Impact of Aphthous Colitis at Diagnosis on Crohn’s Disease Outcomes

2019 ◽  
Vol 14 (3) ◽  
pp. 342-350
Author(s):  
Charlotte Delattre ◽  
Ayanna Lewis ◽  
Julien Kirchgesner ◽  
Isabelle Nion-Larmurier ◽  
Anne Bourrier ◽  
...  

Abstract Background The natural history of intestinal lesions in Crohn’s disease [CD] is not fully understood. Although the extent of lesions at diagnosis usually defines the extent of the disease, some lesions seen at diagnosis, particularly aphthous ulcers [AUs], may resolve before follow-up. The aim of this study was to evaluate the outcomes of CD patients with colonic AUs seen at diagnosis. Methods CD patients with aphthous colitis at diagnosis who had been followed since 2001 were included in a case control study matched with two groups of controls: one without colonic involvement at diagnosis and a second group with colonic lesions more severe than AUs at diagnosis. Results Seventy-five patients were included, with a median follow-up of 7.3 years [interquartile range 2.7–9.8]. Seventy-one per cent of those having a second colonoscopy at least 6 months after diagnosis were stable or healed. Medical treatments were similar between the three groups. The AU group’s rate of ileal surgery was similar to those without colitis. In multivariate analysis, the independent factors associated with ileal resection were ileal involvement (odds ratio [OR]: 8.8; 95% confidence interval [CI] [7.68–33.75]; p = 0.002) and the presence of severe colitis (OR = 0.5; 95% CI [0.32–0.79], p = 0.003). The risk of ileal surgery was not influenced by the presence of aphthous colitis (OR: 0.63; 95% CI [0.37–1.1]; p = 0.1). Conclusion Aphthous colitis at diagnosis seems to resolve in most patients. This suggests that these lesions are of little clinical significance and may not need to be considered prior to ileal resection in CD or when making other important therapeutic decisions.

2016 ◽  
Vol 150 (4) ◽  
pp. S781-S782
Author(s):  
Rabilloud Marie-Laure ◽  
Charlène Brochard ◽  
Emma Bajeux ◽  
Siproudhis Laurent ◽  
Jean-François Viel ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Carolina Amado ◽  
Pedro Gonçalo Ferreira

Pleuroparenchymal fibroelastosis (PPFE) is a relatively rare interstitial lung disease (ILD) consisting of elastofibrosis involving the subpleural parenchyma and visceral pleura with an upper lobe predominance. It can be idiopathic or associated with some forms of autoimmune disease. The authors describe the case of a 78-year-old woman with a previous diagnosis of Crohn’s disease (CD). She presented with a protracted respiratory infection (with no significant history of previous infections), and underwent high-resolution chest computerized tomography that eventually showed alterations compatible with PPFE. After exclusion of other possible underlying causes, a possible link to CD was considered. Follow-up investigation at 12 months showed clinical and radiological stability and also stable lung function under treatment with hydroxychloroquine and prednisolone. This is the first report of PPFE in the context of CD. Future studies will be important to further investigate this pathological association and its prognostic implications.


2020 ◽  
Vol 14 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. S118-S120 ◽  
Author(s):  
H Alric ◽  
A Amiot ◽  
J Kirchgesner ◽  
X Tréton ◽  
M Allez ◽  
...  

Abstract Background There is no head-to-head trial comparing ustekinumab and vedolizumab in patients with Crohn’s disease (CD) refractory to anti-TNF. In France between May 2014 and November 2016, vedolizumab (and not ustekinumab) was reimbursed for patients who had failed anti-TNF. Then, between December 2016 and August 2018, ustekinumab (and not vedolizumab) was reimbursed for this category of patients. Since September 2018, both ustekinumab and vedolizumab are reimbursed in patients who are refractory to anti-TNF. The aim of this study was to compare effectiveness and safety of ustekinumab and vedolizumab in patients with CD refractory to anti-TNF. Methods We studied all consecutive patients with active CD who were refractory to at least one anti-TNF, and were treated either with vedolizumab or ustekinumab, in five university hospitals of the Paris area, between May 2014 and August 2018. The primary endpoint was clinical remission rate at week 48. Adjustment according to propensity scores with inverse probability of treatment weighting was performed. Results 239 patients were included, 107 received ustekinumab and 132 received vedolizumab. After propensity scoring with IPTW, there was no difference between the two groups (Figure 1). At week 48, the clinical remission rate was higher with ustekinumab than with vedolizumab (54.4% vs. 38.3%; OR =1.92, 95% CI [1.09–3.39]). At week 48, corticosteroid-free remission rate tended to be numerically higher with ustekinumab than with vedolizumab (44.7% vs. 34.0%; OR = 1.57, 95% CI [0.88–2.79]). Treatment persistence was significantly more frequent in the ustekinumab group (71.5% vs. 49.7%; OR = 2.54, 95% CI [1.40–4.62]). The dose optimisation rate at week 48 was higher with vedolizumab than with ustekinumab (53.5% vs. 30.1%; OR = 0.37, 95% Cl [0.21–0.67]). Subgroup analyses showed that ustekinumab was associated with higher clinical remission rates at week 48 in patients with ileal CD (OR = 3.49; 95% CI [1.33–9.17]), a penetrating phenotype (OR = 6.58; 95% CI [1.91–22.68]) and a history of perianal disease (OR = 2.48; 95% CI [1.04–5.93]). Regardless of treatment group, combotherapy was associated with a higher clinical remission rate at week 48 (OR = 1.93; 95% CI [1.09–3.43]). Conclusion This study suggests that, after 1 year of follow-up, ustekinumab is associated with a higher rate of clinical remission than vedolizumab in CD patients refractory to anti-TNF, particularly in those with ileal and penetrating disease.


