SIMPLE AND CHOICE REACTION TIME AND THE USE OF ADVANCE INFORMATION FOR MOTOR PREPARATION IN PARKINSON'S DISEASE

Brain ◽  
1992 ◽  
Vol 115 (2) ◽  
pp. 539-564 ◽  
Author(s):  
MARJAN JAHANSHAHI ◽  
RICHARD G. BROWN ◽  
DAVID MARSDEN
Motor Control ◽  
1998 ◽  
Vol 2 (2) ◽  
pp. 125-132 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mark A. Rogers ◽  
James G. Phillips ◽  
John L. Bradshaw ◽  
Robert lansek ◽  
Dean Jones

The basal ganglia (BG) may play a part in motor sequencing. Individuals with Parkinson's disease (PD) may exhibit progressive slowing (sequence effect) during motor sequences such as writing (micrographia) and gait. In the present study, a serial two-way choice reaction time task was employed, in which advance information about each next movement was not provided until the participant began moving, thereby assessing the participant's ability to utilize advance information. Participants were 13 individuals with idiopathic PD and 13 age-matched controls. Both PD subjects and controls showed a significant sequence effect in the absence of advance information, possibly reflecting difficulty in initiating and maintaining movement without external cues. PD subjects and controls both exhibited a sequence effect at moderate levels of advance information. At high levels of advance information, PD subjects showed the effect but controls did not, suggesting that controls, unlike PD subjects, were able to use the extra information to facilitate performance, perhaps reflecting more frontal aspects of impairment in PD.


Author(s):  
Kanch Sharma ◽  
Sean James Fallon ◽  
Thomas Davis ◽  
Scott Ankrett ◽  
Greg Munro ◽  
...  

Abstract Introduction Caffeine is frequently consumed to boost goal-directed attention. These procognitive effects may occur due to the adenosine-mediated enhancement of monoamines, such as dopamine, after caffeine administration. As such, caffeine’s beneficial effects may be altered in conditions such as Parkinson’s disease (PD). However, whether caffeine improves cognition, and at what cost, has not been experimentally established in patients with neurodegenerative disease. Methods Single-dose trials to probe cognitive effects of caffeine are often confounded by short-term caffeine abstinence which conflates caffeine’s effects with treatment of withdrawal. Using a placebo controlled, blinded, randomised trial design, we assessed the effect of 100 mg of caffeine across well-established tasks (Choice reaction time, Stroop Task and Rapid Serial Visual Presentation Task; RSVP) that probe different aspects of attention in PD patients (n = 24) and controls (n = 44). Critically, participants withdrew from caffeine for a week prior to testing to eliminate the possibility that withdrawal reversal explained any cognitive benefit. Results Caffeine administration was found to reduce the overall number of errors in patients and controls on the Stroop (p = .018, η2p = .086) and Choice reaction time (p < . 0001, η2p = .588) tasks, but there was no specific effect of caffeine on ignoring irrelevant information in the Stroop task. On the RSVP task, caffeine improved dual item accuracy (p = .037) but impaired single item accuracy (p = .044). Across all tasks, there was little evidence that caffeine has different effects in PD participants and controls. Conclusion When removing withdrawal effects as a factor, we demonstrate caffeine has beneficial effects on selective attention but is a double-edge sword for visual temporal attention and would need careful targeting to be clinically useful.


1999 ◽  
Vol 815 (2) ◽  
pp. 367-372 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yasar Kutukcu ◽  
William J Marks ◽  
Douglas S Goodin ◽  
Michael J Aminoff

Neurology ◽  
1988 ◽  
Vol 38 (2) ◽  
pp. 249-249 ◽  
Author(s):  
S. L. Pullman ◽  
R. L. Watts ◽  
J. L. Juncos ◽  
T. N. Chase ◽  
J. N. Sanes

2007 ◽  
Vol 34 (S 2) ◽  
Author(s):  
TD Hälbig ◽  
S Assuras ◽  
J Barry ◽  
JC Borod ◽  
JM Gracies ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document