Performance of Proficiency Survey Samples in Two Immunoradiometric Assays of Human Growth Hormone and Comparison with Patients' Samples

1992 ◽  
Vol 38 (4) ◽  
pp. 553-557 ◽  
Author(s):  
P J Pringle ◽  
J Jones ◽  
P C Hindmarsh ◽  
M A Preece ◽  
C G Brook

Abstract The immunoradiometric assay (IRMA) used in our laboratory for the measurement of growth hormone (hGH; somatotropin) performed badly in the national proficiency survey program, the U.K. External Quality Assessment Scheme (EQAS). We compared our assay with another IRMA, which gave similar results for patients' samples and performed adequately in EQAS. The samples from EQAS are collected from patients with polycythemia and fall into two categories: those containing endogenous hGH and those supplemented with pituitary-derived hGH. Analysis of the two groups separately showed that the differences between the two IRMAS were in the measurement of the endogenous hormone. The reason for this appears to be a matrix effect related to the fact that the EQAS serum samples are collected from polycythemic patients.

1993 ◽  
Vol 39 (8) ◽  
pp. 1620-1625 ◽  
Author(s):  
K Albertsson-Wikland ◽  
C Jansson ◽  
S Rosberg ◽  
A Novamo

Abstract We describe a time-resolved immunofluorometric assay (trIFMA) for human growth hormone (hGH), in which monoclonal antibody (mAb)-coated microtiter strip wells and a europium (Eu) chelate-labeled mAb are used. We compare the new trIFMA, in which two mAbs are used, with an immunoradiometric assay (IRMA) in which polyclonal antibodies are used. Serum samples (n = 185) from 36 children with various diagnoses were analyzed. In addition, 24-h profile samples (72 per child) from 39 children were analyzed. The trIFMA was more sensitive (detection limit, 0.03 mIU/L) than existing IRMAs. Both the intra- and interassay CVs were < or = 10.6% for hGH concentrations between 1 and 100 mIU/L. The trIFMA is technically simple and rapid, requires no centrifugation or separation reagent, and has a counting time of only 1 s per sample. In addition, the Eu label is nontoxic, presents no waste-disposal problems, and has a long shelf-life. Finally, the assay requires only small volumes of serum (25 muL), which is of considerable importance in pediatric use. The mAbs used for the trIFMA selectively bind the 22-kDa form of hGH, with the result that the assay detects about 80% of the amount detected by the polyclonal IRMA.


2018 ◽  
Vol 56 (11) ◽  
pp. 1921-1925 ◽  
Author(s):  
Diego Franciotta ◽  
Matteo Gastaldi ◽  
Tiziana Biagioli ◽  
Luana Benedetti ◽  
Claudia Giannotta ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Anti-ganglioside antibodies are currently used in the differential diagnosis of suspected immune-mediated neuropathies. In-house and increasingly used commercial assays seem to perform suboptimally, and comparative information on their analytical performance are essentially lacking. Born within the frame of guidelines and standardization activities by the Italian Association of Neuroimmunology, this external quality assessment scheme (EQAS) is a real-life snapshot of the laboratory diagnostics in this field. Methods The EQAS consisted of five surplus, anonymized serum samples from patients with clinically-defined neuropathies and two serum samples from healthy blood donors. Eight laboratories used commercial line-/dot-blots, seven in-house/commercial ELISAs (in addition, 13 laboratories tested a recently released ELISA by Bühlmann). Only high anti-ganglioside antibody reactivities were considered, in accordance with consolidated recommendations. Results Large variations in anti-ganglioside antibody profiles were observed, even, although to a lesser extent, within homogeneous classes of assays. Concordance between the profiles and clinical phenotypes was also partial. Conclusions Although conducted on a relatively small, but representative number of Italian laboratories, this EQAS shows a critical between-laboratory disagreement in the test results of anti-ganglioside antibodies. Also considering the trend for using certified assays in generalist laboratories, strong efforts toward standardization and the identification of the best method(s) for their determinations are compellingly needed.


