Microelimination or not? The changing epidemiology of HIV-HCV coinfection in France 2012-2018

Author(s):  
Laurent Cotte ◽  
Laurent Hocqueloux ◽  
Maeva Lefebvre ◽  
Pierre Pradat ◽  
Firouze Bani-Sadr ◽  
...  

Abstract Background The arrival of highly effective, well tolerated direct-acting antiviral agents (DAA) led to a dramatic decrease in HCV prevalence. HIV-HCV coinfected patients are deemed a priority population for HCV elimination, while a rise of recently acquired HCV infections in MSM has been described. We describe the variations in HIV-HCV epidemiology in the French Dat’AIDS cohort. Methods Retrospective analysis of a prospective HIV-infected cohort from 2012 to 2018. Determination of HCV prevalence, incidence, proportion of viremic patients, treatment uptake and mortality rate in the full cohort and by HIV risk factors. Results From 2012 to 2018, 50861 HIV-infected patients with a known HCV status were followed-up. During the period, HCV prevalence decreased from 15.4% to 13.5%. HCV prevalence among new HIV cases increased from 1.9% to 3.5% in MSM but remained stable in other groups. Recently acquired HCV incidence increased from 0.36/100PY to 1.25/100PY in MSM. The proportion of viremic patients decreased from 67.0% to 8.9%. MSM became the first group of viremic patients in 2018 (37.9%). Recently acquired hepatitis represented 59.2% of viremic MSM in 2018. DAA treatment uptake increased from 11.4% to 61.5%. More treatments were initiated in MSM in 2018 (41.2%) than in IVDU (35.6%). In MSM, treatment at acute phase represented 30.0% of treatments in 2018. Conclusions A major shift in HCV epidemiology was observed in HIV-infected patients in France from 2012 to 2018, leading to a unique situation in which the major group of HCV transmission in 2018 was MSM.

2015 ◽  
Vol 3 (3) ◽  
pp. 93-105 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bassam Bernieh

AbstractHepatitis outbreaks in hemodialysis (HD) patients and staff were reported in the late 1960s, and a number of hepatotropic viruses transmitted by blood and other body fluids have been identified. Hepatitis B virus (HBV) was the first significant hepatotropic virus to be identified in HD centers. HBV infection has been effectively controlled by active vaccination, screening of blood donors, the use of erythropoietin and segregation of HBV carriers. Hepatitis delta virus is a defective virus that can only infect HBV-positive individuals. Hepatitis C virus (HCV) is the most significant cause of non-A, non-B hepatitis and is mainly transmitted by blood transfusion. The introduction in 1990 of routine screening of blood donors for HCV contributed significantly to the control of HCV transmission. An effective HCV vaccine remains an unsolved challenge; however, pegylation of interferon-alfa has made it possible to treat HCV-positive dialysis patients. Unexplained sporadic outbreaks of hepatitis by the mid-1990s prompted the discovery of hepatitis G virus, hepatitis GB virus C and the TT virus. The vigilant observation of guidelines on universal precaution and regular virologic testing are the cornerstones of the effective control of chronic hepatitis in the setting of HD. Major recent advances in the viral diagnosis technology and the development of new oral, direct-acting antiviral agents allow early diagnosis and better therapeutic response. The current update will review the recent developments, controversies and new treatment of viral hepatitis in HD patients.


2020 ◽  
Vol 43 (8) ◽  
pp. 418-425
Author(s):  
Maria Isabel Guzman Ramos ◽  
Mercedes Manzano-García ◽  
M. de las Aguas Robustillo-Cortés ◽  
Juan Antonio Pineda ◽  
Ramón Morillo-Verdugo

Viruses ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 13 (3) ◽  
pp. 432
Author(s):  
Lorenzo Onorato ◽  
Mariantonietta Pisaturo ◽  
Mario Starace ◽  
Carmine Minichini ◽  
Alessandra Di Fraia ◽  
...  

The availability of all oral direct acting antiviral agents (DAAs) has revolutionized the management of HCV infections in recent years, allowing to achieve a sustained virological response (SVR) in more than 95% of cases, irrespective of hepatitis C Virus (HCV) genotype or staging of liver disease. Although rare, the failure to the latest-generation regimens (grazoprevir/elbasvir, sofosbuvir/velpatasvir, pibrentasvir/glecaprevir) represents a serious clinical problem, since the data available in the literature on the virological characteristics and management of these patients are few. The aim of the present narrative review was to provide an overview of the impact of baseline RASs in patients treated with the latest-generation DAAs and to analyze the efficacy of the available retreatment strategies in those who have failed these regimens.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document