Incarcerated intrapericardial diaphragmatic hernia after laparoscopic pericardial window for malignant pericardial effusion

Laparoscopic Pericardial Window (LPW) is a safe, minimally invasive surgical technique for treating pericardial effusion/tamponade. This technique allows adequate decompression and avoids single-lung ventilation and the need for thoracic drainage in severely ill patients; it also provides anatomopathological and microbiological diagnosis leading to treatment measures. An intrapericardial diaphragmatic hernia is among the rarest complications of this procedure. A 85-year-old man, who underwent LPW for pericardial tamponade, presented to the emergency department 12 days post-operative with bowel obstruction; CT scan showed an incarcerated hernia into the pericardial sac. Laparoscopic reduction and hernia repair were performed using a large-pore Mesh to allow further drainage of histologically proven malignant pericardial effusion. Keywords: pericardial tamponade; pericardial window; surgical drainage of pericardial effusion; intra-pericardial diaphragmatic hernia.

Download Full-text

Pericardial Window Formation Complicated by Intrapericardial Diaphragmatic Hernia

Case Reports in Surgery ◽

10.1155/2014/132170 ◽

2014 ◽

Vol 2014 ◽

pp. 1-3 ◽

Cited By ~ 3

Author(s):

Jeremy Docekal ◽

Thomas Fabian

Keyword(s):

Pericardial Effusion ◽

Surgical Procedures ◽

Diaphragmatic Hernia ◽

Diaphragmatic Defect ◽

Congenital Defects ◽

Pericardial Window ◽

Pericardial Space ◽

Abdominal Symptoms ◽

Septum Transversum ◽

Intrapericardial Diaphragmatic Hernia

In rare circumstances, a diaphragmatic defect may allow for herniation of intra-abdominal contents into the pericardial space. These occurrences are exceedingly rare and may be due to trauma or congenital defects of the septum transversum or as the result of surgical procedures. We describe a 73-year-old female who presented with cardiac and abdominal symptoms one month after undergoing a subxiphoid pericardioperitoneal window for treatment and evaluation of a symptomatic pericardial effusion.

Download Full-text

The Diagnostic Value of Pericardial Fluid and Pericardial Biopsy: Single Center Experiences

The Heart Surgery Forum ◽

10.1532/hsf.1328 ◽

2016 ◽

Vol 19 (1) ◽

pp. 023 ◽

Cited By ~ 2

Author(s):

Mehmet Yildirim ◽

Recep Ustaalioglu ◽

Murat Erkan ◽

Bala Basak Oven Ustaalioglu ◽

Hatice Demirbag ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Pericardial Effusion ◽

Thoracoscopic Surgery ◽

Pericardial Tamponade ◽

Pericardial Fluid ◽

Pathological Examination ◽

Common Disease ◽

Pericardial Window ◽

Surgical Interventions ◽

History Of ◽

Recurrent Pericardial Effusion

Background: Patients with recurrent pericardial effusion and pericardial tamponade are usually treated in thoracic surgery clinics by VATS (video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery) or open pericardial window operation. The diagnostic importance of pathological evaluation of the pericardial fluid and tissue in the same patients has been reported in few studies. We reviewed pathological examination of the pericardial tissue and fluid specimens and the effect on the clinical treatment in our clinic, and compared the results with the literature. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed 174 patients who underwent pericardial window operation due to pericardial tamponade or recurrent pericardial effusion. For all patients both the results of the pericardial fluid and pericardial biopsy specimen were evaluated. Clinicopathological factors were analyzed by using descriptive analysis. Results: Median age was 61 (range, 20-94 years). The most common benign diagnosis was chronic inflammation (94 patients) by pericardial biopsy. History of malignancy was present in 28 patients (16.1%) and the most common disease was lung cancer (14 patients). A total of 24 patients (13.8%) could be diagnosed as having malignancy by pericardial fluid or pericardial biopsy examination. The malignancy was recognized for 12 patients who had a history of cancer; 9 of 12 with pericardial biopsy, 7 diagnosed by pericardial fluid. Twelve of 156 patients were recognized as having underlying malignancy by pericardial biopsy (n = 9) or fluid examination (n = 10), without known malignancy previously. Conclusion: Recurrent pericardial effusion/pericardial tamponade are entities frequently diagnosed, and surgical interventions may be needed either for diagnosis and/or treatment, but specific etiology can rarely be obtained in spite of pathological examination of either pericardial tissue or fluid. For increasing the probability of a specific diagnosis both the pericardial fluid and the pericardial tissues have to be sent for pathologic examination.

