scholarly journals Left atrial dysfunction in patients with prosthesis-patient mismatch after transcatheter aortic valve replacement

2021 ◽  
Vol 22 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
D Cadil ◽  
A Calin ◽  
CA Parasca ◽  
A Mateescu ◽  
M Rosca ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Aortic Valve ◽  
Aortic Valve Replacement ◽  
Strain Rate ◽  
Valve Replacement ◽  
Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement ◽  
Contractile Function ◽  
Left Ventricular ◽  
Short Term ◽  
Diastolic Strain Rate ◽  
Transcatheter Aortic Valve

Abstract Funding Acknowledgements Type of funding sources: None. Background. Transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) prostheses have better hemodynamics compared to surgical prostheses, with lower incidence of prosthesis-patient mismatch (PPM). Nonetheless, this complication is neither rare nor benign in the expanding population of TAVR patients (pts). Data regarding the effect of TAVR PPM on cardiac function is scarce. Our aim was to determine the short-term impact of PPM on left atrium (LA) function in patients undergoing transfemoral TAVR. Methods. One hundred forty-three consecutive pts (76.3 ± 7.5 yrs, 74 men) considered to be at high risk for SAVR were enrolled and examined before and 30 days after TAVR. All pts underwent a comprehensive echocardiogram, including speckle tracking echocardiography (STE) for LA and left ventricular (LV) strain analysis. Longitudinal LA strain parameters were assessed from the apical 4-chamber view. Peak values of global longitudinal LA strain (LAε) and LA systolic strain rate (SSr, reservoir function) and early diastolic strain rate (ESr, conduit function) were measured in all. Contractile LA function (late diastolic strain rate, ASr) was assessed in patients in sinus rhythm (106 pts). Results. Fifty-five pts (38%) had PPM (defined as an indexed effective orifice area, EOA ≤0.85 cm2/m2). Most of these pts (71%) had moderate PPM (indexed EOA between 0.65 and 0.85 cm2/m2). No significant differences in age (76.4 ± 8.1 vs 76.3 ± 7.2 yrs, p = 0.9), gender (p = 0.2), body surface area (p = 0.8), body mass index (p = 0.2) and the presence of cardiovascular risk factors (p > 0.2 for all) were observed between pts with and without PPM. The severity of post-TAVR aortic regurgitation was mild in 92 pts (64%) and moderate in 12 pts (8%) without any significant difference between pts with and without PPM. The post-TAVR prevalence of ³moderate mitral regurgitation was not different between the two groups (p = 0.40). After TAVR, there were no significant differences in terms of indexed LV mass, volumes, ejection fraction (p > 0.5 for all). LV global longitudinal strain was also similar between groups (-13.7 ± 4.3 vs -14 ± 3.6%, p = 0.7). Although LA volumes were similar between patients with and without PPM (47.8 ± 12.4 vs 49.3 ± 20.3 ml/m2, p = 0.6), in the mismatch-group we found a significantly reduced systolic global LA strain (12.7 ± 6.2 vs 15.9 ± 7.9%, p = 0.009) and impaired LA contractile function (ASr: -1.0 ± 0.4 vs -1.2 ± 0.5, p = 0.03). Parameters of LV diastolic function were also worse in the mismatch-group, with an E/e’sep ratio of 22 ± 10 vs 17 ± 7, p = 0.01. Conclusions. In our study group TAVR was associated with an incidence of PPM of 38%. The short-term follow-up of these patients revealed a significantly impaired LA function and increased LV filling pressure in patients with PPM compared to those without PPM. To our knowledge, this is the first report about the effect of PPM on the LA global and contractile function.

scholarly journals More in, better out? Successful valve-in-valve procedure of an iatrogenic ventricular septal defect following transcatheter aortic valve replacement: a case report

2021 ◽  
Vol 5 (5) ◽  
Author(s):  
Klaus-Dieter Hönemann ◽  
Steffen Hofmann ◽  
Frank Ritter ◽  
Gerold Mönnig
Keyword(s):  
Aortic Valve ◽  
Ventricular Septal Defect ◽  
Aortic Valve Replacement ◽  
Valve Replacement ◽  
Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement ◽  
Septal Defect ◽  
Left Ventricular ◽  
Heart Team ◽  
Transcatheter Aortic Valve ◽  
Valve In Valve

Abstract Background A rare, but serious, complication following transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) is the occurrence of an iatrogenic ventricular septal defect (VSD). Case summary We describe a case of an 80-year-old female who was referred with severe aortic stenosis for TAVR. Following thorough evaluation, the heart team consensus was to proceed with implantation via a transapical approach of an ACURATE neo M 25 mm valve (Boston Scientific, Natick, MA, USA). The valve was deployed harnessing transoesophageal echocardiographic (TOE) guidance under rapid pacing with post-dilation. Directly afterwards a very high VSD close to the aortic annulus was detected. As the patient was haemodynamically stable, the procedure was ended. The next day another TOE revealed a shunt volume (left-to-right ventricle) between 50% and 60%. Because the defect was partly located between the stent struts of the ACURATE valve decision was made to fix this leakage with implantation of a further valve and we chose an EVOLUT Pro 29 mm (Medtronic Inc., Minneapolis, MN, USA). The valve-in-valve was implanted 2–3 mm below the lower edge of the first valve, more towards the left ventricular outflow tract (LVOT) with excellent result: VSD was reduced to a very small residual shunt without any hemodynamic relevance. Discussion We suggest that an iatrogenic VSD located near the annulus may be treated percutaneously in a bail-out situation with implantation of a second valve that should be implanted slightly more into the LVOT to cover the VSD.

