scholarly journals Global longitudinal strain aids the detection of non-obstructive coronary artery disease in the resting echocardiogram

2011 ◽  
Vol 13 (7) ◽  
pp. 579-587 ◽  
Author(s):  
D. E. Montgomery ◽  
J. J. Puthumana ◽  
J. M. Fox ◽  
K. O. Ogunyankin
2020 ◽  
Vol 30 (2) ◽  
pp. 222-229
Author(s):  
Mihaela Bolog ◽  
Mihaela Dumitrescu ◽  
Florentina Romanoschi ◽  
Elena Pacuraru ◽  
Alina Rapa

Objective – To examine the utility of global longitudinal strain imaging diastolic index (SI-DI) in the assessment of patients with suspected obstructive coronary artery disease (CAD). Methods – We performed rest 2D standard echocardiography and strain imaging in 30 healthy subjects and in 148 patients with normal or mildly reduced ejection fraction and indication for coronarography for suspected obstructive CAD. Standard echocardiographic and strain parameters were analysed. Results – Global SI-DI was signifi cantly lower in the selected vs control group (p <0.001). After coronarography patients were divided in three subgroups: 74 patients with more than 50% obstruction in any major artery, 26 patients with previous revascularisation but no significant obstructive lesions at present and 48 patients without obstructive artery disease. Average global SI-DI was significantly lower in the subgroup with obstructive CAD vs the other two subgroups (p<0.05). Global SI-DI lower than 0.5 had a good sensitivity (84%) and a reasonable positive predictive value (52%) for detection of obstructive CAD. Conclusions – Global SI-DI is significantly lower in patients with obstructive CAD and normal or mildly reduced ejection fraction compared with normal subjects. A cut off value lower than 0.5 selects patients with a higher probability of obstructive CAD.


2020 ◽  
Vol 37 (8) ◽  
pp. 1222-1232
Author(s):  
Ahmed A. Elamragy ◽  
Mohamed A. Abdelwahab ◽  
Dalia R. Elremisy ◽  
Mohamed Hassan ◽  
Waleed A. Ammar ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 41 (Supplement_2) ◽  
Author(s):  
L Moderato ◽  
G Pastorini ◽  
D Lazzeroni ◽  
A Monello ◽  
G Rusticali ◽  
...  

Abstract Background The aim of this study was to investigate the incremental value of global longitudinal strain (GLS), postsystolic strain index (PSI) and prestretch (PSE) by automated function imaging with respect to wall motion (WM) and coronary flow reserve (CFR) for the diagnosis of significant coronary artery disease (CAD) during dipyridamole stress echocardiography. Methods We retrospectibely enrolled 227 patients with known or suspected CAD, approaching our echo lab to perform a DSE; all patient underwent coronary angiography within 1 month for clinical reasons. Obstructive CAD was defined as the evidence of &gt;70% stenosis during coronary angiogram. Obstructive CAD was detected in 143 (63%) patients, while 84 (37%) had no significant CAD. Global longitudinal strain, PSI and PSE were measured at rest and peak of the stress (after 6 minutes of 0,84mg/kg of dipyridamole infusion). Results Patient with CAD showed a significantly lower GLS at rest (−16.9±4.2 vs −18.6±3.4; p&lt;0.01) and peak (14.9±3.8 vs −21.50±3.3; p&lt;0.01) Figure A; the behavior of GLS was opposite, in patient with CAD showed an increase while in patient without CAD a significant decrease after dipyridamole infusion. There was also a significant difference between groups for Delta PSI (PSIpeak − PSIrest) and Delta PSE (PSEpeak − PSErest), respectively 126±145 vs −40±97, (p&lt;0.01) and 108±163 vs −41±106 (p&lt;0.01) Figure C. ROC analyses produced a statistically valid model: Average GLS at peak (p 0.001; AUC=0.906, cut-off value −18%, sensitivity 83% and specificity 82%); on the basis of these results, we compared WM and myocardial deformation analysis and GLS was superior to CFR LAD, Delta EF, Delta ESV and Delta WMI (Figure B). Conclusions GLS, PSE and PSI show an opposite response to dipyridamole, in patients with CAD in patient without CAD and show much higher sensitivity and specificity compared to the conventional parameters like WMI, EF and CFR in detecting CAD Funding Acknowledgement Type of funding source: None


2018 ◽  
Vol 38 (3) ◽  
pp. 413-421 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hou-juan Zuo ◽  
Xiu-ting Yang ◽  
Qi-gong Liu ◽  
Yan Zhang ◽  
He-song Zeng ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document