scholarly journals P1340 Clinical report: alert to iatrogenia

2020 ◽  
Vol 21 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
B Redondo Bermejo ◽  
M M De La Torre Carpente ◽  
M C Alonso Rodriguez ◽  
C Tapia Ballesteros ◽  
J C Munoz San Jose ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Pericardial Effusion ◽  
Cardiac Injury ◽  
Invasive Procedure ◽  
Pericardial Tamponade ◽  
Percutaneous Closure ◽  
Surgical Removal ◽  
Unusual Complication ◽  
Clinical Report ◽  
Pericardial Window ◽  
Left Pleural Effusion

Abstract Background Leftatrial appendageclosure is an alternative to systemic anticoagulation for stroke prevention in appropriate atrial fibrillation patients,however, it is not without complications. Most complications arise during the procedure and in the following days, however they can also be extended over time and therefore, we must be alert. Case summary We present the clinical case of a 68-year-old man admitted to our hospital three weeks after being discharged due to a percutaneous closure of the left appendage complicated with a pericardial tamponade resolved mediated pericadiocentesis with pericarditis clinic with persistent severe pericardial effusion. After a week without being able to remove the drainage tube, he required pericardiotomy due to superinfection with adequate subsequent evolution. In the following weeks he presented a recurrent left pleural effusion that required several evacuating thoracocentesis. After last thoracocentesis, he presented a cardiac perforation showing the catheter lodged in the pulmonary artery in the chest Computed Tomography, so he was again submitted to cardiac surgery for catheter extraction. Finally after stabilization, the patient could be discharged and after 6 months of follow-up he is stable and without new complications. Discussion Post-cardiac injury syndromes is a group of inflammatory pericardial syndromes including post-myocardial infarction pericarditis, post-pericardiotomy syndrome and post-traumatic pericarditis iatrogenic or not, that’s include pericarditis after invasive cardiac interventions. It is presumed that these syndromes have an autoimmune pathogenesis triggered by an initial damage and after a latent period of a few weeks are revealed. Our patient evidence of pericardial effusion with elevated CRP several weeks after a cardiac injury due to perforated during a percutaneous closure of the left appendage complicated with a pericardial tamponade resolved mediated pericadiocentesis. The persistent effusion motivated he imposibility of removed pericadiocentesis tube, and it superinfecction required an urgent pericardiotomy. After pericardial window, the effusion continued into the left pleural. The perforation of cardiac cavities after an evacuatorythoracocentesis is a described but unusual complication that requires surgical removal. Our patient survived a pericardiocentesis, several evacuatorythoracocentesis and two cardiac surgeries, all after a percutaneous closure of the left appendage. Conclusion Any invasive procedure presents a risk of iatrogenic complication, especially in elderly patients with comorbidities. We must be alert and start a treatment as soon as possible to solve the problem. Abstract P1340 Figure. Chest-CT_EECHO2019

The Diagnostic Value of Pericardial Fluid and Pericardial Biopsy: Single Center Experiences

2016 ◽  
Vol 19 (1) ◽  
pp. 023 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mehmet Yildirim ◽  
Recep Ustaalioglu ◽  
Murat Erkan ◽  
Bala Basak Oven Ustaalioglu ◽  
Hatice Demirbag ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Pericardial Effusion ◽  
Thoracoscopic Surgery ◽  
Pericardial Tamponade ◽  
Pericardial Fluid ◽  
Pathological Examination ◽  
Common Disease ◽  
Pericardial Window ◽  
Surgical Interventions ◽  
History Of ◽  
Recurrent Pericardial Effusion

<strong>Background:</strong> Patients with recurrent pericardial effusion and pericardial tamponade are usually treated in thoracic surgery clinics by VATS (video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery) or open pericardial window operation. The diagnostic importance of pathological evaluation of the pericardial fluid and tissue in the same patients has been reported in few studies. We reviewed pathological examination of the pericardial tissue and fluid specimens and the effect on the clinical treatment in our clinic, and compared the results with the literature. <br /><strong>Methods:</strong> We retrospectively analyzed 174 patients who underwent pericardial window operation due to pericardial tamponade or recurrent pericardial effusion. For all patients both the results of the pericardial fluid and pericardial biopsy specimen were evaluated. Clinicopathological factors were analyzed by using descriptive analysis. <br /><strong>Results:</strong> Median age was 61 (range, 20-94 years). The most common benign diagnosis was chronic inflammation (94 patients) by pericardial biopsy. History of malignancy was present in 28 patients (16.1%) and the most common disease was lung cancer (14 patients). A total of 24 patients (13.8%) could be diagnosed as having malignancy by pericardial fluid or pericardial biopsy examination. The malignancy was recognized for 12 patients who had a history of cancer; 9 of 12 with pericardial biopsy, 7 diagnosed by pericardial fluid. Twelve of 156 patients were recognized as having underlying malignancy by pericardial biopsy (n = 9) or fluid examination (n = 10), without known malignancy previously. <br /><strong>Conclusion:</strong> Recurrent pericardial effusion/pericardial tamponade are entities frequently diagnosed, and surgical interventions may be needed either for diagnosis and/or treatment, but specific etiology can rarely be obtained in spite of pathological examination of either pericardial tissue or fluid. For increasing the probability of a specific diagnosis both the pericardial fluid and the pericardial tissues have to be sent for pathologic examination.

