scholarly journals Re: Video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery yields better outcomes than thoracotomy for anatomical lung resection in Brazil: a propensity score-matching analysis using the Brazilian Society of Thoracic Surgery database

2018 ◽  
Vol 53 (5) ◽  
pp. 999-1000
Author(s):  
Pierre-Emmanuel Falcoz
Author(s):  
Zhengcheng Liu ◽  
Rusong Yang

Abstract Objective The aim of this study was to compare early outcome between intercostal uniportal video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (IU-VATS) versus subxiphoid uniportal video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (SU-VATS) in thymectomy for non-myasthenic early-stage thymoma. Method Retrospective analysis of 76 cases completed in our hospital from May 2018 to September 2019 with subxiphoid uniportal thoracoscopic thymectomy; a single incision of ∼3 cm was made ∼1 cm under the xiphoid process. The control group included 213 patients who received intercostal uniportal thoracoscopic thymectomy from August 2015, and propensity score matching was conducted. All patients who were clinically diagnosed with thymic tumor before surgery were treated with thymectomy. Perioperative outcomes between SU-VATS (n = 76) and IU-VATS, n = 76 were compared. Result After propensity score matching, there were no statistically significant differences between the two groups in terms of age, gender, disease stage, maximal tumor size, or other baseline demographic and clinical variables. All operation was successfully completed; there were no significant differences in the operative time (88 vs. 81 minutes, p = 0.63), intraoperative blood loss (55 vs. 46 mL, p = 0.47), postoperative drainage time (2.2 vs. 2.5 days, p = 0.72), and postoperative hospital stay (3.2 vs. 3.4 days, p = 0.78) between the two groups. The visual analog scale (VAS) on postoperative days 1, 3, 7, and 30 was less in the SU-VATS group than that in the IU-VATS group. The VAS on days 60 and 180 did not differ significantly between the two groups. Conclusion Thymectomy using SU-VATS is a feasible procedure; it might reduce early postoperative pain and lead to faster recovery.


Author(s):  
Yu-Wei Liu ◽  
Hao-Wei Chen ◽  
Jui-Ying Lee ◽  
Hung-Hsing Chiang ◽  
Hsien-Pin Li ◽  
...  

Background The omission of chest tubes after thoracoscopic procedures such as sympathectomy, lung biopsy, and lung resection has proven efficacious in decreasing pain and length of hospital stay in some cases. However, its safety for mediastinal diseases remains unclear. This study evaluated the feasibility and outcome of eliminating chest drains after video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) for mediastinal tumor resection. Methods We retrospectively investigated 70 patients receiving VATS mediastinal tumor resection in a single institution between January 2016 and November 2018. A total of 39 patients (drain group) received postoperative chest drains and 31 patients (no-drain group) did not. Group clinical outcomes and operation data were compared. A propensity score matching analysis was further performed to yield a fairer comparison. Results Before propensity score matching, the no-drain group had a higher prevalence of cystic lesions, a shorter operative time, and less blood loss compared with the drain group (p = 0.015, p = 0.018, and p < 0.001, respectively). After matching, the group differences in these perioperative variables lost significance (p = 0.095, 0.4, and 0.2, respectively). The no-drain group had lower postoperative day 2 pain scores and shorter postoperative hospital stays than the drain group, regardless of whether they were matched (pain: p = 0.028; hospital stay < 0.001) or not (pain: p = 0.003; hospital stay < 0.001). No major adverse events occurred in either group during hospitalization or follow-up period. Conclusion Eliminating chest drain placement after VATS mediastinal tumor resection may benefit some patients and decrease postoperative pain and hospital stay without increasing complications or compromising patient safety.


Author(s):  
Chunji Chen ◽  
Xiaofeng Zhang ◽  
Chang Gu ◽  
Yiyang Wang ◽  
Kun Liu ◽  
...  

Abstract OBJECTIVES Our goal was to assess the influence of working hours and working at night on intraoperative complications on surgeons conducting video-assisted pulmonary resections. METHODS We identified all patients who underwent video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) in Shanghai Chest Hospital from January 2015 to April 2017. Univariable and multivariable logistic analyses were used to analyse independent risk factors for intraoperative complications. A 1:4 propensity score matching analysis was conducted to verify those results. RESULTS A total of 15 767 patients who underwent VATS pulmonary resection were included in this study. Among them, 15 280 patients (96.1%) were operated on during daytime working hours and 487 (3.1%) at night. A total of 203 (1.3%) intraoperative complications occurred. Vascular injury was the main cause of intraoperative complications, accounting for 92.1% (187/203). Multivariable logistic regression indicated that age [odds ratio (OR) = 1.68, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.43–1.98; P < 0.001], gender (OR = 1.71, 95% CI 1.26–2.32; P = 0.001), surgical experience (OR = 2.07, 95% CI 1.56–2.75; P < 0.001), type of surgery (OR = 0.31, 95% CI 0.20–0.49; P < 0.001) and operative periods (OR = 2.69, 95% CI 1.61–4.86; P < 0.001) were independent predictors for intraoperative complications. The incidence of intraoperative complications during night-time surgery was significantly higher than that during daytime working hours. A 1:4 propensity score matching-based results verification showed that night-time surgery was still an independent risk factor after propensity score matching (OR = 2.76, 95% CI 1.47–5.15; P = 0.002). CONCLUSIONS The incidence of intraoperative complications from VATS pulmonary resection performed during night hours was significantly higher than that performed during working hours. In the present labour environment, thoracic surgeons should avoid night-time surgery whenever possible.


2016 ◽  
Vol 42 (3) ◽  
pp. 185-190 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ricardo Mingarini Terra ◽  
Pedro Henrique Xavier Nabuco de Araujo ◽  
Leticia Leone Lauricella ◽  
José Ribas Milanez de Campos ◽  
Herbert Felix Costa ◽  
...  

ABSTRACT Objective: To describe the implementation of a robotic thoracic surgery program at a public tertiary teaching hospital and to analyze its initial results. Methods: This was a planned interim analysis of a randomized clinical trial aimed at comparing video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery and robotic surgery in terms of the results obtained after pulmonary lobectomy. The robotic surgery program developed at the Instituto do Câncer do Estado de São Paulo, in the city of São Paulo, Brazil, is a multidisciplinary initiative involving various surgical specialties, as well as anesthesiology, nursing, and clinical engineering teams. In this analysis, we evaluated the patients included in the robotic lobectomy arm of the trial during its first three months (from April to June of 2015). Results: Ten patients were included in this analysis. There were eight women and two men. The mean age was 65.1 years. All of the patients presented with peripheral tumors. We performed right upper lobectomy in four patients, right lower lobectomy in four, and left upper lobectomy in two. Surgical time varied considerably (range, 135-435 min). Conversion to open surgery or video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery was not necessary in any of the cases. Intraoperative complications were not found. Only the first patient required postoperative transfer to the ICU. There were no deaths or readmissions within the first 30 days after discharge. The only postoperative complication was chest pain (grade 3), in two patients. Pathological examination revealed complete tumor resection in all cases. Conclusions: When there is integration and proper training of all of the teams involved, the implementation of a robotic thoracic surgery program is feasible and can reduce morbidity and mortality.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document