Abstract 16138: Validation of a Non-invasive Approach for the Assessment of Left Ventricular-arterial Coupling Following Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement

Circulation ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 142 (Suppl_3) ◽  
Author(s):  
Emad Mogadam ◽  
David Shavelle ◽  
Jing Liu ◽  
Gregory Giesler ◽  
Ray Matthews ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Aortic Valve ◽  
Aortic Valve Replacement ◽  
Valve Replacement ◽  
Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement ◽  
Systolic Function ◽  
Aortic Pressure ◽  
Left Ventricular ◽  
Arterial Elastance ◽  
Invasive Approach ◽  
Transcatheter Aortic Valve

Introduction: Transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) is an established treatment for patients with severe, symptomatic aortic stenosis (AS). Ventriculoarterial (LV-arterial) coupling defined as the ratio of total arterial elastance (Ea) to left ventricular end-systolic elastance (Ees) reflects effective cardiac energetics and is a well-accepted index for quantification of LV-arterial coupling. Despite its usefulness, estimating Ees/Ea has technical difficulties. Intrinsic Frequency (IF) method is a noninvasive and single waveform system-based approach for quantification of LV-arterial coupling. The objective of this study was to compare IF variables with Ea/Ees in predicting optimum LV-arterial energetics following TAVR. Method: Twenty-eight patients with severe AS, undergoing TAVR were included. Mean age was 85±4, 53% male with mean ejection fraction 59±6.4. IFs during systole (ω1), diastole (ω2), and total IF variation (Δω=ω1-ω2) were computed from the ascending aortic pressure waveforms at baseline and following TAVR. Ea/Ees was computed using single-beat technique proposed by Takeuchi et al. ( Circulation . 1991;83(1):202-212). Results: There was a significant decrease in Ea/Ees (p<0.001) toward optimum coupling immediately after TAVR (Figure 1a). There was a statistically significant correlation between Ea/Ees and Δω (r= 0.68, p<0.01) (Figure 1b). Conclusion: IF appears to be an accurate and reliable index for quantification of LV-arterial coupling given significant concordance with Ea/Ees. The management of patients with acutely altered hemodynamic states post TAVR can benefit from the assessment of LV-arterial coupling. Since IFs can be measured noninvasively using hand-held devices (e.g. an iPhone), this approach should broaden the clinical applicability of this useful parameter for assessing systolic function, therapeutic response and ventricular-arterial interaction post TAVR.

scholarly journals Effect of Eccentric Calcification of an Aortic Valve on the Implant Depth of a Venus-A Prosthesis During Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement: A Retrospective Study

2021 ◽  
Vol 12 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lanlan Li ◽  
Yang Liu ◽  
Ping Jin ◽  
Jiayou Tang ◽  
Linhe Lu ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Aortic Valve ◽  
Aortic Valve Replacement ◽  
Valve Replacement ◽  
Aortic Root ◽  
Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement ◽  
Ventricular Outflow Tract ◽  
Left Ventricular ◽  
Release Process ◽  
Standard Position ◽  
Transcatheter Aortic Valve

ObjectOur goal was to assess the implant depth of a Venus-A prosthesis during transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) when the areas of eccentric calcification were distributed in different sections of the aortic valve.MethodsA total of 53 patients with eccentric calcification of the aortic valve who underwent TAVR with a Venus-A prosthesis from January 2018 to November 2019 were retrospectively analyzed. The patients were divided into three groups (A, B, and C) according to the location of the eccentric calcification, which was determined by preprocedural computerized tomography angiography (CTA) images. The prosthesis release process and position were evaluated by contrast aortography during TAVR, and the differences in valve implant depths were compared among the three groups. The effects of different aortic root structures and procedural strategies on prosthesis implant depth were analyzed.ResultsEleven patients had eccentric calcification in region A; 19 patients, in region B; and 23 patients, in region C. The patients with eccentric calcification in region B had a higher risk of prosthesis migration (10.5% upward and 21.1% downward), and the position of the prosthesis after TAVR in group B was the deepest among the three groups. When eccentric calcification was located in region A or C, the prosthesis was released at the standard position with more stability, and the location of the prosthesis was less deep after TAVR (region A: 4.12 ± 3.4 mm; region B: 10.2 ± 5.3 mm; region C: 8.4 ± 4.0 mm; region A vs. region B, P = 0.0004; region C vs. region B; and P = 0.0360). In addition, the left ventricular outflow tract (LVOT) (P = 0.0213) and aortic root angulation (P = 0.0263) also had a significant effect on implant depth in the aortic root structure of the patients. The prosthesis size was 28.3 ± 2.4 in the deep implant group and 26.4 ± 2.0 in the appropriate implant group (P = 0.0068).ConclusionThe implant depth of the Venus-A prosthesis is closely related to the distribution of eccentric calcification in the aortic valve during TAVR. Surgeons should adjust the surgical strategy according to aortic root morphology to prevent prosthesis migration.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document