Abstract 16344: Pericardial Complications in Patients With COVID-19: A Systematic Review of Published Cases

Circulation ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 142 (Suppl_3) ◽  
Author(s):  
Sandeep Singh ◽  
Akhil Jain ◽  
Priyanka Chaudhari ◽  
Faizan Ahmad Malik ◽  
Virmitra Desai ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Heart Failure ◽  
Pericardial Effusion ◽  
Cardiac Tamponade ◽  
Troponin I ◽  
Case Reports ◽  
Cardiac Injury ◽  
Pericardial Tamponade ◽  
Time Interval ◽  
Cardiac Damage ◽  
St Segment Elevation

Introduction: COVID-19 has been linked to cardiac damage and life-threatening pericardial complication on which data are trivial which incited us to perform this review of published case reports. Methods: PubMed/Medline, Web of Science and SCOPUS were searched until June 2020 for case reports on COVID-19-associated pericarditis, cardiac tamponade or pericardial effusion. Results: We identified 8 articles reporting 11 COVID-19 positive cases [mean age: 51.4±14.3 (34-78 yrs) 5 male/6 female)] with pericardial complications. All (100%) cases were COVID-19 positive at the presentation with ~80% having dyspnea, chest pain and cough. Time interval from first symptom to pericardial effusion was 7±8 (1-26) days. Five patients reported heart failure with reduced EF on echocardiography with mean LVEF 36.25%±8.54%. All patients showed nearly normal Troponin-I without angiographically significant stenosis except one. Out of 8 cases on echocardiography 4 cases reported with diffuse hypokinesia, 2 reported inferior and inferolateral walls hypokinesia and 2 reported signs of pericardial tamponade. Out of 11 patients, cardiovascular risk factors in the form of diabetes or hypertension or obesity were present in 5 patients. Cardiovascular comorbidities such as heart failure with low ejection fraction, non-ischemic cardiomyopathy and prior myocarditis were present in 3 patients. ST-segment elevation in 3, sinus tachycardia in 2, T wave inversion in 1 case were noted. Four patients developed cardiac tamponade, 1 developed takotsubo syndrome and 3 patients died. Conclusions: COVID-19 patients had signs of a high burden of cardiac injury. Pericardial complications (pericardial effusion and cardiac tamponade) remain infrequent complications which may require prompt care to avoid mortality.

scholarly journals Incarcerated intrapericardial diaphragmatic hernia after laparoscopic pericardial window for malignant pericardial effusion

2021 ◽  
Vol 2 (5) ◽  
Author(s):  
Ekhlas S Bardisi ◽  
◽  
Luning Redmer ◽  
Luk Verlaeckt ◽  
Filip Vanrykel ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Pericardial Effusion ◽  
Diaphragmatic Hernia ◽  
Lung Ventilation ◽  
Pericardial Tamponade ◽  
Pericardial Window ◽  
Malignant Pericardial Effusion ◽  
Minimally Invasive Surgical ◽  
Thoracic Drainage ◽  
Treatment Measures ◽  
Intrapericardial Diaphragmatic Hernia

Laparoscopic Pericardial Window (LPW) is a safe, minimally invasive surgical technique for treating pericardial effusion/tamponade. This technique allows adequate decompression and avoids single-lung ventilation and the need for thoracic drainage in severely ill patients; it also provides anatomopathological and microbiological diagnosis leading to treatment measures. An intrapericardial diaphragmatic hernia is among the rarest complications of this procedure. A 85-year-old man, who underwent LPW for pericardial tamponade, presented to the emergency department 12 days post-operative with bowel obstruction; CT scan showed an incarcerated hernia into the pericardial sac. Laparoscopic reduction and hernia repair were performed using a large-pore Mesh to allow further drainage of histologically proven malignant pericardial effusion. Keywords: pericardial tamponade; pericardial window; surgical drainage of pericardial effusion; intra-pericardial diaphragmatic hernia.