Download Full-text

Video-Assisted Pericardial Fenestration for Effusions after Cardiac Surgery

Asian Cardiovascular and Thoracic Annals ◽

10.1177/0218492309348505 ◽

2009 ◽

Vol 17 (5) ◽

pp. 480-482 ◽

Cited By ~ 5

Author(s):

Georgios P Georghiou ◽

Eyal Porat ◽

Avi Fuks ◽

Bernardo A Vidne ◽

Milton Saute

Keyword(s):

Cardiac Surgery ◽

Pericardial Effusion ◽

Surgical Techniques ◽

Lung Ventilation ◽

Pericardial Window ◽

Invasive Approach ◽

Video Assisted ◽

Institutional Experience ◽

Pericardial Fenestration ◽

Thoracoscopic Technique

Delayed-onset pericardial effusion following cardiac surgery can give rise to significant morbidity due to its presentation as well as management by traditional surgical techniques. An institutional experience of a video-assisted thoracoscopic technique to create a pericardial window, with the advantages of a minimally invasive approach combined with excellent visualization in such patients, was reviewed. A retrospective analysis was conducted on all patients undergoing video-assisted thoracoscopic for delayed pericardial effusion after cardiac surgery from January 2001 to January 2006 at our center. Seven patients with echocardiographically diagnosed delayed tamponade underwent video-assisted thoracoscopy; 5 were receiving anticoagulants after valve replacement, and 2 had undergone heart transplantation. Pericardial windows were created under general anesthesia and single-lung ventilation using 2 to 3 trocars. Mean operative time was 45 min. There were no complications of the thoracoscopic technique. Video-assisted thoracoscopic creation of a pericardial window is safe and effective treatment for loculated pericardial effusions secondary to cardiac surgery.

Download Full-text

QS7. Using Apache® III-J to Predict Outcome in Patients Undergoing Pericardial Window for Malignant Pericardial Effusion

Journal of Surgical Research ◽

10.1016/j.jss.2007.12.244 ◽

2008 ◽

Vol 144 (2) ◽

pp. 273

Author(s):

Faiz Y. Bhora ◽

Daniel Sagalovich ◽

M. Jawad Latif ◽

John Afthinos ◽

Cliff P. Connery

Keyword(s):

Pericardial Effusion ◽

Pericardial Window ◽

Malignant Pericardial Effusion

Download Full-text

Malignant pericardial effusion with cardiac tamponade in a patient with metastatic vaginal adenocarcinoma

International Journal of Gynecological Cancer ◽

10.1136/ijgc-00009577-200605000-00081 ◽

2006 ◽

Vol 16 (3) ◽

pp. 1458-1461 ◽

Cited By ~ 2

Author(s):

N. P. Nagarsheth ◽

M. Harrison ◽

T. Kalir ◽

J. Rahaman

Keyword(s):

