scholarly journals P1412 A new light to improve the view of the anatomical details during micro-invasive trans-ventricular repair of degenerative prolapse of mitral valve

2020 ◽  
Vol 21 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
A Vairo ◽  
M Marro ◽  
G Speziali ◽  
M Rinaldi ◽  
S Salizzoni
Keyword(s):  
Mitral Valve ◽  
Mitral Regurgitation ◽  
Mitral Valve Repair ◽  
Coming Out ◽  
Left Ventricular ◽  
Posterior Leaflet ◽  
Valve Repair ◽  
High Definition ◽  
Definition Of ◽  
Leaflet Prolapse

Abstract BACKGROUND Mitral valve repair is the preferred surgical treatment for severe mitral regurgitation due to degenerative leaflet prolapse. Within the growing era of transcatheter treatments for valvular heart disease, an innovative micro-invasive trans-ventricular beating-heart procedure was developed. Three-dimensional (3D) transoesophageal echocardiographic guidance is crucial to assist the operator in instrument navigation and chords positioning. 3D ultrasound technology is constantly evolving and a special light, that can be mobilized within the 3D images, has recently been invented. This light allows to illuminate the structures from different points of view and increase the definition of the anatomical details. PURPOSE To show the advantages of this new 3D image analysis technology, described above, through a sequence of intra-procedural images of a mitral valve repair by trans-ventricular polytetrafluoroethylene (ePTFE) chords implantation. METHODS The procedure is performed using a device that is introduced through a posterolateral ventriculotomy and it is advanced towards the mitral valve under real-time 3D transoesophageal guidance. The prolapsing segment, in this case central part of posterior leaflet (Fig. 1 A, B and C), is grasped with the jaw of the instrument (J in Fig. 1D), then the chords are implanted, tensioned and secured outside the ventricle. Figure 1A shows the pre-operative image of posterior leaflet prolapse with flail (P2 segment) and the light illuminates the valve from above. The broken chords (arrow in Fig. 1A) can be recognized with high definition. The light can also be placed on the valve plane (Fig. 1B) or below (Fig. 1C). When illumination occurs from the left ventricular side, the coaptation loss due to the P2 flail is highlighted (arrow in Fig. 1C). After placement, tensioning and securing the chords outside the ventricle, the prolapse disappears and the correct coaptation is re-established (Fig. 1E). The coaptation deficit is no longer visible, even with the light placed below the valve and it is possible to see the light coming out of the aortic valve (Ao), opened in systole, with mitral valve closed (Fig. 1F). RESULTS At the end of the procedure the residual mitral regurgitation was trivial and no loss of coaptation can be evidenced even with the light placed in the left ventricle (Fig. 1F). CONCLUSIONS This new light allows to improve the anatomical definition of 3D echocardiographic images, allows better visualization of the coaptation defects and can be used as a further verification of the result especially in cases of micro-invasive mitral repair. Abstract P1412 Figure 1

Butterfly technique in mitral valve repair

2020 ◽  
Vol 28 (7) ◽  
pp. 413-415
Author(s):  
Tohru Asai
Keyword(s):  
Mitral Valve ◽  
Mitral Regurgitation ◽  
Mitral Valve Repair ◽  
Systolic Anterior Motion ◽  
Posterior Leaflet ◽  
Valve Repair ◽  
Free Margin ◽  
Leaflet Prolapse

Degenerative mitral regurgitation due to posterior leaflet prolapse is often associated with tissue redundancy in the leaflet height and free margin of the prolapsing segment. The butterfly technique has been introduced for focal resection to precisely control the leaflet height without annular plication. This technique is indicated for a high prolapsing leaflet, greater than 20 mm. With intraoperative measurement of leaflet heights and ink dot marking as a depth indicator, the butterfly technique can be safely performed in most high posterior leaflet prolapse cases, without increasing the risk of systolic anterior motion.

scholarly journals Ventricular arrhythmias in patients with functional mitral regurgitation and implantable cardiac devices: implications of mitral valve repair with Mitraclip

2020 ◽  
Vol 41 (Supplement_2) ◽  
Author(s):  
T Benito Gonzalez ◽  
X Freixa ◽  
C Godino ◽  
M Taramasso ◽  
R Estevez-Loureiro ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Mitral Valve ◽  
Mitral Regurgitation ◽  
Mitral Valve Repair ◽  
Left Ventricular ◽  
Left Ventricular Ejection ◽  
Functional Mitral Regurgitation ◽  
Valve Repair ◽  
One Year ◽  
The Impact

