Assessment of renal function by serum creatinine and creatinine clearance: glomerular filtration rate estimated by four procedures.

1989 ◽  
Vol 35 (12) ◽  
pp. 2326-2330 ◽  
Author(s):  
F Van Lente ◽  
P Suit

Abstract We compared creatinine concentrations in serum and urine and creatinine clearances determined by two Jaffé (Beckman's "Astra," Boehringer Mannheim Diagnostics) and two enzymatic (Kodak, Boehringer Mannheim Diagnostics) methods. Serum creatinine and creatinine clearances determined by each method were also compared with the glomerular filtration rate as measured with use of sodium [125I]iothalamate in patients with a wide range of renal function. Results between methods correlated excellently, but we saw clear method-dependent biases of up to 2.9 mg/L for serum. The highest serum creatinine values and the lowest creatinine clearances were obtained with Boehringer Mannheim Diagnostics' Jaffé method. The reciprocal of the serum creatinine and the creatinine clearance also correlated well with the glomerular filtration rate, but all methods over-estimated the glomerular filtration rates to varying degrees. Appropriate standardization of methods appears to be as important as method principle for establishing an accurate relationship between creatinine determinations and glomerular filtration rate.

Folia Medica ◽  
2012 ◽  
Vol 54 (4) ◽  
pp. 5-13 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bilyana H. Teneva

Abstract In liver cirrhosis patients awaiting liver transplantation, it is prognostically equally important to assess the renal function before and after transplantation. This is evidenced by the inclusion of serum creatinine in the Model for End-Stage Liver Disease (MELD) score. Most of the causes of renal failure in liver cirrhosis are functional, the acute kidney damage including prerenal azotemia, acute tubular necrosis and hepatorenal syndrome. A major index of the renal function, the glomerular filtration rate (GFR) is determined in a specific way in patients with liver cirrhosis. Clinically, serum creatinine is considered the best indicator of kidney function, although it is rather unreliable when it comes to early assessment of renal dysfunction. Most of the patients with liver cirrhosis have several concomitant conditions, which are the reason for the false low creatinine levels, even in the presence of moderate to severe kidney damage. This also holds for the creatinine clearance and creatinine-based estimation equations for assessment of the glomerular filtration rate (the Cockroft-Gault and MDRD formulas), which overestimate the real glomerular filtration. Clearance of exogenous markers is considered a gold standard, but the methods for their determination are rather costly and hard to apply. Alternative serum markers (e.g., cystatin C) have been used, but they should be better studied in cases of liver cirrhosis assessment.


2012 ◽  
Vol 130 (5) ◽  
pp. 289-293 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alexandre Libório ◽  
Russian Uchoa ◽  
João Neto ◽  
Juan Valdivia ◽  
Elizabeth De Francesco Daher ◽  
...  

CONTEXT AND OBJECTIVE: Severe heart failure is highly associated with chronic kidney disease (CKD). Serum creatinine is a poor indicator of renal function and glomerular filtration rate (GFR) estimation is an accessible method for assessing renal function. The most popular formulas for GFR estimation are the Cockcroft-Gault (CG), the four-variable Simplified Modification of Diet in Renal Disease (sMDRD) and the recently introduced CKD-Epidemiology Collaboration (CKD-EPI). The objective of the study was to analyze the correlation between these three equations for estimating GFR in patients with severe heart failure. DESIGN AND SETTING: Cross-sectional observational study at a university reference center. METHODS: GFR was estimated in patients with severe heart failure who were awaiting heart transplantation, using the CG, sMDRD and CKD-EPI formulas. These estimates were analyzed using Pearson's correlation and Bland-Altman analysis. RESULTS: This study included 157 patients, of whom 32 (20.3%) were female. Normal serum creatinine concentration was observed in 21.6%. The mean GFR according to CG, sMDRD and CKD-EPI was 70.1 ± 29.5, 70.7 ± 37.5 and 73.7 ± 30.1 ml/min/1.73 m²; P > 0.05. Pearson's coefficient demonstrated good correlations between all the formulas, as did Bland-Altman. However, the patients presented GFR < 60 ml/min more frequently with the sMDRD formula (54.1% versus 40.2% for CG and 43.2% for CKD-EPI; P = 0.02). CONCLUSION: Despite the good correlation and agreement between the three methods, the sMDRD formula classified more patients as presenting GFR less than 60 ml/min.