Right Ventricle Mass Removal from Tricuspid Valve Apparatus: An Unusual Thromboembolic Complication of Severe Ketoacidosis

2016 ◽  
Vol 19 (2) ◽  
pp. 077
Author(s):  
Ireneusz Haponiuk ◽  
Maciej Chojnicki ◽  
Konrad Paczkowski ◽  
Wojciech Kosiak ◽  
Radosław Jaworski ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Right Ventricle ◽  
Tricuspid Valve ◽  
Mild Hypothermia ◽  
Heart Function ◽  
Thromboembolic Complication ◽  
Surgical Removal ◽  
Unusual Complication ◽  
Type I ◽  
Definitive Therapy ◽  
The Right

The presence of a pathologic mass in the right ventricle (RV) may lead to hemodynamic consequences and to a life-threatening incident of pulmonary embolism. The diagnosis of an unstable thrombus in the right heart chamber usually necessitates intensive treatment to dissolve or remove the pathology. We present a report of an unusual complication of severe ketoacidosis: thrombus in the right ventricle, removed from the tricuspid valve (TV) apparatus. A four-year-old boy was diagnosed with diabetes mellitus (DM) type I de novo. During hospitalization, a 13.9 × 8.4 mm tumor in the RV was found in a routine cardiac ultrasound. The patient was referred for surgical removal of the floating lesion from the RV. The procedure was performed via midline sternotomy with extracorporeal circulation (ECC) and mild hypothermia. Control echocardiography showed complete tumor excision with normal atrioventricular valves and heart function. Surgical removal of the thrombus from the tricuspid valve apparatus was effective, safe, and a definitive therapy for thromboembolic complication of pediatric severe ketoacidosis.<br /><br />

scholarly journals Pericardial effusion and cardiac tamponade requiring pericardial window in an otherwise healthy 30-year-old patient with COVID-19: a case report

2020 ◽  
Vol 14 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Christina Walker ◽  
Vincent Peyko ◽  
Charles Farrell ◽  
Jeanine Awad-Spirtos ◽  
Matthew Adamo ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Case Report ◽  
Pericardial Effusion ◽  
Cardiac Tamponade ◽  
Case Reports ◽  
Healthy Woman ◽  
Signs And Symptoms ◽  
Rare Presentation ◽  
Pericardial Window ◽  
Acute Pericarditis ◽  
Novel Coronavirus

Abstract Background This case report demonstrates pericardial effusion, acute pericarditis, and cardiac tamponade in an otherwise healthy woman who had a positive test result for coronavirus disease 2019. Few case reports have been documented on patients with this presentation, and it is important to share novel presentations of the disease as they are discovered. Case presentation A Caucasian patient with coronavirus disease 2019 returned to the emergency department of our hospital 2 days after her initial visit with worsening chest pain and shortness of breath. Imaging revealed new pericardial effusion since the previous visit. The patient became hypotensive, was taken for pericardial window for cardiac tamponade with a drain placed, and was treated for acute pericarditis. Conclusion Much is still unknown about the implications of coronavirus disease 2019. With the novel coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic, research is still in process, and we are slowly learning about new signs and symptoms of the disease. This case report documents a lesser-known presentation of a patient with coronavirus disease 2019 and will help to further understanding of a rare presentation.

Video-Assisted Pericardial Fenestration for Effusions after Cardiac Surgery

2009 ◽  
Vol 17 (5) ◽  
pp. 480-482 ◽  
Author(s):  
Georgios P Georghiou ◽  
Eyal Porat ◽  
Avi Fuks ◽  
Bernardo A Vidne ◽  
Milton Saute
Keyword(s):  
Cardiac Surgery ◽  
Pericardial Effusion ◽  
Surgical Techniques ◽  
Lung Ventilation ◽  
Pericardial Window ◽  
Invasive Approach ◽  
Video Assisted ◽  
Institutional Experience ◽  
Pericardial Fenestration ◽  
Thoracoscopic Technique

Delayed-onset pericardial effusion following cardiac surgery can give rise to significant morbidity due to its presentation as well as management by traditional surgical techniques. An institutional experience of a video-assisted thoracoscopic technique to create a pericardial window, with the advantages of a minimally invasive approach combined with excellent visualization in such patients, was reviewed. A retrospective analysis was conducted on all patients undergoing video-assisted thoracoscopic for delayed pericardial effusion after cardiac surgery from January 2001 to January 2006 at our center. Seven patients with echocardiographically diagnosed delayed tamponade underwent video-assisted thoracoscopy; 5 were receiving anticoagulants after valve replacement, and 2 had undergone heart transplantation. Pericardial windows were created under general anesthesia and single-lung ventilation using 2 to 3 trocars. Mean operative time was 45 min. There were no complications of the thoracoscopic technique. Video-assisted thoracoscopic creation of a pericardial window is safe and effective treatment for loculated pericardial effusions secondary to cardiac surgery.

scholarly journals US Database Study of Clinical Burden and Unmet Need in Recurrent Pericarditis