2020 ◽  
Vol 14 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. S264-S266
Author(s):  
R Ungaro ◽  
R Jordan ◽  
C Yzet ◽  
P Bossuyt ◽  
F Baert ◽  
...  

Abstract Background The optimal endoscopic target in early Crohn’s disease (CD) that limits long-term disease complications is unknown. Methods We analysed medical records from patients who had follow-up data since the end of CALM. Patients with Crohn’s disease endoscopic index of severity (CDEIS) scores at the end of CALM were included. The primary outcome was a composite of major adverse outcomes reflecting CD progression: new internal fistula/abscess, stricture, perianal fistula/abscess, CD hospitalisation, or CD surgery since the end of CALM. We compared median CDEIS and per cent improvement from baseline CDEIS. Youden index analysis was used to identify optimal CDEIS cut-off score associated with CD progression. Kaplan–Meier and Cox regression methods were used to compare rates of progression by different CDEIS targets. Multivariable models were adjusted for age, prior surgery, and stricturing behaviour. Results 110 patients with median age 28 (IQR 22–38) years, disease duration 0.2 (0.1–0.5) years, and median follow up of 3.1 (1.9–4.4) years were included. Eleven per cent had a history of stricture, 5.5% history of surgery, and 52% were originally in the tight control arm of the CALM study. Median CDEIS score at end of CALM was 3 (0–5.4) and 32 (29%) patients had disease progression. Baseline median CDEIS score was similar between those with and without progression [10.9 (7.5–15.5) vs. 11.9 (8–17.5)]. Median CDEIS score at the end of CALM was higher among those with progression [1.3 (0–5.1) vs. 4.9 (3–9.1), p < 0.001)]. Patients within higher quartiles of CDEIS score had higher rates of progression over time (Figure 1). Patients without disease progression had a greater median decrease in CDEIS score from baseline to end of CALM [90% (60–100%) vs. 50% (30–80%), p < 0.001]. The optimal CDEIS score cut-off was 2 with sensitivity 84%, specificity 60% and NPV 90% for progression. Patients with CDEIS ≤ 2 had less progression over time compared with patients with > 50% improvement from baseline CDEIS (not reaching CDEIS ≤ 2) and those not meeting either endpoint (Figure 2). On adjusted analysis, CDEIS score ≤ 2 was associated with a decreased risk of progression (aHR 0.23, 95% CI 0.09–0.56). Conclusion In early CD, a CDEIS score ≤ 2 is optimal cut-off associated with a lower risk of disease progression.


Author(s):  
Jonathan Segal ◽  
Alan Askari ◽  
Susan Clark ◽  
Ailsa Hart ◽  
Omar Faiz

2021 ◽  
Vol 108 (Supplement_6) ◽  
Author(s):  
B Wadham ◽  
T Connolly ◽  
R Satchidanand

Abstract Ingested foreign bodies (FBs) occur most commonly in children or adults with impaired neurological function. Overall, 80% are thought to pass spontaneously in the faeces, with around 20% requiring endoscopy and less than 1% requiring surgical intervention. ‘Missed’ gastro-intestinal FBs are rare and often due to the lack of an obtainable history in patients with communication difficulties. We present the unusual case of a 27-year-old female with severe learning difficulties and a complex surgical history who presented with a 2-year history of increasing abdominal discomfort due to a ‘missed’ FB. Four CT scans had misdiagnosed Crohn’s disease and the patient was due to commence immunosuppression when she developed a small bowel perforation. This was managed conservatively and follow-up imaging with a CT with oral contrast detected the FB in the ileum. The patient underwent a laparotomy with resection of a 26cm segment of ileum containing a plastic straw. Post-operatively she recovered uneventfully and is now symptom free with no evidence of IBD on histology. This case highlights the value of oral contrast enhancement imaging in patients who don’t fit a ‘classical’ inflammatory bowel disease presentation.


