scholarly journals Response Execution in Lexical Decision Tasks Obscures Sex-specific Lateralization Effects in Language Processing: Evidence from Event-related Potential Measures during Word Reading

2005 ◽  
Vol 16 (7) ◽  
pp. 978-989 ◽  
Author(s):  
Holger Hill ◽  
Friederike Ott ◽  
Cornelia Herbert ◽  
Matthias Weisbrod
2021 ◽  
Vol 6 ◽  
Author(s):  
Eric Pelzl ◽  
Ellen F. Lau ◽  
Taomei Guo ◽  
Robert M. DeKeyser

People who grow up speaking a language without lexical tones typically find it difficult to master tonal languages after childhood. Accumulating research suggests that much of the challenge for these second language (L2) speakers has to do not with identification of the tones themselves, but with the bindings between tones and lexical units. The question that remains open is how much of these lexical binding problems are problems of encoding (incomplete knowledge of the tone-to-word relations) vs. retrieval (failure to access those relations in online processing). While recent work using lexical decision tasks suggests that both may play a role, one issue is that failure on a lexical decision task may reflect a lack of learner confidence about what is not a word, rather than non-native representation or processing of known words. Here we provide complementary evidence using a picture-phonology matching paradigm in Mandarin in which participants decide whether or not a spoken target matches a specific image, with concurrent event-related potential (ERP) recording to provide potential insight into differences in L1 and L2 tone processing strategies. As in the lexical decision case, we find that advanced L2 learners show a clear disadvantage in accurately identifying tone mismatched targets relative to vowel mismatched targets. We explore the contribution of incomplete/uncertain lexical knowledge to this performance disadvantage by examining individual data from an explicit tone knowledge post-test. Results suggest that explicit tone word knowledge and confidence explains some but not all of the errors in picture-phonology matching. Analysis of ERPs from correct trials shows some differences in the strength of L1 and L2 responses, but does not provide clear evidence toward differences in processing that could explain the L2 disadvantage for tones. In sum, these results converge with previous evidence from lexical decision tasks in showing that advanced L2 listeners continue to have difficulties with lexical tone recognition, and in suggesting that these difficulties reflect problems both in encoding lexical tone knowledge and in retrieving that knowledge in real time.


2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Eva Denise Poort ◽  
Jennifer M Rodd

Cognates are words which share their form and meaning in multiple languages, like “winter” in Dutch and English. A wealth of research on bilingual language processing suggests that bilinguals process cognates more quickly than words that exist in only one language. Researchers take this finding as evidence that all the words a bilingual knows are stored in a single mental lexicon. Much of this research has made use of lexical decision tasks, but such tasks are quite artificial. In recent experiments we found that the presence or absence of this cognate facilitation effect depends on the other stimuli included in the task. In this blog I argue, on the basis of this finding, that evidence for a cognate facilitation effect in lexical decision tasks alone should not be taken as proof for this central assumption in bilingualism research.Blog post originally posted on http://understandingwords.com/2017/10/30/what-can-lexical-decision-tasks-tell-us-about-bilingual-language-processing/.


2013 ◽  
Vol 39 (2) ◽  
pp. 529-551 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yasushi Hino ◽  
Yuu Kusunose ◽  
Stephen J. Lupker ◽  
Debra Jared

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document