MitraClip: a word of caution regarding an all too liberal indication and delayed referral to surgery in case of failure

Author(s):  
Roya Ostovar ◽  
Michael Erb ◽  
Filip Schroeter ◽  
Michael Zytowski ◽  
Ralf-Uwe Kuehnel ◽  
...  

Abstract OBJECTIVES Although indications for the MitraClip are becoming increasingly liberal, the number of patients requiring valve surgery after an insufficient outcome of the procedure is growing. Referral to surgery is, however, frequently delayed. During this time, the patients often deteriorate. We retrospectively analysed patients before MitraClip implantation and after mitral valve surgery. METHODS A total of 49 patients who received a mitral valve replacement (average 8 ± 12 months after MitraClip implantation) were assessed. Of these, 53% had 2–4 clips inserted. The mean age was 73 years, and the mean log EuroSCORE was 20.79 ± 14.42%. Echocardiographic data obtained prior to MitraClip implantation and preoperatively, 10 days and 6 and 12 months after cardiac surgery were reviewed. Survival analysis, risk profile and postoperative complications were analysed. RESULTS The 30-day and 1-year mortality was 26.5% and 59.2%, respectively. Prior to MitraClip implantation, 42.8% of patients had mild tricuspid insufficiency and 6.1% had moderate tricuspid insufficiency. Prior to surgery, 26.5% showed mild, 32.7% moderate and 38.8% severe tricuspid insufficiency (P < 0.001). Furthermore, right heart function assessed by tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion deteriorated significantly after Implantation of the MitraClip (P < 0.001). In patients with a MitraClip, the pulmonary artery pressure was significantly higher at the time of mitral replacement than it was before the MitraClip was implanted (P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS A subgroup of patients does not benefit from a MitraClip and shows progressive deterioration in cardiac function, making valve replacement under difficult circumstances inevitable. The earlier these patients are operated on, the better it is. It can be assumed that some patients would be better off with primary surgery, especially if mitral reconstruction is then still feasible. Therefore, the indications for MitraClip implantation should be carefully considered and caution should be exercised during monitoring.

Author(s):  
Markus Schlömicher ◽  
Matthias Bechtel ◽  
Zulfugar Taghiyev ◽  
Yazan Al-Jabery ◽  
Peter Lukas Haldenwang ◽  
...  

Objective Patients undergoing multiple valve surgery represent a high-risk group who could potentially benefit from a reduction of cross-clamp and cardiopulmonary bypass times because prolonged bypass and cross-clamp times are considered independent risk factors for increased morbidity and mortality after cardiac surgery. Methods Between July 2013 and November 2014, 16 patients underwent rapid deployment aortic valve replacement with the EDWARDS INTUITY valve system in the setting of concomitant mitral disease. Fifteen patients showed mitral regurgitation, whereas one patient had severe mitral stenosis. Fourteen patients received mitral valve repair and two patients received biological mitral valve replacement. Tricuspid valve repair was performed additionally in two patients. The mean ± SD age was 72.8 ± 8.4 years, and the mean ± SD logistic EuroSCORE II is 8.7% ± 3.4%. Results Within a 30-day perioperative period, no patient was lost (n = 0). The mean ± SD follow-up time was 11 ± 2 months. At 1 year, the overall survival was 81% (n = 13). A mean ± SD transaortic gradient of 10.7 ± 2.3 mm Hg and a mean ± SD effective orifice area of 1.7 ± 0.3 cm2 were measured echocardiographically. No higher-grade paravalvular leak (aortic insufficiency > 1+) occurred. Eight patients (61%) had no residual mitral regurgitation, four patients (30%) showed trivial regurgitation (1/4), and one patient (7.3%) had moderate mitral regurgitation (2/4). No interference of the subannular stent frame with the reconstructed valve or the biological mitral prosthesis was seen. Conclusions Rapid deployment aortic valve replacement with the EDWARDS INTUITY valve system in combined aortic and mitral valve surgery can be performed safely with reproducible results. One-year follow-up data of this small series shows encouraging results potentially justifying the extension of the indication for rapid deployment valves to patients with concomitant mitral disease. Especially elderly patients undergoing multiple valve surgery may benefit from a reduction of cardiopulmonary bypass and myocardial ischemic times.