1992 ◽  
Vol 38 (10) ◽  
pp. 2107-2110 ◽  
Author(s):  
G Banfi ◽  
M Marinelli ◽  
M Pontillo ◽  
P Bonini

Abstract Discrepancies among different methods for assaying human growth hormone have been described in various studies. The two major sources of discordant results are the heterogeneity of the antibodies and the different standardization bases used by the assay manufacturers. We propose standardizing assays with 22-kDa biosynthetic monomer human growth hormone diluted with the diluents supplied by the kit manufacturers. In a study of two monoclonal immunoradiometric assays (Hybritech, specific for the 22-kDa monomer; Sorin, recognizing also a 20-kDa variant hormone), standardization with 22-kDa monomer human growth hormone reduced by 63% the differences in results for 44 serum samples from children. The use of 22-kDa human growth hormone as a common standard, highly pure and easily available in large quantities, could help limit the interpretative problems in growth diagnostics.


Blood ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 134 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. 5793-5793
Author(s):  
Vinod Devalia ◽  
Finlay Mackenzie

Background Although serum B12 assay is the most commonly used routine test for assessing cobalamin status in the body, it has its limitations (Mackenzie F and Devalia V (2018) Laboratory performance of serum B12 assay in the United Kingdom (UK) as assessed by the UK National External Quality Assessment Scheme for haematinics: implications for clinical interpretation. BLOOD, 132, suppl 1, 2230). Holotranscobalamin assay(HoloTC), also known as 'Active B12' assay, is an alternative test which is increasingly used as a first line test since it is felt to represent the assessment of the functional component of the cobalamin status of the body, and possibly a more relevant assessment clinically. However, its technical performance in terms of reliability and suitability in a routine diagnostic laboratory for clinical assessment has not been published. In the United Kingdom, there are over 30 laboratories performing the assay using five different platforms. The numerical value obtained of any sample can vary considerably between the different methodologies used.. External quality assessment of the assays is organised by UK NEQAS for Haematinics by sending three serum samples every 3 months. An 'all participants' consensus mean is calculated and used as the target value and the results analysed with respect to intra-group variation. The percentage bias from the target value is used to assess performance. Aim We present data on one such assessment to demonstrate the performance of the serum holotranscobalamin assay (Survey number 248, April 2018) and also how it is interpreted by the laboratory for clinical use. Method Three serum samples with a HoloTC target value of approximately 7.98 (low/indeterminate), 35.7 (normal/indeterminate) and 53.2 (normal) pmol/L were sent to participating laboratories for analysis (labelled as 248A, B and C respectively: see figure 1). Laboratories were also asked for an interpretation of their result which would be reported to the requesting clinician, namely from low to high (see figure 2). Results Fig 1 shows an individual laboratory's result in relation to all laboratories using the same technology (shaded histogram) or all methods (open histogram). There is a significant variation with an overall co-efficient of variation of around 10% within all the three different samples. Fig 2 shows the distribution of results in the different methodologies used and how each laboratory interpreted its result. It demonstrates the bias of results obtained by the different methods.The vast majority use the Abbot Architect (AB13) platform, and there is a suggestion of a trend of the results obtained to lie on the lower side than the other platforms used. For sample 248A, all laboratories reported it as 'low' or deficient. For sample 248B, there is a significant variation is reporting the sample as 'low', 'normal' or 'indeterminate' within the same platform used, clearly seen in the Abbot Architecture group. Indeed, the interpretation provided by the laboratory varies even with the same numerical value of the result. Discussion These data demonstrate that serum HoloTC assay has an overall co-efficient of variation around 10%. The numerical value obtained of any sample can vary considerably according to the technology used, and the clinical interpretation provided by the laboratory can be variable and not entirely concordant with the numerical result of the assay used. This is particularly evident around the 30-40 pmol/L range. This may be partly explained by the fact that it is not quite clear what would be regarded as the normal or reference range, which has been previously taken as 40 - 200 pmol/L (according to previous publications). Conclusion The UK NEQAS Haematinics Programme is unique in providing external quality assessment for laboratories using HoloTC assays for determining body cobalamin status in a style that is also unique across EQA/ PT schemes. Laboratories need to assess their performance in analysis of serum HoloTC levels in order to provide appropriate clinical advice. Ideally clinicians should be aware of the limitations of the HoloTC assay as demonstrated in this external quality assessment scheme exercise. Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document