Pericardial Effusion ◽

Cardiac Tamponade ◽

Lung Metastases ◽

Gynecological Cancer ◽

Disease Process ◽

Surgical Excision ◽

Clear Cell Adenocarcinoma ◽

Pericardial Window ◽

Malignant Pericardial Effusion ◽

Platinum Based Chemotherapy

Malignant pericardial effusion with cardiac tamponade is a rare manifestation of metastatic gynecological cancer. A 35-year-old female was diagnosed with clear cell adenocarcinoma of the vagina. Four years after partial vaginectomy, she developed regional recurrence and was treated with surgical excision followed by platinum-based chemotherapy and radiation therapy. Six years later, the patient was diagnosed with lung metastases and received a combination adriamycin and platinum-based chemotherapy. Shortly after completing treatment, she presented with weakness and was found to be hypotensive on physical exam. Computed tomography scan confirmed a pericardial effusion with evidence of bilateral heart failure. She underwent an emergent pericardiocentesis and eventual pericardial window procedure. Metastatic adenocarcinoma of the vagina can present with malignant pericardial effusion with cardiac tamponade. Therefore, gynecologists and gynecological oncologists need to be familiar with the diagnosis and management of this disease process.

Download Full-text

Subxiphoid window drainage of pericardial effusion - study of 35 cases

University Heart Journal ◽

10.3329/uhj.v5i2.4558 ◽

1970 ◽

Vol 5 (2) ◽

pp. 71-74 ◽

Cited By ~ 1

Author(s):

Rezwanul Hoque ◽

Mostafa Nuruzzaman ◽

Sabrina Sharmin Husain ◽

Zerzina Rahman

Keyword(s):

Pericardial Effusion ◽

Thoracoscopic Surgery ◽

Exclusion Criteria ◽

Pericardial Window ◽

Echocardiographic Finding ◽

Malignant Pericardial Effusion ◽

Physical Findings ◽

Age Range ◽

Effusive Constrictive Pericarditis ◽

Video Assisted Thoracoscopic Surgery

Pericardial effusion defines the presence of an abnormal amount and/or character of fluid in the pericardial space. It can be acute or chronic and caused by a variety of local and systemic disorders, or it may be idiopathic. Pericardial effusion can be relieved by medical treatment, pericardiocentesis through a needle with or without echocardiographic guidance, or by surgical procedures, such as subxiphoid pericardial tube drainage, by creating a pericardial window through a left anterior thoracotomy, or by video assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) Subxiphoid pericardial window drainages were done on 35 patients with symptomatic pericardial effusion in the Department of cardiac surgery, BSMMU, from February, 1995 through July, 2009, and were all included in this retrospective observational study. The inclusion criteria were an established diagnosis of pericardial effusion confirmed by history, physical findings and transthoracic echocardiography, hemodynamic alteration as evidenced by hypotension( systolic blood pressure < 90 mm of Hg), shortness of breath, echocardiographic finding of > 10 mm echo free space with/ without compression of heart, recurrence after pericardiocentesis, haemorrhagic or thick pericardial effusion and malignant pericardial effusion. The exclusion criteria were loculated or post surgical pericardial effusion, effusive constrictive pericarditis or where formal thoracotomy was applied for drainage of effusion. Patients were followed up at one month and three months following the drainage procedure. The age range was from 13 years to 70 years (Mean 47.86 ± SD 15.20 years), 19 (54.28%) were male, 16(45.72%) were female. The symptomatology varied but cardiac and respiratory decompression overwhelmed other symptoms. In this study tuberculosis is the most common cause of pericardial effusion, idiopathic and malignancies are other important causes. Subxiphoid window drainage is an effective process in relieving pericardial effusion and the reaccumulation rate is low. Key words: Subxiphoid window drainage; Surgical drainage of pericardial effusion; Pericardial effusion. DOI: 10.3329/uhj.v5i2.4558 University Heart Journal Vol.5(2) July 2009 pp.71-74

Download Full-text

P1340 Clinical report: alert to iatrogenia

European Heart Journal - Cardiovascular Imaging ◽

10.1093/ehjci/jez319.778 ◽

2020 ◽

Vol 21 (Supplement_1) ◽

Author(s):

B Redondo Bermejo ◽

M M De La Torre Carpente ◽

M C Alonso Rodriguez ◽

C Tapia Ballesteros ◽

J C Munoz San Jose ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Pericardial Effusion ◽