2020 ◽  
Vol 35 (Supplement_3) ◽  
Author(s):  
Lengnan Xu ◽  
Yonghui Mao ◽  
Aiqun Chen ◽  
Ban Zhao

Abstract Background and Aims The kidney is an important organ that removes metabolites and certain wastes and poisons from the body, and retains water and other useful substances through reabsorption. Its aging and function decline have a significant impact on the human health.Rather than simply depending on serum creatinine, glomerular filtration rate (GFR) assessment equation should be given priority in evaluating renal function. Different evaluated GFR (eGFR) equations sometimes have great differences in assessing the true value of GFR, especially for the elderly. The purpose of this study was to analyze the aging changes of renal function in normal people in Beijing and to compare the significance of different eGFR equations in evaluating renal function in Chinese population. Method The age, sex and serum creatinine were recorded in the population who underwent routine physical examination in our hospital from January 2012 to December 2014. Kidney function was assessed by CKD-EPI, MDRD, MDRDc, FAS and BIS equations, respectively. Results A total of 46 713 persons were enrolled in this study, of whom 27 249 (58.33%) were males. They were followed up for 3 years, ranging in age from 16 to 100 years. Both men and women showed age-related change in serum creatinine: serum creatinine and its standard deviation gradually increases parallel with age, indicating that the range of serum creatinine changes in the elderly was larger. Whether male or female, there were differences in eGFR change between different age groups (male: Χ2=141.28, P=0.000; female: Χ2=97.55, P=0.000). For male, eGFR decreased more in the elderly, and it was more common for young people to keep the eGFR constant or increase. However, in female, eGFR remained unchanged in most old people, and increased or decreased in the majority of the young. For all age groups, the ICC was very consistent among the equations, 0.849 for males and 0.817 for females. The whole population was divided into three groups according to serum creatinine &lt; 1mg/dL, &gt; 1mg/dL and &lt; 1.5mg/dL, &gt; 1.5mg/dL. The CKD-EPI equation gave higher stages of CKD than other equations. There was no clear age-related change trend in the 3-year average eGFR change rate of all age groups. For the elderly over 70 years of age, the MDRD and MDRDc equations had higher GFR evaluation results than the other three equations. The BIS equation had the lowest results of all equations. The ICC was very consistent among the equations, 0.966 for males and 0.957 for females. Conclusion we believed that the annual change of GFR varied from person to person and had little to do with age. GFR needed to be calculated more accurately in order to formulate corresponding medical strategies. Those eGFR equations the above-mentioned can be used to evaluate renal function, but the results were very different for different populations and serum creatinine levels. The use of different eGFR equations may lead to large differences in drug dose adjustment and the risk of serious adverse reactions. For the elderly in China, which equation was more suitable was inconclusive and further research was urgently needed.


1989 ◽  
Vol 35 (2) ◽  
pp. 312-314 ◽  
Author(s):  
F S Apple ◽  
P Benson ◽  
P A Abraham ◽  
T G Rosano ◽  
C E Halstenson

Abstract We compared creatinine clearances determined by enzymatic (Kodak Ektachem 700 single-slide, Boehringer Mannheim creatinine PAP) and nonenzymatic (Jaffé, HPLC) methods with glomerular filtration rate measured by inulin clearance in patients with varying degrees of renal function. The Kodak enzymatic assay gave values for creatinine 2 to 3 mg/L higher than the other methods. This resulted in significantly lower creatinine clearances than inulin clearances and creatinine clearances determined by the other methods. However, correlations between all methods for serum and urinary creatinine values and clearances were good. To avoid between assay (enzymatic vs nonenzymatic) discrepancies, manufacturers should agree to an acceptable standard of calibration under the usual conditions used with patients.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document