scholarly journals Transcatheter aortic valve implantation in a 13-year-old child with end-stage heart failure: a case report

2021 ◽  
Vol 5 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Axel Unbehaun ◽  
Marcus Kelm ◽  
Oliver Miera ◽  
Joerg Kempfert
Keyword(s):  
Heart Failure ◽  
Aortic Valve ◽  
Aortic Regurgitation ◽  
Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation ◽  
Left Ventricular ◽  
Transcatheter Aortic Valve ◽  
End Stage Heart Failure ◽  
Aortic Valve Implantation ◽  
End Stage ◽  
Valve Implantation

Abstract Background Left ventricular non-compaction cardiomyopathy (LVNC) has been reported in association with almost all types of congenital heart valve disease. The presence of LVNC-related ventricular dysfunction increases the perioperative risk in these patients. The advantages of transcatheter treatment modalities outweigh those of surgical strategies, as they avoid cardioplegic arrest and myocardial trauma. To our knowledge, there have been no reports on transcatheter treatment of pure aortic regurgitation in patients with a bicuspid aortic valve (BAV) and concomitant LVNC. Case summary In this article, we present the case of a 13-year-old boy with a regurgitant BAV and concomitant LVNC who presented with end-stage heart failure and severe pulmonary hypertension. As a bridge to definitive therapy, the patient underwent an uneventful transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) using a 26-mm balloon-expandable prosthesis. Device success without paravalvular regurgitation was achieved. At 17 months of follow-up, a steady reduction in pulmonary arterial pressure, persistent normalization of systolic left ventricular function and a tremendous improvement in the patient’s physical resilience was observed. The initially considered heart–lung transplantation was avoided and will not be necessary. Discussion To the best of our knowledge, this is the first case performed with TAVI for BAV regurgitation in the context of LVNC. With technical modifications and appropriate planning, TAVI in paediatric patients with a non-calcified BAV is feasible. Different imaging modalities revealed an intriguing relationship between aortic regurgitation and morphological signs of a left ventricular non-compaction myocardium.

Transient severe aortic regurgitation and left ventricular dysfunction due to a stuck leaflet in a patient undergoing percutaneous transcatheter aortic valve implantation

2012 ◽  
Vol 23 (1) ◽  
pp. 108-110
Author(s):  
Tahir Hamid ◽  
Ragheb Hasan ◽  
Vaikom S. Mahadevan
Keyword(s):  
Aortic Valve ◽  
Aortic Regurgitation ◽  
Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation ◽  
Ventricular Dysfunction ◽  
Left Ventricular ◽  
Severe Aortic Regurgitation ◽  
Transcatheter Aortic Valve ◽  
Clinical Consequences ◽  
Aortic Valve Implantation ◽  
Valve Implantation

AbstractWe report the case of a 78-year-old patient who underwent transcatheter aortic valve implantation. During the deployment, the leaflets of the implanted valve appeared to be stuck in calcium protruding from the native aortic leaflets, resulting in transient severe aortic regurgitation leading to cardiac arrest with successful cardiac resuscitation. Transient severe aortic regurgitation secondary to the mechanical failure of the deployed valve can lead to serious clinical consequences.

scholarly journals Impact of myocardial fibrosis on left ventricular remodelling, recovery, and outcome after transcatheter aortic valve implantation in different haemodynamic subtypes of severe aortic stenosis

2020 ◽  
Vol 41 (20) ◽  
pp. 1903-1914 ◽  
Author(s):  
Miriam Puls ◽  
Bo Eric Beuthner ◽  
Rodi Topci ◽  
Anja Vogelgesang ◽  
Annalen Bleckmann ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Heart Failure ◽  
Aortic Valve ◽  
Aortic Stenosis ◽  
Myocardial Fibrosis ◽  
Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation ◽  
Left Ventricular ◽  
Lv Function ◽  
Transcatheter Aortic Valve ◽  
Aortic Valve Implantation ◽  
Valve Implantation