Abstract Background Limited information has been reported regarding the impact of percutaneous mitral valve repair (PMVR) on ventricular arrhythmic (VA) burden. The aim of this study was to address the incidence of VA and appropriate antitachycardia implantable cardiac defibrillator (ICD) therapies before and after PMVR. Methods We retrospectively analyzed all consecutive patients with heart failure with reduce left ventricular ejection fraction, functional mitral regurgitation grade 3+ or 4+ and an active ICD or cardiac resynchronizer who underwent PMVR in any of the eleven recruiting centers. Only patients with complete available device VA monitoring from one-year before to one year after PMVR were included. Baseline clinical and echocardiographic characteristics were collected before PMVR and at 12-months follow-up. Results 93 patients (68.2±10.9 years old, male 88.2%) were enrolled. PMVR was successfully performed in all patients and device success at discharge was 91.4%. At 12-months follow-up, we observed a significant reduction in mitral regurgitation severity, NT-proBNP and prevalence of severe pulmonary hypertension and severe kidney disease. Patients also referred a significant improvement in NYHA functional class and showed a non-significant trend to reserve left ventricular remodeling. After PMVR a significant decrease in the incidence of non-sustained ventricular tachycardia (VT) (5.0–17.8 vs 2.7–13.5, p=0.002), sustained VT or ventricular fibrillation (0.9–2.5 vs 0.5–2.9, p=0.012) and ICD antitachycardia therapies (2.5–12.0 vs 0.9–5.0, p=0.033) were observed. Conclusion PMVR was related to a reduction in arrhythmic burden and ICD therapies in our cohort. Proportion of patients who presented ven Funding Acknowledgement Type of funding source: None

Surgery for Degenerative Mitral Regurgitation Valve Repair v. Valve Replacement with Chordal Preservation

1994 ◽  
Vol 2 (2) ◽  
pp. 90-94
Author(s):  
Masaharu Shigenobu ◽  
Shunji Sano
Keyword(s):  
Mitral Valve ◽  
Mitral Regurgitation ◽  
Left Ventricular Function ◽  
Ventricular Function ◽  
Valve Replacement ◽  
Mitral Valve Replacement ◽  
Mitral Valve Repair ◽  
Left Ventricular ◽  
Valve Repair ◽  
Repair Group

This study compares mitral valve repair and mitral valve replacement with chordal preservation for chronic mitral regurgitation due to myxomatous degeneration with special reference to left ventricular function. Twenty-six patients underwent complete preoperative and 2 years later postoperative echocardiography study. Thirteen patients underwent mitral valve replacement associated with preservation of chordae tendineae and papillary muscles, and 13 patients had mitral valve repair. There were no statistically significant differences between the 2 groups for clinical findings, hemodynamic profiles, or left ventricular function compared prior to surgery. After correcting mitral regurgitation, increase in cardiac index was significant for the repair group. Left ventricular end-diastolic volume decreased in both groups. Left ventricular end-systolic volume significantly decreased in the repair group, but remained unchanged in the replacement group. Both ejection fraction and mean left ventricular circumferential fiber shortening velocity (mVcf) decreased in the replacement group, but significantly increased in the repair group 2 years after surgery. These findings suggest valve replacement with chordal preservation shows less improvement in ventricular systolic function late after surgery compared with mitral valve repair.

scholarly journals Similar long-term results of mitral valve repair for anterior compared with posterior leaflet prolapse

2006 ◽  
Vol 131 (2) ◽  
pp. 364-370 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michele De Bonis ◽  
Roberto Lorusso ◽  
Elisabetta Lapenna ◽  
Samer Kassem ◽  
Giuseppe De Cicco ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Mitral Valve ◽  
Mitral Valve Repair ◽  
Long Term Results ◽  
Posterior Leaflet ◽  
Valve Repair ◽  
Leaflet Prolapse

scholarly journals Optimizing P2 Neochordal Length and Stability in Mitral Valve Repair With Use of a Polypropylene Loop

2020 ◽  
Vol 47 (3) ◽  
pp. 207-209
Author(s):  
Anil Ozen ◽  
Ertekin Utku Unal ◽  
Hamdi Mehmet Ozbek ◽  
Gorkem Yigit ◽  
Hakki Zafer Iscan
Keyword(s):  
Mitral Valve ◽  
Mitral Regurgitation ◽  
Mitral Valve Repair ◽  
Severe Mitral Regurgitation ◽  
Posterior Leaflet ◽  
Valve Repair ◽  
Chordae Tendineae ◽  
Optimal Length ◽  
Precise Method ◽  
Artificial Chordae