Cardiac Injury ◽

Invasive Procedure ◽

Pericardial Tamponade ◽

Percutaneous Closure ◽

Surgical Removal ◽

Unusual Complication ◽

Clinical Report ◽

Pericardial Window ◽

Left Pleural Effusion

Abstract Background Leftatrial appendageclosure is an alternative to systemic anticoagulation for stroke prevention in appropriate atrial fibrillation patients,however, it is not without complications. Most complications arise during the procedure and in the following days, however they can also be extended over time and therefore, we must be alert. Case summary We present the clinical case of a 68-year-old man admitted to our hospital three weeks after being discharged due to a percutaneous closure of the left appendage complicated with a pericardial tamponade resolved mediated pericadiocentesis with pericarditis clinic with persistent severe pericardial effusion. After a week without being able to remove the drainage tube, he required pericardiotomy due to superinfection with adequate subsequent evolution. In the following weeks he presented a recurrent left pleural effusion that required several evacuating thoracocentesis. After last thoracocentesis, he presented a cardiac perforation showing the catheter lodged in the pulmonary artery in the chest Computed Tomography, so he was again submitted to cardiac surgery for catheter extraction. Finally after stabilization, the patient could be discharged and after 6 months of follow-up he is stable and without new complications. Discussion Post-cardiac injury syndromes is a group of inflammatory pericardial syndromes including post-myocardial infarction pericarditis, post-pericardiotomy syndrome and post-traumatic pericarditis iatrogenic or not, that’s include pericarditis after invasive cardiac interventions. It is presumed that these syndromes have an autoimmune pathogenesis triggered by an initial damage and after a latent period of a few weeks are revealed. Our patient evidence of pericardial effusion with elevated CRP several weeks after a cardiac injury due to perforated during a percutaneous closure of the left appendage complicated with a pericardial tamponade resolved mediated pericadiocentesis. The persistent effusion motivated he imposibility of removed pericadiocentesis tube, and it superinfecction required an urgent pericardiotomy. After pericardial window, the effusion continued into the left pleural. The perforation of cardiac cavities after an evacuatorythoracocentesis is a described but unusual complication that requires surgical removal. Our patient survived a pericardiocentesis, several evacuatorythoracocentesis and two cardiac surgeries, all after a percutaneous closure of the left appendage. Conclusion Any invasive procedure presents a risk of iatrogenic complication, especially in elderly patients with comorbidities. We must be alert and start a treatment as soon as possible to solve the problem. Abstract P1340 Figure. Chest-CT_EECHO2019

Download Full-text

Cardiac tamponade due to malignant pericardial effusion in breast cancer: A case report

Bangabandhu Sheikh Mujib Medical University Journal ◽

10.3329/bsmmuj.v9i1.28946 ◽

2016 ◽

Vol 9 (1) ◽

pp. 53

Author(s):

Sultan Mahmud ◽

Omar Sadeque Khan ◽

Md. Aftabuddin ◽

Asit Baran Adhikary

Keyword(s):

Breast Cancer ◽

Pericardial Effusion ◽

Cardiac Tamponade ◽

Duct Cell ◽

Pericardial Fluid ◽

Pericardial Window ◽

Severe Respiratory Distress ◽

Malignant Pericardial Effusion ◽

History Of ◽

Subxiphoid Pericardial Window

We present a case of 35 years old women who presented to our institution with a history of bilateral infiltrating duct cell carcinoma of breast, chest pain with heaviness, severe respiratory distress and hypotension. Echocardiography revealed massive pericardial effusion with features of cardiac tamponade. The patient was treated with urgent pericardiocentesis followed by subxiphoid pericardial window drainage of 500ml of haemorrhagic pericardial fluid. Cytological examination confirmed the previous suspicious of malignancy. The patient tolerated the procedure very well, immediate symptomatic relief was observed.

Download Full-text