Abstract Aims  Myocardial fibrosis (MF) might represent a key player in pathophysiology of heart failure in aortic stenosis (AS). We aimed to assess its impact on left ventricular (LV) remodelling, recovery, and mortality after transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) in different AS subtypes. Methods and results  One hundred patients with severe AS were prospectively characterized clinically and echocardiographically at baseline (BL), 6 months, 1 year, and 2 years following TAVI. Left ventricular biopsies were harvested after valve deployment. Myocardial fibrosis was assessed after Masson’s trichrome staining, and fibrotic area was calculated as percentage of total tissue area. Patients were stratified according to MF above (MF+) or below (MF−) median percentage MF (≥11% or <11%). Myocardial fibrosis burden differed significantly between AS subtypes, with highest levels in low ejection fraction (EF), low-gradient AS and lowest levels in normal EF, high-gradient AS (29.5 ± 26.4% vs. 13.5 ± 16.1%, P = 0.003). In the entire cohort, MF+ was significantly associated with poorer LV function, higher extent of pathological LV remodelling, and more pronounced clinical heart failure at BL. After TAVI, MF+ was associated with a delay in normalization of LV geometry and function but not per se with absence of reverse remodelling and clinical improvement. However, 22 patients died during follow-up (mean, 11 months), and 14 deaths were classified as cardiovascular (CV) (n = 9 arrhythmia-associated). Importantly, 13 of 14 CV deaths occurred in MF+ patients (CV mortality 26.5% in MF+ vs. 2% in MF− patients, P = 0.0003). Multivariate analysis identified MF+ as independent predictor of CV mortality [hazard ratio (HR) 27.4 (2.0–369), P = 0.01]. Conclusion  Histological MF is associated with AS-related pathological LV remodelling and independently predicts CV mortality after TAVI.

New onset left bundle branch block after transcatheter aortic valve implantation and the effect on long-term survival – a UK wide experience

2020 ◽  
Vol 41 (Supplement_2) ◽  
Author(s):  
S.S Arri ◽  
A Myat ◽  
I Malik ◽  
N Curzen ◽  
A Baumbach ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Aortic Valve ◽  
Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation ◽  
Left Bundle Branch Block ◽  
Left Ventricular ◽  
Bundle Branch Block ◽  
Transcatheter Aortic Valve ◽  
All Cause Mortality ◽  
Aortic Valve Implantation ◽  
Valve Implantation ◽  
New Onset

Abstract Introduction New onset left bundle branch block (LBBB) is the most common conduction disturbance associated with transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI). It has been shown to adversely affect cardiac function and increase re-hospitalisation, although its impact on mortality remains contentious. Methods We conducted an observational cohort analysis of all TAVI procedures performed by 13 heart teams in the United Kingdom from inception of their structural programmes until 31st July 2013. The primary outcome was 1-year all-cause mortality. Secondary outcomes included left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) at 30 days and need for a post-TAVI permanent pacemaker (PPM). Results 1785 patients were eligible for inclusion to the study. The primary analysis cohort was composed of 1409 patients with complete electrocardiographic (ECG) data pre- and post-TAVI. Pre-existing LBBB was present in 200 (14.2%) patients. New LBBB occurred in 323 (22.9%) patients post TAVI, which resolved in 99 (7%) patients prior to discharge. A balloon-expandable device was implanted in 968 (69%) patients, whilst 421 (30%) patients received a self-expandable valve. New LBBB was observed in 120 (12.4%) and 192 (45.6%) patients receiving a balloon- or self-expandable prosthesis respectively. Overall 1-year all-cause mortality post TAVI was 18.7%. New onset LBBB was not associated with an increase in 1-year all-cause mortality (p=0.416). Factors that were associated with mortality included an increasing logistic EuroScore (p=0.05), history of previous balloon aortic valvuloplasty (p=0.001), renal impairment (p=0.003), previous myocardial infarction with pre-existing LBBB (p=0.028) and atrial fibrillation (p=0.039). Lower baseline peak and mean AV gradients were also associated with greater mortality at 1 year (p=0.001), likely reflecting underlying left ventricular dysfunction. In the majority of patients, LVEF remained unchanged following TAVI. Interestingly, the presence or absence of new onset LBBB did not affect LVEF improvement at 30 days. 10% of patients required a PPM post TAVI. Predictors of PPM included new LBBB (OR 2.6, p<0.001), pre-TAVI left ventricular systolic impairment (OR 1.2, p=0.037), a self-expandable device (p<0.001), and pre-existing RBBB (OR 4.0, p<0.001). Conclusions These findings suggest that new onset LBBB post TAVI does not increase mortality at 1 year or adversely affect LVEF at 30 days. Funding Acknowledgement Type of funding source: None

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document