Determining the optimal length of artificial chordae tendineae and then effectively securing them is a major challenge in mitral valve repair. Our technique for measuring and stabilizing neochordae involves tying a polypropylene suture loop onto the annuloplasty ring. We used this method in 4 patients who had moderate-to-severe mitral regurgitation from degenerative posterior leaflet (P2) prolapse and flail chordae. Results of intraoperative saline tests and postoperative transesophageal echocardiography revealed only mild insufficiency. One month postoperatively, echocardiograms showed trivial regurgitation in all 4 patients. We think that this simple, precise method for adjusting and stabilizing artificial chordae will be advantageous in mitral valve repair.

scholarly journals Residual mitral regurgitation impact on outcomes after mitraclip therapy: five-year follow-up from the GRASP registry

2021 ◽  
Vol 22 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
AM Caggegi ◽  
P Capranzano ◽  
S Scandura ◽  
S Mangiafico ◽  
G Castania ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Mitral Valve ◽  
Mitral Regurgitation ◽  
Mitral Valve Repair ◽  
Primary Endpoint ◽  
Left Ventricular ◽  
Valve Repair ◽  
Surgical Risk ◽  
High Surgical Risk ◽  
Mitraclip Therapy

Abstract Funding Acknowledgements Type of funding sources: None. Background – Although percutaneous mitral valve repair is an attractive alternative treatment option for patients with severe mitral regurgitation (MR) at high surgical risk, residual MR is commonly observed after the procedure and little is known about its impact on outcomes after MitraClip therapy, expecially in patients with severe left ventricular (LV) impairment. Purpose – The aim of this prospective, observational study was to evaluate the impact of residual MR (MR ≤1+ vs. MR >1+) on long-term outcomes of mitral valve repair with the MitraClip System in high surgical risk patients presenting with moderate-to-severe or severe MR and with severe reduction of LV ejection fraction (EF). Methods – Patients enrolled in the prospective Getting Reduction of Mitral Insufficiency by Percutaneous Clip Implantation (GRASP) with functional MR and EF ≤30% who were eligible at almost five-year follow-up were included in the present analysis.  The primary endpoint was death at 5-year follow-up.  Also echocardiographic parameters at baseline and 5-year follow-up and rehospitalization rates were assessed. Results – A total of 139 patients were included: 92 (66.2%) with post-procedural residual MR ≤1+ and 47 (33.8%) with residual MR > 1+ (41 patients with residual MR 2+, 5 with residual MR 3+, 1 with residual MR 4+).  Comparable clinical and echocardiographic baseline characteristics were observed between the two groups except for NYHA functional class IV and implanted pace-maker (more frequent in patients with residual MR >1+) and previous myocardial infarction (more frequent  in patients with residual MR ≤1+). At 5-year follow-up, no significant differences were reported in the primary endpoint (49.6% in patients with residual MR ≤ 1+ vs. 65.3% in patients with residual MR > 1+, p 0.203) and in cardiac death (37.8% in patients with residual MR ≤ 1+ vs. 42.6% in patients with residual MR > 1+, p 0.921). Cox regression analysis identified residual MR > 1+ as an independent predictor of re-hospitalization (HR 0.51, 95% CI 0.28-0.92, p =0.026). At 5-year follow-up,  a significant reduction in left ventricular end-systolic volume was  observed in patients with residual MR ≤ 1+. Conclusions – At 5-year follow no significant differences in survival emerged in patients with severe  LV dysfunction undergoing MitraClip therapy regardless residual MR. Nevertheless residual MR > 1+ emerged as an indipendent predictor of re-hospitalization.

Mitral valve repair: Conventional open techniques

2018 ◽  
pp. 135-144
Author(s):  
A. Marc Gillinov ◽  
Tomislav Mihaljevic
Keyword(s):  
Mitral Valve ◽  
Mitral Regurgitation ◽  
Left Ventricular Function ◽  
Ventricular Function ◽  
Mitral Valve Repair ◽  
Left Ventricular ◽  
Valve Repair ◽  
Younger Patients ◽  
Mechanical Prostheses ◽  
Surgical Option

Mitral valve repair is the preferred surgical option for nearly all patients with mitral regurgitation (MR) as its durability is widely recognized to be excellent. Advantages of mitral valve repair over mitral valve replacement include better preservation of left ventricular function, greater freedom from endocarditis and anticoagulant-related hemorrhage, and, in some cases, improved survival. Mitral valve repair has particular advantages in younger patients, who require lifelong anticoagulation if they receive mechanical prostheses. Mitral valve repair can be achieved in more than 90% of patients who have MR caused by prolapse. The forthcoming account includes an overview of the various techniques used in current practice.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document