSS PATIENT REPORTED OUTCOMES (PROS) IN VENTRAL HERNIA

2021 ◽  
Vol 108 (Supplement_8) ◽  
Author(s):  
Viren Patel ◽  
Jesse Y. Hsu ◽  
Robyn Broach ◽  
Adrienne Christopher ◽  
Martin Morris ◽  
...  

Abstract Aim While there are many patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) used for ventral hernia (VH), disease-specific instruments, like the Hernia-related Quality-of-Life (QoL) Survey (HerQLes) and Abdominal Hernia-Q (AHQ), have greater accuracy in capturing broad VH-related QoL. We present a novel calibration that allows providers to convert scores between the AHQ and HerQLes, enabling unification of QoL data. Material and Methods VH patients were prospectively identified and simultaneously administered the AHQ and HerQLes pre-and post-operatively. To ensure validity of the calibration, responses were excluded if patients answered instruments on different dates or if responses were discordant on corresponding questions on each instrument. The calibration was estimated using a linear mixed-effects model, including linear and quadratic scores, timing of survey relative to surgery and their interactions as fixed effects, and patients as random effects to account for multiple surveys from the same patient. Results In total, 109 patients were included, responding to 300 pairs of surveys (112 pre-operative and 188 post-operative). Seventeen (5.6%) were statistically excluded due to discordant responses. Conversion of the HerQLes to AHQ was most accurate when including whether the survey was completed pre-or post-operatively, with a mean square error (MSE) of 0.0091. Similarly, converting the AHQ to HerQLes was most accurate when factoring in the timing of survey administration, with a MSE of 0.016. Conclusions We present a novel and accurate method to convert scores between the AHQ and HerQLes. Portability of PROMs will be crucial in efforts to more broadly integrate PROMs into routine care in VH.

2021 ◽  
Vol 8 ◽  
pp. 237437352198925
Author(s):  
Amanda Robinson ◽  
Edith Pituskin ◽  
Colleen M Norris

A descriptive review was conducted to evaluate the evidence of cognitive patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) following cardiac surgery. The search of electronic databases resulted in 400 unique manuscripts. Nine studies met the criteria to be part of the final review. Results of the review suggest that there are few validated PROMs that assess cognitive function in the cardiac surgical population. Furthermore, PROMs have not been used to assess overall cognitive function following cardiac surgery within the past decade. However, one domain of cognitive function—memory—was described, with up to half of patients reporting a decline postoperatively. Perceived changes in cognitive function may impact health-related quality of life and a patient’s overall view of the success of their surgery. Early identification of cognitive changes measured with PROMs may encourage earlier intervention and improve patient-centered care. In clinical practice, nurses may be in the best position to administer PROMs preoperatively and postoperatively.


2021 ◽  
Vol 264 ◽  
pp. 394-401
Author(s):  
Mary Kate Luddy ◽  
Rachel Vetter ◽  
Jessica Shank ◽  
Whitney Goldner ◽  
Anery Patel ◽  
...  

BMJ Open ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 9 (2) ◽  
pp. e027046 ◽  
Author(s):  
Natasha Anne Roberts ◽  
Alison Mudge ◽  
Kim Alexander ◽  
David Wyld ◽  
Monika Janda

IntroductionPatient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) are data capture tools that collect information directly from patients. Several large research studies provide evidence that the use of PROMs in routine care provides benefits to mortality and morbidity outcomes in medical oncology patients. Despite this, implementation of PROMs in daily clinical routine is slow and challenging.Methods and analysisThis study will use a stepped-wedge design to assess the implementation of a PROM intervention in highly frequented medical oncology outpatient clinics. During a lead-in period of 4 weeks, control data will be collected. The intervention will then be implemented for 4 weeks in Clinic 1 initially, then in Clinic 2 for another 4 weeks. 500 patient encounters will be measured over the 12 weeks in total. The process of implementation will be informed and evaluated using the Medical Research Council Guidelines for Implementing Complex Interventions. The study will be guided by the Promoting Action Research in Health Services framework approach for implementation. The intervention and implementation outcomes will be measured using qualitative and quantitative data.Ethics and disseminationEthical approval has been obtained, approval number HREC/16/QRBW/100 by the Royal Brisbane and Women’s Hospital Human Research Ethics Committee. Results will be disseminated in peer-reviewed journals and at scientific meetings.Trial registrationACTRN12618000398202. Trial Status: Opened on 25 March 2018 and will continue until 12 months after the last PROMs reporting encounter.


Author(s):  
Agneta A Pagels ◽  
Maria Stendahl ◽  
Marie Evans

AbstractBackgroundAlthough patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) are gaining increased interest in developing health care quality and are a useful tool in person-centered care, their use in routine care is still limited. The aim of this study is to describe the implementation and initial results of PROMs via the Swedish Renal Registry (SRR) on a national level.MethodsAfter testing and piloting the electronic PROM application, nationwide measures were carried out in 2017 for completing the RAND-36 questionnaire online or by paper in a wide range of chronic kidney disease (CKD) patients (Stages 3–5, dialysis and transplantation) through the SRR. Cross-sectional results during the first year were analyzed by descriptive statistics and stratified by treatment modality.ResultsA total of 1378 patients from 26 of 68 renal units (39%) completed the questionnaire. The response rate for all participating hemodialysis units was 38.9%. The CKD patients had an impaired health profile compared with a Swedish general population, especially regarding physical functions and assessed general health (GH). Transplanted patients had the highest scores, whereas patients on dialysis treatment had the lowest scores. The youngest age group assessed their physical function higher and experienced fewer physical limitations and less bodily pain than the other age groups but assessed their GH and vitality (VT) relatively low. The oldest age group demonstrated the lowest health profile but rated their mental health higher than the other age groups. The older the patient, the smaller the difference compared with persons of the same age in the general population.ConclusionsNationwide, routine collection of PROMs is feasible in Sweden. However, greater emphasis is needed on motivating clinical staff to embrace the tool and its possibilities in executing person-centered care. CKD patients demonstrate impaired health-related quality of life, especially regarding limitations related to physical problems, GH and VT/energy/fatigue.


2020 ◽  
pp. 089686082095996
Author(s):  
Fredric O Finkelstein ◽  
Monica Cimini ◽  
Susan H Finkelstein ◽  
Alan S Kliger

This study was designed as a pilot study to see whether electronic patient-reported outcome measures using computer adaptive technology (CAT) could be successfully implemented in clinics caring for chronic kidney disease (CKD) and peritoneal dialysis (PD) patients. The results demonstrate the feasibility of using CAT on an iPad to assess the symptom burden and health-related quality of life of both PD and CKD patients.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document