2021 ◽  
Vol 15 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. S265-S265
Author(s):  
A Hassine ◽  
I Akkari ◽  
S Mrabet ◽  
E Ben Jazia

Abstract Background The Lemann Index (LI) was developed to assess cumulative digestive tract damage in patients with Crohn’s disease (CD), independently of clinical and biological activity. Recently, therapeutic goals in CD have focused on achieving mucosal healing and deep remission rather than simple symptom control, thus requiring prevention of progression of intestinal damage. The aim of this study was to assess the influence of different treatments on the progression of structural damage, using the LI. Methods we retrospectively included all patients with CD, followed in our center during the period between January 2016 and January 2020. The LI was calculated from the first (LI1) and the last (LI2) clinical consultations. The evolution of (LI1-LI2) or Delta LI (DLI) was recorded. Results 112 patients with CD were collected, of which 53.6% were female. The mean age at diagnosis was 33.29 years [15–63]. Active smoking was found in 34 patients (30.4%). Regarding the localization of CD, it was ileal (L1 according to the Montreal classification), colonic (L2), and ileocolonic (L3) in respectively 16.1%, 42.9% and 41%. The disease phenotype was inflammatory (B1) in 60.7%, stricturing (B2) in 21.42%, and penetrating (B3) in 17.85%. The initial flare was judged to be severe in 33.9% of cases, moderate in 55.4% of cases and mild in 10.7% of cases, with a mean CDAI of 305.21 [115–493]. Regarding maintenance treatment, 51.8% of patients (n = 58) were on Azathioprine, 23.2% (n = 26) were on aminosalicylates, and 25% (n = 28) were on anti-TNF, including 42, 9% under combination therapy. The median follow-up was 36.82 ± 16.83 months, with no difference between the groups. During follow-up, the mean LI increased significantly from 3.34 [0.58–8.82] to 7.82 [0.62–32.6] in the azathioprine group (p = 0.0001), from 2.0 [0.58–6.52] to 3.91 [0.6–14.03] in the Aminosalicylates group (p = 0.001) and from 3.79 [1.05–8.42] to 10.01 [2.58–33.08] in the Anti-TNF group (p = 0.0001). The mean DLI was -4.48 for the Azathioprine group, -1.9 for the Salicylates group and -6.14 for the Anti-TNF group, with no statistically significant difference (p = 0.16). Conclusion In patients with CD, the LI tends to increase over time. In our series, the use of Anti-TNF α does not appear to be able to reduce the progression of intestinal lesions, compared to other therapies.


2020 ◽  
Vol 20 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Mingming Zhu ◽  
Qi Feng ◽  
Xitao Xu ◽  
Yuqi Qiao ◽  
Zhe Cui ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Clinicians aim to prevent progression of Crohn’s disease (CD); however, many patients require surgical resection because of cumulative bowel damage. The aim of this study was to evaluate the impact of early intervention on bowel damage in patients with CD using the Lémann Index and to identify bowel resection predictors. Methods We analyzed consecutive patients with CD retrospectively. The Lémann Index was determined at the point of inclusion and at follow-up termination. The Paris definition was used to subdivide patients into early and late CD groups. Results We included 154 patients, comprising 70 with early CD and 84 with late CD. After follow-up for 17.0 months, more patients experienced a decrease in the Lémann Index (61.4% vs. 42.9%), and fewer patients showed an increase in the Lémann Index (20% vs. 35.7%) in the early compared with the late CD group. Infliximab and other therapies reversed bowel damage to a greater extent in early CD patients than in late CD patients. Twenty-two patients underwent intestinal surgery, involving 5 patients in the early CD group and 17 patients in the late CD group. Three independent predictors of bowel resection were identified: baseline Lémann index ≥ 8.99, disease behavior B1, and history of intestinal surgery. Conclusions Early intervention within 18 months after CD diagnosis could reverse bowel damage and decrease short-term intestinal resection. Patients with CD with a history of intestinal surgery, and/or a Lémann index > 8.99 should be treated aggressively and monitored carefully to prevent progressive bowel damage.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document