2017 ◽  
Vol 4 (5) ◽  
pp. 1748
Author(s):  
M. Amellal ◽  
L. Mermad ◽  
S. Moughil ◽  
Y. Bjijou ◽  
El Bouchikhi

Background: Rheumatic mitral valvulopathy is often associated with other valvulopathies. It remains endemic in developing countries where it is the leading cause of heart failure and cardiovascular death.Methods: This study provides a retrospective analysis of 1025 cases involving patients who underwent mitral valve surgery at Ibn Sina Hospital in Rabat, Morocco between the dates of January 2, 2001 and April 5, 2012. Preoperatively a clinical and paraclinical assessment has been established.Results: The predominant valvular defects are mitral stenosis, functional tricuspid insufficiency. The gesture was a first intervention in 93% of the cases, with mitral valve replacement in 90% of cases and plasty in 10% of the cases.Conclusions: These patients deserve more accurate evaluation in the choice of the surgical strategy which strongly impacts the post-operative outcomes. This report discusses the factors supporting mitral repair surgery in rheumatic disease, according to the patients' characteristics and the effectiveness of the current repair techniques compared to prosthetic valve replacement in developing countries.


2021 ◽  
Vol 32 (4) ◽  
pp. 1103-1110
Author(s):  
Florian E. M. Herrmann ◽  
Anne‐Sophie Schleith ◽  
Helen Graf ◽  
Sebastian Sadoni ◽  
Christian Hagl ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Ayman Badawy ◽  
Mohamed Alaa Nady ◽  
Mohamed Ahmed Khalil Salama Ayyad ◽  
Ahmed Elminshawy

Background: Minimally invasive mitral valve surgery became an attractive option because of its cosmetic advantages over the conventional approach. The superiority of the minimally invasive approach regarding other aspects is still debatable. The aim of our study was to determine the potential benefits of minimally invasive mitral valve replacement with intraoperative video assistance over conventional surgery. Methods: This is a single-center prospective cohort study that included 60 patients with rheumatic heart disease who underwent mitral valve replacement. Patients were divided into two groups: group (A) included patients who had conventional sternotomy (n= 30), and group (B) included patients who had video-assisted minimally invasive mitral valve replacement (n= 30). Intraoperative and postoperative outcomes were compared between both groups. Results: Mortality occurred in one patient in the group (A). Cardiopulmonary bypass time was 118.93 ± 29.84 minutes vs. 64.73 ± 19.16 minutes in group B and A respectively (p< 0.001), and ischemic time was 102.27 ± 30.03 minutes vs. 53.67± 18.46 minutes in group B and A respectively (P < 0.001). Ventilation time was 2.77± 2.27 vs. 6.28 ± 4.48 hours in group B and A respectively (p< 0.001) and blood transfusion was 0.50 ± 0.63 vs. 2.83 ± 1.34 units in group B and A respectively (p< 0.001).  ICU stay was 1.73 ± 0.64 days in the group (B) vs. 4.47 ± 0.94 days in group A (p< 0.001). Postoperative bleeding was 353.33 ± 146.77 ml in the group (B) vs. 841.67 ± 302.03 ml in group A (p <0.001). No conversion to full sternotomy was reported in group B. In group (B), two cases (6.6%) required re-exploration for bleeding vs. four cases (13.2%) in group (A) (p=0.67). The hospital stay was 6.13 ± 1.59 days in the group (B) vs. 13.27 ± 7.62 days in group A (p< 0.001). Four cases (13.3%) developed mediastinitis in group A and in the group (B), there was one case of acute right lower limb embolic ischemia. Conclusion: Video-assisted minimally invasive mitral operations could be a safe alternative to conventional sternotomy with the potential of lesser morbidity and earlier hospital discharge.


2019 ◽  
Vol 30 (3) ◽  
pp. 424-430 ◽  
Author(s):  
Masayoshi Tokoro ◽  
Sadanari Sawaki ◽  
Takahiro Ozeki ◽  
Mamoru Orii ◽  
Akihiko Usui ◽  
...  

Abstract OBJECTIVES Totally endoscopic aortic valve replacement (AVR) is still a challenging operation, and only a few series reports exist in the literature. The purposes of this study were to establish a method for endoscopic AVR and evaluate its initial results. METHODS A total of 47 patients (median age 76 years, 17 men) underwent endoscopic AVR. The main wound was created in the right anterolateral 4th intercostal space through a 4-cm skin incision. No rib spreader was used. A 3-dimensional endoscope was inserted at the midaxillary line. A 5.5-mm trocar was inserted in the 3rd intercostal space, thus creating a 3-port setting similar to that used for endoscopic mitral valve surgery. A standard prosthesis was used, and the sutures were tied using a knot pusher. Results were compared with those of 157 patients who underwent right transaxillary AVR with direct vision plus endoscopic assist. RESULTS Patient backgrounds did not differ significantly between the 2 groups. No deaths occurred in the entire series. There was no conversion to thoracotomy or sternotomy in the endoscopic AVR group. The complication rate did not differ significantly between the 2 groups. The total operating time was significantly shorter in endoscopic AVR (188–206 min); the cardiopulmonary bypass time (130–128 min) and the cross-clamp time (90–95 min) did not differ significantly (median, endoscopic AVR, right transaxillary AVR). Two patients underwent endoscopic double-valve (aortic and mitral) surgery under the same conditions. CONCLUSIONS Endoscopic AVR was possible through 3 ports created in the right anterolateral chest, similar to the procedure for endoscopic mitral valve surgery. By adopting a common approach for both the aortic and the mitral valve operations, endoscopic double-valve surgery can be performed seamlessly.