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Allan Klein ◽  
Paul Cremer ◽  
Apostolos Kontzias ◽  
Muhammad Furqan ◽  
Ryan Tubman ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Pericardial Effusion ◽  
Cardiac Tamponade ◽  
Treatment Response ◽  
Constrictive Pericarditis ◽  
Unmet Need ◽  
Recurrent Pericarditis ◽  
Pericardial Window ◽  
Clinical Burden ◽  
Large Pericardial Effusion ◽  
Multiple Recurrences

Background Patients with recurrent pericarditis (RP) may develop complications, multiple recurrences, or inadequate treatment response. This study aimed to characterize disease burden and unmet needs in RP. Methods and Results This retrospective US database analysis included newly diagnosed patients with RP with ≥24 months of continuous history following their first pericarditis episode. RP was defined as ≥2 pericarditis episodes ≥28 days apart. Some patients had ≥2 recurrences, while others had a single recurrence with a serious complication, ie, constrictive pericarditis, cardiac tamponade, or a large pericardial effusion with pericardiocentesis/pericardial window. Among these patients with multiple recurrences and/or complications, some had features relating to treatment history, including long‐term corticosteroid use (corticosteroids started within 30 days of flare, continuing ≥90 consecutive days) or inadequate treatment response (pericarditis recurring despite corticosteroids and/or colchicine, or other drugs [excluding NSAIDs] within 30 days of flare, or prior pericardiectomy). Patients (N=2096) had hypertension (60%), cardiomegaly (9%), congestive heart failure (17%), atrial fibrillation (16%), autoimmune diseases (18%), diabetes mellitus (21%), renal disease (20%), anxiety (21%), and depression (14%). Complications included pericardial effusion (50%), cardiac tamponade (9%), and constrictive pericarditis (4%). Pharmacotherapy included colchicine (51%), NSAIDs (40%), and corticosteroids (30%), often in combination. This study estimates 37 000 US patients with RP; incidence was 6.0/100 000/year (95% CI, 5.6‒6.3), and prevalence was 11.2/100 000 (95% CI, 10.6‒11.7). Conclusions Patients with RP may have multiple recurrences and/or complications, often because of inadequate treatment response and persistent underlying disease. Corticosteroid use is frequent despite known side‐effect risks, potentially exacerbated by prevalent comorbidities. Substantial clinical burden and lack of effective treatments underscore the high unmet need.

scholarly journals Capnocytophaga Induced Acute Necrotizing and Exudative Pericarditis with Abscess Formation

2018 ◽  
Vol 2018 ◽  
pp. 1-3
Author(s):  
Alexa Bello ◽  
Alejandro Castaneda ◽  
Abhay Vakil ◽  
Joseph Varon ◽  
Salim Surani
Keyword(s):  
Pulmonary Embolism ◽  
Pericardial Effusion ◽  
Broad Spectrum ◽  
Developed Countries ◽  
Abscess Formation ◽  
Pericardial Window ◽  
Acute Pericarditis ◽  
Large Pericardial Effusion ◽  
Acute Necrotizing ◽  
Pericardial Abscess

We present the case of a 55-year-old gentleman, with bilateral pulmonary embolism and a large pericardial effusion that lead to a pericardial window with evacuation of creamy pus. Gram stains were negative, with culture growing Capnocytophaga. Pathology revealed acute necrotizing and exudative changes, including frank abscess formation. In developed countries, pericardial abscess and acute pericarditis are uncommon due to availability of broad-spectrum antibiotics. Pericardial abscess due to Capnocytophaga is even more uncommon.

The pericardium and pericardial disease

2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
David Sidebotham ◽  
Alan Merry ◽  
Malcolm Legget ◽  
Gavin Wright
Keyword(s):  
Pericardial Effusion ◽  
Constrictive Pericarditis ◽  
Restrictive Cardiomyopathy ◽  
Transoesophageal Echocardiography ◽  
Pericardial Tamponade ◽  
Acute Pericarditis ◽  
Pericardial Disease ◽  
Mechanically Ventilated ◽  
Spectral Doppler ◽  
Echocardiographic Assessment

Chapter 16 is a new chapter from earlier editions of Practical Perioperative Transoesophageal Echocardiography. It provides a short summary on the echocardiographic assessment of the normal pericardium and on pericardial disease. The characteristic TOE features of pericardial pathology (cysts, acute pericarditis, pericardial effusion, pericardial tamponade, and constrictive pericarditis) are reviewed. In particular, pericardial constriction is discussed in detail, including outlining the features that distinguish pericardial constriction from restrictive cardiomyopathy. Wherever possible, the spectral Doppler abnormalities associated with pericardial constriction and pericardial tamponade are discussed with reference to patients who are mechanically ventilated.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document