Author(s):  
Hoang Trung Kien ◽  
Vu Van Ba ◽  
Le Tien Dung ◽  
Nguyen Manh Hung ◽  
Do Duc Thinh ◽  
...  

Objective: Cox Maze procedure is an effective surgical treatment of atrial fibrillation and it is often performed concomitantly with mitral valve surgery. However, some patients still experience atrial tachyarrhythmia post-surgery, which adversely affects heart function as well as their quality of life. Method: We present the case of a 66-year-old female patient who underwent mitral valve replacement with a bio-prosthesis and Cox-Maze procedure; she was later admitted to our center after 14 months due to pneumonia and atrial tachycardia. An electrophysiology study/ intervention was performed. Result: We successfully determined the mechanism and ablated the atrial tachyarrhythmia. The sinus rhythm was restored and was maintained 3 months post-procedure, with amelioration of the left ventricular function. Conclusion: Electrophysiology study with electro-anatomy mapping can help to determine the mechanism of arrhythmia to guide successful ablation of post-operative arrhythmia


2018 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
pp. 89
Author(s):  
Redoy Ranjan ◽  
Mushfiqur Rahman ◽  
Heemel Saha ◽  
Dipannita Adhikary ◽  
Sanjoy Kumar Saha ◽  
...  

<p class="Abstract">This study is based on the findings of a single surgeon’s practice of mitral valve replacement of 167 patients from April 2005 to June 2017 who developed symptomatic mitral restenosis after closed or open mitral commisurotomy. Both clinical and color doppler echocardiographic data of peri-operative and six months follow-up period were evaluated and compared to assess the early outcome of the redo mitral valve surgery. With male-female ratio of 1: 2.2 and after a duration of 6 to 22 years symptom free interval between the redo procedures, the selected patients with mitral valve restenosis undergone valve replacement with either mechanical valve in 62% cases and also tissue valve in 38% cases. Particular emphasis was given to separate the adhered pericardium from the heart completely to ameliorate base to apex and global contraction of the heart. Besides favorable post-operative clinical outcome, the echocardiographic findings were also encouraging as there was statistically significant increase in the mitral valve area and ejection fraction with significant decrease in the left atrial diameter, pressure gradient across the mitral valve and pulmonary artery systolic pressure. Therefore, in case of inevitable mitral restenosis after closed or open commisurotomy, mitral valve replacement is a promising treatment modality.</p>


2020 ◽  
Vol 68 (12) ◽  
pp. 1439-1446
Author(s):  
Tomoyuki Fujita ◽  
Hiroyuki Yamamoto ◽  
Junjiro Kobayashi ◽  
Satsuki Fukushima ◽  
Hiroaki Miyata ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Ischemic papillary muscle rupture (PMR) is a catastrophic complication following acute myocardial infarction (AMI). We evaluated early outcomes of PMR by using data from the Japan Cardiovascular Surgery Database, a nationwide Japanese registry. Methods We retrospectively analyzed data from 196 patients diagnosed with PMR following AMI in Japan between January 2014 and December 2017. Risk factors for operative mortality and severe complications following mitral valve surgery were analyzed. Results The 30-day and hospital mortality rates were 20% and 26%, respectively. Chronic hemodialysis, abrupt rupture after AMI, resuscitation before surgery, and preoperative venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation were associated with mortality. Mitral valve replacement was chosen mainly (90%) for surgical correction of mitral regurgitation in these patients. There was no significant difference in short-term outcomes between mitral valve replacement versus mitral valve repair, despite non-matched characteristics in background between the treatment groups. Concomitant coronary artery bypass grafting had no impact on short-term outcomes. Conclusions Information derived from the nationwide database of patients with AMI-associated PMR show that PMR is a rare condition in the modern era. However, PMR is a severe disease with a mortality rate as high as 26%. The severity of the condition is associated with the risk for poor outcomes.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document